Rd 4 vs North Melbourne @ SCG - Pre-Game Thread

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Roadrunner
    Senior Player
    • Jan 2018
    • 1445

    #61
    Originally posted by Maltopia
    I don’t think the Swans will swing Paddy forward at all this season. They don’t want the nightmare scenario of him going back with the flight for a mark and being cleaned up from behind and getting a concussion.

    They made it clear that they wanted him seeing the play before him to provide him with more safety re head knocks.
    Agreed Maltopia. His health has to be no1 priority and up forward is too risky. Furthermore, he is doing a great job down back and we need him against the monsters. He has helped enormously to solidify us in the backline so there’s no way he would be moved from there!

    The partnership with brother Tom is coming along and will be great once they find their rhythm- signs are good.
    Would like to see some new faces against Norf, not because anyone needs a rest, but if not now then when?

    Comment

    • AB Swannie
      Senior Player
      • Mar 2017
      • 1579

      #62
      I understand the temptation of giving people a rest but it feels too early for me. I can see Buddy being rested next game against West Coast and avoiding the hard ground that did him so much damage a few years ago. Perhaps Kennedy can be used as a sub this game but overall, the minute you take a side easy, the minute you have egg on your face and you en up being 2-2 instead of 3-1. If we bring the required levels of intensity for the next 3 rounds we can realistically be 5-1 and set ourselves up for the season. Take a few games too easy and it creates big headaches.

      Comment

      • Thunder Shaker
        Aut vincere aut mori
        • Apr 2004
        • 4150

        #63
        This game could be a danger game. North Melbourne will be seeking to improve after their 108-point loss last week. They have played okay against us in recent years and our recent record against them has not been convincing despite winning regularly.

        R22 2021 - 14 point win (Docklands)
        R3 2020 - 11 point win (Docklands)
        R9 2019 - 5 point win (Bellerive Oval)
        R17 2018 - 6 point win (Docklands)
        R7 2018 - 2 point loss (SCG)

        Although we've won most of our games against them recently, the margins in many of the games have not been large. It is entirely possible that we could find ourselves underestimating the opposition and drifting towards an unexpected loss.

        We need to be on our game and treat them with respect. They may be last year's wooden spooners, but they won four and a half games last year. They could easily win six or seven this year, and those wins could include upset wins over finalists. We need to make sure one of those upset wins is not us.
        "Unbelievable!" -- Nick Davis leaves his mark on the 2005 semi final

        Comment

        • Thunder Shaker
          Aut vincere aut mori
          • Apr 2004
          • 4150

          #64
          Originally posted by AB Swannie
          I understand the temptation of giving people a rest but it feels too early for me. I can see Buddy being rested next game against West Coast and avoiding the hard ground that did him so much damage a few years ago. Perhaps Kennedy can be used as a sub this game but overall, the minute you take a side easy, the minute you have egg on your face and you en up being 2-2 instead of 3-1. If we bring the required levels of intensity for the next 3 rounds we can realistically be 5-1 and set ourselves up for the season. Take a few games too easy and it creates big headaches.
          I agree, we shouldn't be resting anyone who doesn't need a rest right now. The medi sub is a good way of resting players and that should be considered. It's a home game, so there's less need for a rest. North Melbourne are better than some people expect, and on a good day they could win in an upset.

          I expected West Coast to finish last this year and so far their form has followed this trend. I would be resting Franklin and Kennedy for the West Coast game. Eight hours on a plane and a hard playing surface is going to be hard on aging calf muscles.
          "Unbelievable!" -- Nick Davis leaves his mark on the 2005 semi final

          Comment

          • TheBloods
            Suspended by the MRP
            • Feb 2020
            • 2047

            #65
            Originally posted by Thunder Shaker
            This game could be a danger game. North Melbourne will be seeking to improve after their 108-point loss last week. They have played okay against us in recent years and our recent record against them has not been convincing despite winning regularly.

            R22 2021 - 14 point win (Docklands)
            R3 2020 - 11 point win (Docklands)
            R9 2019 - 5 point win (Bellerive Oval)
            R17 2018 - 6 point win (Docklands)
            R7 2018 - 2 point loss (SCG)

            Although we've won most of our games against them recently, the margins in many of the games have not been large. It is entirely possible that we could find ourselves underestimating the opposition and drifting towards an unexpected loss.

            We need to be on our game and treat them with respect. They may be last year's wooden spooners, but they won four and a half games last year. They could easily win six or seven this year, and those wins could include upset wins over finalists. We need to make sure one of those upset wins is not us.
            We wont take them lightly , we were rubbish last week and we wont cop that

            Comment

            • 111431
              Regular in the Side
              • Sep 2010
              • 697

              #66
              Originally posted by Maltopia
              I don’t think the Swans will swing Paddy forward at all this season. They don’t want the nightmare scenario of him going back with the flight for a mark and being cleaned up from behind and getting a concussion.

              They made it clear that they wanted him seeing the play before him to provide him with more safety re head knocks.
              He did run back into a pack last week and went to his knees. His brother was quickly on hand to assess. I guess each bump he negotiates will give him more confidence in what his body can do

              Comment

              • Aprilbr
                Senior Player
                • Oct 2016
                • 1803

                #67
                I think Paddy is now firmly entrenched as one of our key backs. Players like the Pelican in the Reserves won't get a look in unless Paddy cops an injury.

                Comment

                • longmile
                  Crumber
                  • Apr 2011
                  • 3360

                  #68
                  I agree with the calls of dropping McLean and playing a 2 key fwd forward line of Amartey and Franklin this week due to the weather. McLean is a great pack mark and shot on goal, but isn't great when the ball is on the ground and has the mobility and turning circle of an 8-wheeler. Amartey and Franklin, whilst tall, are mobile and good when the ball is in dispute.

                  Happily revise my changes to:

                  IN: Ladhams, McInerney
                  OUT: Hickey, McLean

                  Ideally I'd put Kennedy in the middle this week and have McInerney in defence.

                  Wicks on notice, with Papley to come back, and Ronke, Taylor and Sheldrick waiting in the wings

                  Comment

                  • Aprilbr
                    Senior Player
                    • Oct 2016
                    • 1803

                    #69
                    Originally posted by longmile
                    I agree with the calls of dropping McLean and playing a 2 key fwd forward line of Amartey and Franklin this week due to the weather. McLean is a great pack mark and shot on goal, but isn't great when the ball is on the ground and has the mobility and turning circle of an 8-wheeler. Amartey and Franklin, whilst tall, are mobile and good when the ball is in dispute.

                    Happily revise my changes to:

                    IN: Ladhams, McInerney
                    OUT: Hickey, McLean

                    Ideally I'd put Kennedy in the middle this week and have McInerney in defence.

                    Wicks on notice, with Papley to come back, and Ronke, Taylor and Sheldrick waiting in the wings
                    I tend to agree with your selections and views, LM.

                    Comment

                    • Auntie.Gerald
                      Veterans List
                      • Oct 2009
                      • 6474

                      #70
                      If we didnt sign Ladhams and Hickey got a 6 week plus injury as he has...........would we have been in deep doo doo for 2022 ?

                      Or is it to early to say re Ladhams making a difference in the absence of Hickey?
                      "be tough, only when it gets tough"

                      Comment

                      • stevoswan
                        Veterans List
                        • Sep 2014
                        • 8543

                        #71
                        Originally posted by Roadrunner
                        Agreed Maltopia. His health has to be no1 priority and up forward is too risky. Furthermore, he is doing a great job down back and we need him against the monsters. He has helped enormously to solidify us in the backline so there’s no way he would be moved from there!

                        The partnership with brother Tom is coming along and will be great once they find their rhythm- signs are good.
                        Would like to see some new faces against Norf, not because anyone needs a rest, but if not now then when?
                        Some may be rested this week but there is also the week after against the Eagles, away. Doubt we'll see Buddy in that one.

                        Comment

                        • neilfws
                          Senior Player
                          • Aug 2009
                          • 1818

                          #72
                          Originally posted by Auntie.Gerald
                          If we didnt sign Ladhams and Hickey got a 6 week plus injury as he has...........would we have been in deep doo doo for 2022 ?

                          Or is it to early to say re Ladhams making a difference in the absence of Hickey?
                          Let's see if he goes as well or better as Sinclair usually does in this situation.

                          Comment

                          • Ralph Dawg
                            Senior Player
                            • Apr 2018
                            • 1729

                            #73
                            Originally posted by Auntie.Gerald
                            If we didnt sign Ladhams and Hickey got a 6 week plus injury as he has...........would we have been in deep doo doo for 2022 ?

                            Or is it to early to say re Ladhams making a difference in the absence of Hickey?
                            I'm not expecting Ladhams to dominate the hitouts and present it to our mids on a platter (I don't think there's a single ruck in the comp who does this week in week out). But as long as he competes in the ruck contest then follows up around the park better than what Sinclair is capable of, then I'll be happy.

                            Comment

                            • barry
                              Veterans List
                              • Jan 2003
                              • 8499

                              #74
                              If we dont beat Norf by a hundred points this round, I dont think we are a genuine premiership threat.

                              Comment

                              • i'm-uninformed2
                                Reefer Madness
                                • Oct 2003
                                • 4653

                                #75
                                Originally posted by barry
                                If we dont beat Norf by a hundred points this round, I dont think we are a genuine premiership threat.
                                Gee Barry, no pressure.
                                'Delicious' is a fun word to say

                                Comment

                                Working...