If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Originally posted by NMWBloods Why did you quote me when you replied? I never said he was loose-ball get player nor a soft receiver. I said he's more than a pure receiver. He doesn't dive into packs, but that's not the only way to get the hard ball. It was others who said he a receiver only.
Yeah sorry Bloods...I thought it carried itself well. I was actually just trying to build on your point.
Originally posted by Sid this aint good, getting more midfielders and getting rid of backs....just what we need.
We really need to keep our backmen so we can't trade any of them for Akermanis. Also, would Akermanis be too expensive for Sydney? I believe I'd be happy with whatever the recruiting team decides (don't quote me on this when Akermanis comes and I think they made a stupid descision!).
Originally posted by Jon Yeah sorry Bloods...I thought it carried itself well. I was actually just trying to build on your point.
Ah okay - I see - no worries - I'm having a bit of a dumb day today (as you can see from my earlier post)!!
Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.
"[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."
We wouldn't be getting rid of our backmen. If we traded Nicks (a forward) and Mathews (more of a midfielder) then I can't see the problem. Neither of these mentioned are key position players and can be easily replaced. One thing about us is that we have a heap of flanker type players.
And another thing. If we recruit Aka every time we win a game it will be Aka this Aka that. It will be all about him. I rather the spotlight shines on someone else.
Comment