Lethal: umpires deserve better

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SWANSBEST
    On the Rookie List
    • Jan 2003
    • 868

    Lethal: umpires deserve better

    Lethal: umpires deserve better
    13 April 2004 Herald Sun
    Paul Malone

    THE AFL will today consider whether to carpet Collingwood president Eddie McGuire over his telecast comments that a Queensland rookie official was "the goal umpire from hell".

    Brisbane Lions coach Leigh Matthews said he expects McGuire will be given a "please explain" letter by the AFL over his criticism of first-game goal umpire Brent Fewkes.

    Fewkes made two contentious calls in last Thursday's Collingwood-Brisbane game.

    Matthews warned that disrespect shown to umpires is "one of the great problems" in the AFL.

    AFL Umpires Association president David Howlett said McGuire's criticism as a match commentator for Channel 9 was little different to when Essendon captain James Hird said that umpire Scott McLaren "was not doing the right thing by us".

    Hird yesterday said he apologised if he had offended McLaren, but could be fined up to $5000 by the AFL as early as today.

    The AFL Commission will decide whether to suspend or deregister Hird for his criticism of the umpire. Hird said his comments were inappropriate.

    AFL spokesman Patrick Keane said AFL rules did permit for action to be taken against club presidents.

    Matthews said despite McGuire's media employment it was beholden of club officials to not be "publicly denigrating of umpires".

    "You are clearly first and foremost a club official. Second to that, you are working in the media, but there are many footballers working in the media," said Matthews, who has extensive experience as a media pundit.

    "If any official or player is denigrating or demeaning to an umpire publicly, then the 'please explain' letter goes out and action is taken unless there is some contributing circumstance.

    "We get frustrated and disappointed (with umpiring decisions), but we have to bite our tongues.

    "The discouragement it (criticism) gives to people who may take up umpiring more than justifies a really hardline attitude.

    "One of the great problems in our game and any sport is respect for officials.

    "I'm incredibly disappointed when I go to a game of footy and if they introduce the umpires before the game everyone boos."

    Asked if the wider issue of McGuire's role as a commentator conflicting with reponsibilities as a club president was a concern for the AFL, Keane said: "That would be an issue for Channel 9, as to how he is perceived as a broadcaster."

    McGuire's commentary on games involving Collingwood continues to rankle with many fans of other clubs.



    WMP
  • SWANSBEST
    On the Rookie List
    • Jan 2003
    • 868

    #2
    McGuire ump call angers Lethal
    By Peter Blucher
    Brisbane
    April 13, 2004





    Brisbane Lions coach Leigh Matthews yesterday voiced his support for the AFL's strong stance against umpire-bashing and criticised Collingwood president Eddie McGuire for his unflattering description of a goal umpire in his commentary on Thursday night.

    Matthews said the AFL should ask McGuire to explain his description of first-game goal umpire Brent Fewkes as "the goal umpire from hell" after he wrongly awarded a goal to Brisbane's Tim Notting in the Lions-Collingwood clash.

    Fewkes's decision was later overturned after consultation with the field umpires.

    "You are clearly first and foremost a club official," said Matthews.

    "It is beholden on officials of football clubs - that is players or officials - not to be denigrating publicly to umpires.




    "Any time you are denigrating towards an umpire, and you are an official, one would think the AFL automatically (sends out) the please-explain letter unless there is some contributing circumstance," he said.

    Matthews suggested a fine of $5000 would be "insignificant" for Essendon captain James Hird over his outburst on The Footy Show against umpire Scott McLaren last week.

    He questioned whether the AFL Commission, before which Hird will also appear, had the power to impose a penalty stiffer than the maximum fine available to the tribunal.

    "I suspect the catch-all rule that says 'we don't like what you've done' . . . talking about bringing the game into disrepute and all that . . . that enables the AFL Commission to do what they like," he said.

    Matthews, in his sixth year in Brisbane, has seen first-hand the game's huge fight to attract umpires in Queensland and is passionate about the cause.

    "I think one of the great problems in our game and any sport for that matter is respect for officials," he said.

    "I am incredibly disappointed when I go to a game of footy and if they introduce the umpires, everyone boos - before the game even starts they boo.

    "The other factor is that if you don't have umpires you don't have games so I'm an incredibly strong supporter of anything we can do to add to the respect the official gets.

    "We get frustrated and we get disappointed but we've got to bite our tongue. All of us are probably for freedom of speech but on this particular issue the big picture, the discouragement it gives to people who may take up the umpiring profession, more than justifies a really hard-line attitude.

    "Those of us who are public officials of the game have to be doing what we can to respect and support umpires and never doing anything that demeans them or disrespects them," he said.

    WMP

    Comment

    • CureTheSane
      Carpe Noctem
      • Jan 2003
      • 5032

      #3
      I think it carries more weight (no pun intended ) if an AFL president slams the umps rather than a player.

      Hird at least realised he was wrong and has appologised etc.
      Eddie probably did what he did solely for publicity, and that's one of the the reasons we all hate him.
      The difference between insanity and genius is measured only in success.

      Comment

      Working...