Ted Richard looks to bump Bazza out

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Charlie
    On the Rookie List
    • Jan 2003
    • 4101

    #31
    Originally posted by Nico


    Anyone thought that he might be a ready replacement for MOL who is a day to day proposition. Not to say he is in MOL's class, but...
    There's no spot for him up forward at the moment. The Swans haven't had as much class in the forward fifty since 1933. I will concede, however, to three Hall of Famers in Pratt, Nash and Matthews.

    I suspect Richards will be groomed as a full-back. It would be a wonderful luxury to allow Leo to move to the third tall, and an even greater luxury for Craig Bolton.
    We hate Anthony Rocca
    We hate Shannon Grant too
    We hate scumbag Gaspar
    But Leo WE LOVE YOU!

    Comment

    • goswannie14
      Leadership Group
      • Sep 2005
      • 11166

      #32
      If this guy is soooooo adaptable I can't wait to see him play
      Does God believe in Atheists?

      Comment

      • OldE

        #33
        It's stupid, vague, and incredibly illogical, but I just have a good vibe about Richards. Regardless of whether he's a gun player, or a backup, he seems like a decent bloke, and a reasonably capable footballer. I'll be proud to have him in the red and white.

        Comment

        • Big Al
          Veterans List
          • Feb 2005
          • 7007

          #34
          Originally posted by eirinn
          It's stupid, vague, and incredibly illogical, but I just have a good vibe about Richards. Regardless of whether he's a gun player, or a backup, he seems like a decent bloke, and a reasonably capable footballer. I'll be proud to have him in the red and white.
          Not so Stupid IMO. The fact that 3 clubs were chasing him seems to be a good sign to me.
          ..And the Swans are the Premiers...The Ultimate Team...The Ultimate Warriors. They have overcome the highly fancied Hawks in brilliant style. Sydney the 2012 Premiers - Gerard Whately ABC

          Here it is Again! - Huddo SEN

          Comment

          • Captain
            Captain of the Side
            • Feb 2004
            • 3602

            #35
            It's rubbish that there is no room for Richards in our forward line.

            He isn't competing with the smaller players such as Davis, O'Keefe, Buchanan etc. Vogels would be the player he would most likely be competing with.

            What's wrong with this forward set up:

            O' Laughlin Richards Schneider
            Davis Hall O'Keefe

            Goodes and Buchanan will play more in the midfield. Vogels on the bench.

            Comment

            • giant
              Veterans List
              • Mar 2005
              • 4731

              #36
              Originally posted by Charlie
              On a lighter note, how funny is the pic of him dumping all his Essendon gear at the op shop?
              Absolute classic. Imagine Sheeds face when he sees some homeless bloke cuddled up in his Bombers track suit under a cardboard box in the local park. Mind you, he might just assume it's Ty Zantuck.

              Comment

              • i'm-uninformed2
                Reefer Madness
                • Oct 2003
                • 4653

                #37
                Errr, we are missing the point, with all the discussion predicated on our best 22 being available.

                Next season, we have a freakish 29yo fullforward with wonky knees, a 29yo CHF who's had an amazing run of injuries and form, a 29yo fullback who's played (brilliantly) out of his division for three years now.

                And their potential replacements? Luke Vogels, still raw, and LRT, still raw - despite his GF performance.

                Having a versatile tall to go forward or back is EXACTLY what we need.
                'Delicious' is a fun word to say

                Comment

                • Charlie
                  On the Rookie List
                  • Jan 2003
                  • 4101

                  #38
                  Originally posted by i'm-uninformed2
                  Errr, we are missing the point, with all the discussion predicated on our best 22 being available.

                  Next season, we have a freakish 29yo fullforward with wonky knees, a 29yo CHF who's had an amazing run of injuries and form, a 29yo fullback who's played (brilliantly) out of his division for three years now.

                  And their potential replacements? Luke Vogels, still raw, and LRT, still raw - despite his GF performance.

                  Having a versatile tall to go forward or back is EXACTLY what we need.
                  Very well put.
                  We hate Anthony Rocca
                  We hate Shannon Grant too
                  We hate scumbag Gaspar
                  But Leo WE LOVE YOU!

                  Comment

                  • SimonH
                    Salt future's rising
                    • Aug 2004
                    • 1647

                    #39
                    Given the huge amount that Vogels has shown in limited opportunities so far, plus the fact that he was extremely unlucky to be squeezed out come finals time, plus the fact that Vogels does not appear to be a natural defender... I say that Vogels is still our first-choice replacement key forward, and play Ted down back.

                    As I've posted elsewhere, when MO'L, BBBH and Vogels were all playing up forward in 2005, and Goodesie pushing forward as he is wont to do, we were at risk (improbably for the Swans) of being too big in our forward line!

                    Comment

                    • WolfGang
                      Pushing for Selection
                      • Nov 2005
                      • 68

                      #40
                      Ted has moved to Sydney yesterday, and is looking forward to the change of life up in Sydney.
                      Ted has already started some training here in Melbourne to get ready for the move to Sydney.
                      I understand that Sydney trains in the Coogee area ( excuse the Melbournian's lack of Sydney layout knowledge). I have been told that it is near the airport??

                      I hope that Ted plays well for Sydney in 2006, but not toooooo well when he plays Essendon in the first round @ Telstra Dome!!
                      Sorry about that but I am an Essendon member.

                      Go the Teddy Bear !!

                      Comment

                      • graystar
                        On the Rookie List
                        • Oct 2005
                        • 543

                        #41
                        Originally posted by Charlie
                        On a lighter note, how funny is the pic of him dumping all his Essendon gear at the op shop?
                        Thats is good, even better he is doing it in St Kilda, not even a Essendon op shop. He has managed to tick off supporters from 2 clubs at once!
                        I will be a member again when I return.

                        Comment

                        • punter257
                          Deadliest Left Boot
                          • Aug 2004
                          • 1660

                          #42
                          i'm looking forward to seeing him in the red and white next season

                          its amazing what coming up to sydney can do to some players and i'm not talking about spriggs either

                          i mean blokes like c bolts and jolly - he'll be a 150 gamer for the swans IMO
                          Roosy = LEGEND

                          Comment

                          • lachlanc
                            On the Rookie List
                            • Jul 2005
                            • 92

                            #43
                            I also rate Richards and was very pleased we managed to get him. It always amazed me the lack of opportunities he got at Essendon as I've seen him do some remarkable things, particularly up forward. I reckon he could be very good value on a forward flank/wing. He's very skilful and creative. Would be surprised if Roos plays him down back. If he does play there, would have to be a flank in my view.
                            lachlanc

                            Comment

                            • Mark Busuttil
                              I held the cup with Roosy
                              • Oct 2005
                              • 132

                              #44
                              I know allot of Essendon fans that are sorry to see Ted go - he was never given a real opportunity there. (couldn't get 2 games in a row & surely not the reason for the Don's decline)
                              As for those who ask who he could replace, we have a few players (like Willow) who aren't far from retiring & allot of players who are lucky to be in the side (like Bevan) He's only had 1 great year (I felt for Vogels on GF day but maybe this will make him hungry). Also, Nick Davis & Magic missed allot of footy due to injury. Ted will get his opportunity & if there's a great player there, Roosy will find it. The side needs to change to stay hungry.

                              Some great comments directed at those who were bagging his recruitment too. Don't compare Ted Richards to David Spriggs.
                              2005 will live forever (or until we win another premiership)

                              GO BLOODS!!!!!!!!

                              Comment

                              • goswannie14
                                Leadership Group
                                • Sep 2005
                                • 11166

                                #45
                                My sister is an Essendon supporter, she's not all that happy to see him go.
                                Does God believe in Atheists?

                                Comment

                                Working...