Tom Mitchell

[caj23]

Didn't you know Mark that you can't be seen to criticize the club on this forum?

If you post anything negative you are belittled as an idiot

[chalbilto]

Hey caj23, I personally enjoy this forum and even I don't totally agree with all the comments posted on here, I accept them, for posters have a right to express their ideas and viewpoints about footy issues.
As we live in a free society may I suggest, that if you feel grieved about not being seen to criticize the club, then feeling belittled as being an idiot for posting "anything negative", then do not participate and maybe you should post on other footy forums. As shock often say if you don't want to listen to them, just change the dial.

[AnnieH]

$1000 per interview.
Tell him he's dreaming.

[Ludwig]

$1000 per interview.
Tell him he's dreaming.

What a joke. Even I don't get that much.

[Blood Fever]

Didn't you know Mark that you can't be seen to criticize the club on this forum?

If you post anything negative you are belittled as an idiot

Difference between some negative posts and incessant criticism

[Markwebbos]

Difference between some negative posts and incessant criticism

??

[caj23]

Hey caj23, I personally enjoy this forum and even I don't totally agree with all the comments posted on here, I accept them, for posters have a right to express their ideas and viewpoints about footy issues.
As we live in a free society may I suggest, that if you feel grieved about not being seen to criticize the club, then feeling belittled as being an idiot for posting "anything negative", then do not participate and maybe you should post on other footy forums. As shock often say if you don't want to listen to them, just change the dial.

So everyone is welcome to express their own opinion on this forum, so long as it falls in line with the groupthink that exists.

If it doesn't, disparaging someone is OK, and if you don't like it leave

Thanks for the kind advice chalbilto

[rojo]

I for one wish Tom well for tonight. He might get pipped by Gawn but to do so well as a key midfielder at Hawthorn, despite the attention given him by opposition coaches and taggers, he would be a worthy winner. I still don't understand the sour grapes here. We had him, we could have kept him if we had wanted to but for us he was superfluous to requirements and Hawthorn wanted him. As Tom Harley said, we should be happy for him. If he had still been with us would he have still been in contention? I wonder who will get the most votes from our team, probably Sinkers, Buddy, Lloyd or Parks?

[barry]

So everyone is welcome to express their own opinion on this forum, so long as it falls in line with the groupthink that exists.

If it doesn't, disparaging someone is OK, and if you don't like it leave

Thanks for the kind advice chalbilto

No it's not.

If chalbilto had his time again, he would change his post.

There is never a need to personally disparage someone over a footy view.

[Blood Fever]

??

My comments weren't in reply to one of your posts

[chalbilto]

Hey caj23 you are more than welcome for the advice, and what you do with it, is entirely up to you. As I previously said, we live in a free society and as such, you can do whatever you like.

[caj23]

Hey caj23 you are more than welcome for the advice, and what you do with it, is entirely up to you. As I previously said, we live in a free society and as such, you can do whatever you like.

Lets just leave it at that

Thanks chalbilto, I'll take it on board

[Markwebbos]

My comments weren't in reply to one of your posts

Thanks Blood Fever, didn't know if that was directed at me.

[Go Swannies]

I for one wish Tom well for tonight. He might get pipped by Gawn but to do so well as a key midfielder at Hawthorn, despite the attention given him by opposition coaches and taggers, he would be a worthy winner. I still don't understand the sour grapes here. We had him, we could have kept him if we had wanted to but for us he was superfluous to requirements and Hawthorn wanted him. As Tom Harley said, we should be happy for him. If he had still been with us would he have still been in contention? I wonder who will get the most votes from our team, probably Sinkers, Buddy, Lloyd or Parks?

I don't think we could have kept Mitchell unless we were prepared to pay well over the odds to match the Hawks. They saw his as their salvation and he followed the money and good luck to him. I hope Clarko thinks a Brownlow justifies the cost, and the indignity of going out in straight sets. Should we have paid Tom more that Josh or Luke, for example? Only time will tell.

[0918330512]

I don't think we could have kept Mitchell unless we were prepared to pay well over the odds to match the Hawks. They saw his as their salvation and he followed the money and good luck to him. I hope Clarko thinks a Brownlow justifies the cost, and the indignity of going out in straight sets. Should we have paid Tom more that Josh or Luke, for example? Only time will tell.

He’d have the same thoughts as Longmire has on Buddy and Tippett thus far I’d say. Only time will tell