Sydney Swans Team List 2006

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BeeEmmAre
    Commentary Team Captain
    • Aug 2005
    • 2509

    Sydney Swans Team List 2006

    The Swans website has revealed the numbers each player will wear in 2006 and there has been the odd change.
    What do you think?
    I note that 14 stays in retirement and it is joined by Stuey Maxfield's 11, while the average age of our squad must be among the youngest in the competition, with only one player (Paul Williams) aged 30 or over as at February 1, 2006.
    Our average age is 22.21, or 23.05 if you don't count our nine rookies.
    Even Hawthorn, Geelong or St Kilda would have trouble matching this I reckon.

    SYDNEY SWANS
    1. Barry Hall (age 28)
    2. Nick Davis (25)
    3. Jarrad McVeigh (20)
    4. Ben Mathews (27)
    5. Ryan O?Keefe (24)
    6. Craig Bolton (25)
    7. Josh Willoughby (20)
    8. David Spriggs (25)
    9. Nick Malceski (21)
    10. Paul Williams (32)
    12. Nic Fosdike (25)
    13. Adam Schneider (21)
    15. Stephen Doyle (24)
    16. Darren Jolly (24)
    17. Tadhg Kennelly (24)
    18. Andrew Erickson (20)
    19. Michael O?Loughlin (28)
    20. Luke Ablett (23)
    21. Leo Barry (28)
    22. Matthew Laidlaw (18)
    23. Paul Chambers (23)
    24. Jude Bolton (25)
    25. Ted Richards (23)
    26. Sean Dempster (22)
    27. Kristin Thornton (17)
    28. Jared Crouch (27)
    29. Jonathon Simpkin-rookie (19)
    30. Lewis Roberts-Thomson (22)
    31. Brett Kirk (29)
    32. Amon Buchanan (23)
    33. Jarred Moore (19)
    34. Ryan Brabazon (19)
    35. James Wall-rookie (19)
    36. Tim Schmidt (19)
    37. Adam Goodes (26)
    38. Luke Vogels (22)
    39. Heath Grundy (19)
    40. Paul Currie-rookie (18)
    41. Ed Barlow-rookie (19)
    42. Paul Bevan (21)
    43. Stefan Garruba-rookie (19)
    44. Matthew Davis (19)
    45. Earl Shaw (19)
    46. Sam Rowe-rookie (19)
    47. Simon Phillips-rookie (18)
    48. Kieren Jack-rookie (18)
    49. Adam Prior-rookie (19)
    Last edited by BeeEmmAre; 1 February 2006, 08:36 PM.
    "It's up to the rest of the players in the room to make a new batch of premiership players next year," Adam Goodes, triple Bob Skilton Medallist, October 7, 2011.

    YOU BETCHA!!!!!!
  • OldE

    #2
    Re: Sydney Swans Team List 2006

    Originally posted by BeeEmmAre

    17. Tadgh Kennelly (24)
    How many times do we have to say it, it's H-G, like HG Wells or HG Nelson. Can the mods please add it to the swear filter??

    Comment

    • Sanecow
      Suspended by the MRP
      • Mar 2003
      • 6917

      #3
      Re: Sydney Swans Team List 2006

      Originally posted by BeeEmmAre
      49. Adam Prior-rookie (19)
      So what is he now?

      Comment

      • BeeEmmAre
        Commentary Team Captain
        • Aug 2005
        • 2509

        #4
        Re: Re: Sydney Swans Team List 2006

        Originally posted by eirinn
        How many times do we have to say it, it's H-G, like HG Wells or HG Nelson. Can the mods please add it to the swear filter??
        Happy now?


        Originally posted by sanecow
        So what is he now?
        A bloody good pick-up for zero outlay.
        Put me on record as being the first to say I reckon he'll make it.

        I'm certain no one has declared him Prior to this.
        "It's up to the rest of the players in the room to make a new batch of premiership players next year," Adam Goodes, triple Bob Skilton Medallist, October 7, 2011.

        YOU BETCHA!!!!!!

        Comment

        • Sanecow
          Suspended by the MRP
          • Mar 2003
          • 6917

          #5
          Pearls. Swine.

          Comment

          • Bleed Red Blood
            Senior Player
            • Sep 2003
            • 2057

            #6
            Re: Sydney Swans Team List 2006

            Originally posted by BeeEmmAre
            Twhile the average age of our squad must be among the youngest in the competition, with only one player (Paul Williams) aged 30 or over as at February 1, 2006.
            Our average age is 22.21, or 23.05 if you don't count our nine rookies.
            Even Hawthorn, Geelong or St Kilda would have trouble matching this I reckon.
            What does it really matter? The difference in average age is very insignificant. What is it, maybe 100 days between first and last? Pfft.

            Comment

            • satchmopugdog
              Bandicoots ears
              • Apr 2004
              • 3691

              #7
              I laughed Cow.
              "The Dog days are over, The Dog days are gone" Florence and the Machine

              Comment

              • Bleed Red Blood
                Senior Player
                • Sep 2003
                • 2057

                #8
                From http://footygeek.com/content/view/1929/83/ If you look at the table below, we can make some simple comparisons between all team lists for 2006. The first section shows how many teenagers are on each club’s primary list (excluding rookies). These guys are the future of the club, their...

                Comment

                • Charlie
                  On the Rookie List
                  • Jan 2003
                  • 4101

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Bleed Red Blood
                  http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/showpo...26&postcount=1
                  The age of the best 15-20 players is probably more important, but seeing as how I don't have enough interest to sit down and work it all out for 16 teams... mid-table is exactly where we should be. We're at our peak, we're a proven premiership-quality side and we have another two, maybe even three years in which to challenge for premierships. Good position.
                  We hate Anthony Rocca
                  We hate Shannon Grant too
                  We hate scumbag Gaspar
                  But Leo WE LOVE YOU!

                  Comment

                  • Nico
                    Veterans List
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 11312

                    #10
                    So they have retired No.11.

                    Fair dinkum that sucks. Stewie, in Jack Dyer's great parlance, was a good average player with leadership qualities. No superstar by any stretch of the imagination.
                    http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

                    Comment

                    • robbieando
                      The King
                      • Jan 2003
                      • 2750

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Nico
                      So they have retired No.11.

                      Fair dinkum that sucks. Stewie, in Jack Dyer's great parlance, was a good average player with leadership qualities. No superstar by any stretch of the imagination.
                      I think it would/should be a one year retirement in the manner the number 8 was retired for a season after Cresswell's retirement because of the respect he had earnt from those at the club.

                      Perfect way to honor a retiring club captain who had the highest respect from all of his teammates for his leadership and workrate around the club, regardless of how good he was on the field (which was better than "a good average player").

                      Perfectly deserved in my opinion
                      Once was, now elsewhere

                      Comment

                      • RogueSwan
                        McVeigh for Brownlow
                        • Apr 2003
                        • 4602

                        #12
                        I agree with Robbieando on this one. Let his number have a year off as a mark of respect. "good-average player" is a bit harsh. Maybe he was over his last year or so but I have always thought he was a high quality footy player.
                        "Fortunately, this is the internet, so knowing nothing is no obstacle to having an opinion!." Beerman 18-07-2017

                        Comment

                        Working...