Warfe.

[bigswan]

Warfe

I stand by my statement on Warfe and to those saying that Nicks should have been traded or delisted, have a look at the replay of the Port final. On that form Nicks has a couple of seasons left.

[jimmytootle]

From some of the comments on this thread and others like it, you would have thought that Warfey had jilted their sister, or worse.

Warfey, if you're online, congrats on staying on for another year and let's look forward to a healthy and productive 2004 season

[jimmytootle]

Originally posted by robbieando
So was Bennett and Bomford won our 2nd Best and Fairest in 1996.

Oh yes, Bomford - tremendous player - should never have let him go.

[Destructive]

Originally posted by anne
Maybe they are charging us the $75 extra to pay for Warfe's salary.

On the pensioner rate its an extra $120, why is that?

[dimelb]

Originally posted by penga
you cant be serious about that statement

Sorry I'm a bit slow getting back Penga - I was thinking of the games against Brisbane at the SCG and Essendon. He didn't get a lot of ground time but there were a couple of nice deliveries.

[footyhead]

Originally posted by dimelb
I was thinking of the games against Brisbane at the SCG and Essendon. He didn't get a lot of ground time but there were a couple of nice deliveries.

Yeah Di , sure sure , Warfe is still good enough , thats right keep telling yourself that... cos that kind of attitude is what will stop our list improving and ultimatley keep us excatley where we have been for the past 23 years.

[Ajn]

He will be a back up player at best, as was outlined to him when he was often overlooked, as will Seymour and Nicks. That's why they were all offerred as trade bait.

I personally think Nicks can improve, but don't worry about our direction, it is for youth to build a solid foundation for the future.