We rotated through quite a through this year; McVeigh, Malkeski, Moore, Schneider and Vogels all got quite a big taste. I think we should look at the Weagles though - They have barely anyone on their list without a game next to their name.
Youngster you are looking forward to most in the seniors next year?
Collapse
X
-
-
Ten midfielders in the best 22.
Currently, they are Mathews, Williams, Fosdike, Schneider, Ablett, Bolton, Crouch, Kirk, Buchanan and Goodes. Kennelly and Davis rotate through, but have a spot elsewhere.
McVeigh, Willoughby, Dempster, Moore, Schmidt, Malceski and Bevan could all enter the group. That's a fantastic situation to be in - if only half of our prospects turn out to be long term players, we're cruising. It's the most welcome of selection headaches.
Oh yeah, and in answer to the OP, Malceski by a mile. He's a 200 game player.We hate Anthony Rocca
We hate Shannon Grant too
We hate scumbag Gaspar
But Leo WE LOVE YOU!Comment
-
Originally posted by Bleed Red Blood
Leaves MDavis, Erikson and the Rookies as undebuted.
- Impossible is just a big word thrown around by small men who find it easier to live in a world they've been given, than to explore the power they have to change it. Impossible is not a fact, it's an opinion. Impossible is not a declaration, it's a dare. Impossible is potential. Impossible is temporary. Impossible is nothing!Comment
-
Originally posted by motorace_182
Nick Potter?? Hows his development?Comment
-
Originally posted by Rushed Behind
poor mans jude bolten.malchesky will make it znd grubba will.moore wont. schit might but needs to get his mind of the sheelas.Visit my eBay store -
10% off for mentioning RWO when you buy. Great Christmas presents!Comment
-
Originally posted by Rushed Behind
poor mans jude bolten.malchesky will make it znd grubba will.moore wont. schit might but needs to get his mind of the sheelas.Comment
-
Nick Malceski (althogh I'll be very interested to see how McVeigh presents himself in 2006). Of those who have'nt played firsts Earl Shaw (but I'm not sure he'll get a shot in 2006). Also Stefan Garuba (hope his arm comes good).Comment
-
Willoughby is an interesting one. He really is a mini version of Willo by the way he directs around traffic and he too has pretty neat disposal on him.
Schmidt is a hard nut who's style of play was likened to Mark Ricciuto before he got drafted (acording to Colin Wisbey).
These are the two who i can definately see debuting next year and i hope they do for their sake because they have been very patient waiting for their chance to perform.Last edited by Jeffers1984; 17 October 2005, 04:49 PM.Official Driver Of The "Who Gives A @@@@ As The Player Will Get Delisted Anyway" Bandwagon.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bleed Red Blood
Schmidt, Willoughby, Chambers and Richards should all debut this year.
.Official Driver Of The "Who Gives A @@@@ As The Player Will Get Delisted Anyway" Bandwagon.
Comment
-
I watched that game too. Agree he is on the light side, though.
The vibe is telling me he will fit right in here. I have reason to trust it, considering it was right about the PREEEEEEEMiership, after all.And you can't find nothing at all,
If there was nothing there all along.Comment
-
Originally posted by Jeffers1984
I just saw Richards play on FF last night against Hawthorn early this year. I have serious doubts that he is 93kg which a profile had him as. He is more like a tallish flanker at around 83-85kg. I hope he can do some serious bulking up over the Summer so we could perhaps put him at FB to release Leo.Got plenty to spare
Does God believe in Atheists?Comment
-
Originally posted by Jeffers1984
Willoughby is an interesting one. He really is a mini version of Willo by the way he directs around traffic and he too has pretty neat disposal on him.
Schmidt is a hard nut who's style of play was likened to Mark Ricciuto before he got drafted (acording to Colin Wisbey).
Comment
-
Comment