#AFL Round 4 Weekly Discussion Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dejavoodoo44
    Veterans List
    • Apr 2015
    • 8727

    #16
    Arms pinned, head slammed into the turf, sling tackle, doesn't seem to be against the rules today, either.

    Comment

    • aardvark
      Veterans List
      • Mar 2010
      • 5685

      #17
      So many short kicks and handballs. It's a relief when it gets out in the open. It's all a bit dull.

      Comment

      • stevoswan
        Veterans List
        • Sep 2014
        • 8573

        #18
        Originally posted by dejavoodoo44
        Arms pinned, head slammed into the turf, sling tackle, doesn't seem to be against the rules today, either.
        Setterfield on Powell? It looked bad.....

        Comment

        • dejavoodoo44
          Veterans List
          • Apr 2015
          • 8727

          #19
          Originally posted by stevoswan
          Setterfield on Powell? It looked bad.....
          Yeah, probably get a week or two, but no free kick against.
          Oh well, at least Carlton lost to a flukey late goal. Nice effort by Bowes though.

          Comment

          • Blood Fever
            Veterans List
            • Apr 2007
            • 4051

            #20
            Originally posted by dejavoodoo44
            Yeah, probably get a week or two, but no free kick against.
            Oh well, at least Carlton lost to a flukey late goal. Nice effort by Bowes though.
            On a cheerier note, watched Hawks go down to Saints. Again they had no luck with injuries and umpires. Makes a nice change. Wouldn't be surprised if Clarko spits the dummy again.

            Comment

            • dejavoodoo44
              Veterans List
              • Apr 2015
              • 8727

              #21
              Originally posted by Blood Fever
              On a cheerier note, watched Hawks go down to Saints. Again they had no luck with injuries and umpires. Makes a nice change. Wouldn't be surprised if Clarko spits the dummy again.
              Wish I watched it. More coffee for Gil, perhaps?

              Comment

              • Blood Fever
                Veterans List
                • Apr 2007
                • 4051

                #22
                Originally posted by dejavoodoo44
                Wish I watched it. More coffee for Gil, perhaps?
                That was a shocking misjudgement by McLachlan. Talk about conflict of interest but of course that went out with buttoned up boots especially once the present Collingwood president got involved with commentating and hosting football. Disgrace but both Gil and Eddy are protected media species.

                Comment

                • stevoswan
                  Veterans List
                  • Sep 2014
                  • 8573

                  #23
                  Originally posted by stevoswan

                  Cats v Giants should be a good game and I've tipped the Saints to beat the Hawks as a 'roughie'.
                  Thank you....

                  Great win by the Saints....

                  Comment

                  • neilfws
                    Senior Player
                    • Aug 2009
                    • 1834

                    #24
                    I think Thursday put me off for the rest of the week!

                    The little I saw of Pies/Dogs was putrid, but I gather it improved. Watching the Dogs makes me a bit irrational though.

                    Caught the last few minutes of the Giants come-back and win. Good to see one Sydney team that can bring it home under pressure.

                    Also quite enjoying the "resurgence", if that's the word, of the Suns. But again when I see Carlton, it just highlights that the Swans at their best so far this year just barely beat the worst by far.

                    There's always next week.

                    Comment

                    • Hotpotato
                      Senior Player
                      • Jun 2014
                      • 2284

                      #25
                      Originally posted by Blood Fever
                      That was a shocking misjudgement by McLachlan. Talk about conflict of interest but of course that went out with buttoned up boots especially once the present Collingwood president got involved with commentating and hosting football. Disgrace but both Gil and Eddy are protected media species.
                      The only other person I know who uses the expression

                      ‘that went out with buttoned up boots”

                      is my Scottish Father in Law and he’s 91.

                      Comment

                      • Blood Fever
                        Veterans List
                        • Apr 2007
                        • 4051

                        #26
                        Originally posted by Hotpotato
                        The only other person I know who uses the expression

                        ‘that went out with buttoned up boots”

                        is my Scottish Father in Law and he’s 91.
                        I'm getting up there but still a baby boomer! Got it from my late mum and dad. Irish background.

                        Comment

                        • barry
                          Veterans List
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 8499

                          #27
                          Originally posted by Blood Fever
                          That was a shocking misjudgement by McLachlan. Talk about conflict of interest but of course that went out with buttoned up boots especially once the present Collingwood president got involved with commentating and hosting football. Disgrace but both Gil and Eddy are protected media species.
                          I think it was great Gill was meeting with coaches. It's should be all coaches, and equal amount of time.

                          Comment

                          • Blood Fever
                            Veterans List
                            • Apr 2007
                            • 4051

                            #28
                            Originally posted by barry
                            I think it was great Gill was meeting with coaches. It's should be all coaches, and equal amount of time.
                            Only met with his close friend as he described him at the time. If it was a fair dinkum ethical competition, he would have been fired.

                            Comment

                            • stevoswan
                              Veterans List
                              • Sep 2014
                              • 8573

                              #29
                              Because Hawthorn are the only team screwed by the umpires??? Delusional......

                              Just saw this headline on the AFL website:

                              'It's the wrong decision ... let's just call it what it is'
                              Why Clarko needs another coffee with Gill, how the Suns almost blew it, Carlton's mistakes, the underappreciated Eagle, plus more. WATCH AAA


                              Another coffee?!! WTF? It seems it's accepted as normal down here in Victoria.....sure they might be 'having a joke' but it's a @@@@ing sick one that massages acceptance for what was/is a clear 'conflict of interest'.

                              They just don't get it! Never once have they said Horse should 'have a coffee' with Dil.....because they just don't see anything outside of a Victorian point of view.
                              Last edited by stevoswan; 15 April 2019, 12:49 PM.

                              Comment

                              • KTigers
                                Senior Player
                                • Apr 2012
                                • 2499

                                #30
                                Originally posted by stevoswan
                                They're talking to Hanners atm on Seven. Feel for him defending his current situation. Then they asked him who he thinks is the clubhouse leader in the 'Mark of the Year' and he gave Heeney 7 out of 10 and Crozier a '9 or 10'.....he is definitely not a Swan anymore.
                                I think "Mark Of The Year" so far may now be with Harry Himmelberg of GWS down at the Cattery on Saturday. It was Nick Reiwoldt at
                                the SCG 2004 type stuff.... add him to the list of excellent footballers from north of the border also (he's from Canberra).

                                Comment

                                Working...