-
-
CO'R has been a star in defence.Comment
-
by laws - smy lawsComment
-
What rule book are they using? Seems pretty unequivocal that they lose their score. Puzzling.Comment
-
Nice goal from Rose."You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."Comment
-
A Herald Sun article also said this ...
AFL 2015: Nine AFL rules you never knew existed
A free kick and 50m penalty is awarded to the captain of the opposing team when a head count confirms there are more than the permitted number of players on the ground. Under subsection (c) the team with additional players on the ground will lose ALL points which it has scored in the match up until the count. However, under Rule 5.5.4, a free kick is paid against the team who calls for the count if the opposing team has the right number of players on the ground. A player can also be reported (for time wasting) if the umpire believes count was requested primarily to delay play.Comment
-
Scott where did you get that from? Doesn't look like the 2018 rules and regulations.Comment
-
I don’t usually swear (and Southport were the better side) but WTF? Don’t say that the “bylaws” say it when it’s happened before in the NEAFL last year no less and this was the result!
Bizarre Scenes As NEAFL Players Forced Into Head Count
Bizarre Scenes As NEAFL Players Forced Into Head Count
NEAFL spectators were treated to something truly unique on Saturday.
During the clash between the Swans and the Giants, the umpires stopped play.
They did it to complete a head count, thinking the Giants might have had one too many players on the field.
Players lined up so the umpires could figure it out, and it worked: the Giants were found to have one too many on the field, according to AFL NSW/ACT's Twitter feed.
An extra player on the ground meant the Giants had their score completely reset, from 0.4 (4) to 0.0 (0).Comment
-
This is the 2018 laws of the game.
I look forward to seeing where the by-laws in reference are out of interest - given what happened previously...
- - - Updated - - -
Both did well in a well beaten side. Maibaum in particular impressed me with his reading of the footy in tough conditions and COR never gave up trying. Will be disappointed if with a good pre-season he isn't part of our senior 22 for Rd 1."You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."Comment
-
Comment
-
Matt Stevic the match referee....
Comment
-
According to NEAFL Twitter, it was treated as an interchange breach: NEAFL on Twitter: "The incident at the start of the fourth quarter is deemed an interchange breach as per the NEAFL rules and regs. The current score is correct. @SouthportSharks @sydneyswans"
Seems pretty convenient for mine."You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."Comment
Tweet
Comment