If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Well considering what Pickett got then anyone else who does the same only gets half, and Lloyd didn't even get reported I think the tribunal owes us big time.
Anyway get your facts right, he was found guilty and given a reprimand.
And how could you give Lade weeks when Hunter (West Coast)did the same last week and also got a reprimand. Don't you want the tribunal to be consistant?
Originally posted by paralowiepower Well considering what Pickett got then anyone else who does the same only gets half, and Lloyd didn't even get reported I think the tribunal owes us big time.
Anyway get your facts right, he was found guilty and given a reprimand.
And how could you give Lade weeks when Hunter (West Coast)did the same last week and also got a reprimand. Don't you want the tribunal to be consistant?
Both should have been suspended.Hitting blokes in the jatz crackers is a no no.
Originally posted by ScottH Yet poking your finger up someones poophole can get you banned for how long??
12 weeks.
There are a few differences in what AFL and league think is a serious offence.
Scotland and Fevola would have got at least 6 weeks or even more for eye gouging but got a few weeks for unnecessary contact or some other rubbish.
I still can't work out how Jolly got 2 weeks.
Originally posted by Barry Schneider 12 weeks.
There are a few differences in what AFL and league think is a serious offence.
Scotland and Fevola would have got at least 6 weeks or even more for eye gouging but got a few weeks for unnecessary contact or some other rubbish.
In League you can also bop someone, and get 10 mins cooling off. Gehrig gives a little tap in the guts and gets a week.
Originally posted by Barry Schneider I still can't work out how Jolly got 2 weeks.
Nope, nothing in it but carelessness/silliness on his part. No serious contact. I would love to know what the Swans presented as evidence in their appeals.
Comment