Swans fined for Covid breaches.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • stevoswan
    Veterans List
    • Sep 2014
    • 8548

    Swans chat Swans fined for Covid breaches.

    Just saw on the ABC News channel that the Swans have been fined (more than any other club) for Covid protocol breaches, ie: players submitting screenshots of other players negative RATS tests and not their own. Is it to be assumed those players may have been positve?

    Quite disappointing that the club has been fined $100, 000.....more than any other club. Collingwood have been fined $50,000, Richmond and Brisbane $25,000 with St Kilda hit with a 'suspended' $25,000 fine.

    Our club is not perfect.....but I still say close to it. Having said that, lift your game Swans. We don't need these off field distractions so close to the finals.
    Last edited by stevoswan; 16 August 2022, 07:27 PM.
  • Mel_C
    Veterans List
    • Jan 2003
    • 4470

    #2
    I just read the article. That is very poor behaviour by the players and/or staff. To be fined $100,000 it must have been multiple breaches.

    Comment

    • cruiser
      What the frack!
      • Jul 2004
      • 6114

      #3
      Originally posted by Maltopia
      We got the biggest fine for COVID-19 protocol breaches. Twice that of the next club, and four times the amount of the next.

      Swans, Pies among five clubs sanctioned for COVID breaches
      The article lacks any detail as to why. Any know why we copped a bigger fine?
      Occupational hazards:
      I don't eat animals since discovering this ability. I used to. But one day the lamb I was eating came through to me and ever since then I haven't been able to eat meat.
      - animal psychic Amanda de Warren

      Comment

      • erica
        Happy and I know it
        • Jan 2008
        • 1247

        #4
        The club has issued a statement. Sydney Swans statement


        Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
        All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. - Edmund Burke

        Comment

        • Ludwig
          Veterans List
          • Apr 2007
          • 9359

          #5
          Originally posted by stevoswan
          Just saw on the ABC News channel that the Swans have been fined (more than any other club) for Covid protocol breaches, ie: players submitting screenshots of other players negative RATS tests and not their own. Is it to be assumed those players may have been positve?
          Didn't someone foreshadow that we had RATbags at the club? Is this what he meant?

          I feel bad for the boys. They are probably finding it hard to afford their own RAT without some COLA help.

          Good on the players for putting a positive spin on some negativity. Or is that a negative spin on some positivity. Whatever. At least they're sharing. It's a tightly knit group.

          Comment

          • stevoswan
            Veterans List
            • Sep 2014
            • 8548

            #6
            Originally posted by cruiser
            The article lacks any detail as to why. Any know why we copped a bigger fine?
            More infringements I guess.

            Comment

            • stevoswan
              Veterans List
              • Sep 2014
              • 8548

              #7
              Originally posted by erica
              The club has issued a statement. Sydney Swans statement
              A good statement....short and sweet with adequate contrition.

              Comment

              • Matty10
                Senior Player
                • Jun 2007
                • 1331

                #8
                Originally posted by Ludwig
                Didn't someone foreshadow that we had RATbags at the club? Is this what he meant?

                I feel bad for the boys. They are probably finding it hard to afford their own RAT without some COLA help.

                Good on the players for putting a positive spin on some negativity. Or is that a negative spin on some positivity. Whatever. At least they're sharing. It's a tightly knit group.
                Well played,sir.

                Comment

                • RogueSwan
                  McVeigh for Brownlow
                  • Apr 2003
                  • 4602

                  #9
                  Originally posted by cruiser
                  The article lacks any detail as to why. Any know why we copped a bigger fine?
                  COLA
                  "Fortunately, this is the internet, so knowing nothing is no obstacle to having an opinion!." Beerman 18-07-2017

                  Comment

                  • crackedactor 01
                    Regular in the Side
                    • Jun 2020
                    • 742

                    #10
                    Originally posted by stevoswan
                    More infringements I guess.
                    For not having enough RAT tests, which have proven to be a unreliable test. I be happy when GIL M and his cronies are gone next year.

                    Comment

                    • 707
                      Veterans List
                      • Aug 2009
                      • 6204

                      #11
                      Originally posted by crackedactor 01
                      For not having enough RAT tests, which have proven to be a unreliable test. I be happy when GIL M and his cronies are gone next year.
                      If you haven't read it, I can highly recommend Michael Warner's book The Boys Club as one you really should.

                      Comment

                      • Maltopia
                        Senior Player
                        • Apr 2016
                        • 1556

                        #12
                        Originally posted by crackedactor 01
                        For not having enough RAT tests, which have proven to be a unreliable test. I be happy when GIL M and his cronies are gone next year.
                        Unreliable or not, it is the expectation across the league, and you pay that overhead, or you end up with distractions like this story and a hit to the soft cap. The article doesn't go into what each club did, but it mentioned the sorts of behaviours (submitting previously submitted photos of completed RAT tests, not conducting RAT tests within the required timeframe etc), and explained the size of the fines was determined by the number/extent of the breaches of policy.

                        Comment

                        • stevoswan
                          Veterans List
                          • Sep 2014
                          • 8548

                          #13
                          Originally posted by crackedactor 01
                          For not having enough RAT tests, which have proven to be a unreliable test. I be happy when GIL M and his cronies are gone next year.
                          So you expect the next lot of cronies to go against Government directives do you?

                          Just curious.....what news service do you watch?

                          Comment

                          • 0918330512
                            Senior Player
                            • Sep 2011
                            • 1654

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Maltopia
                            but it mentioned the sorts of behaviours (submitting previously submitted photos of completed RAT tests, not conducting RAT tests within the required timeframe etc),
                            Not sure how they monitor the time frames.

                            As for submitting previously submitted photos (seriously, submitting the same photo?!) - and I do not condone this! NOT ONE BIT - but if you were unscrupulous enough to try to cheat the system, a thinking man would take multiple shots of the same test in different locations of the house, on different surfaces, perhaps using different phones, perhaps changing the date on your phone (if the image is time stamped). It’s good to see our boys will not be career criminals

                            Comment

                            Working...