Warfe.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Richard Davis
    On the Rookie List
    • Oct 2003
    • 174

    #16
    Warfe

    I stand by my statement on Warfe and to those saying that Nicks should have been traded or delisted, have a look at the replay of the Port final. On that form Nicks has a couple of seasons left.

    Comment

    • jimmytootle
      On the Rookie List
      • Oct 2003
      • 33

      #17
      From some of the comments on this thread and others like it, you would have thought that Warfey had jilted their sister, or worse.

      Warfey, if you're online, congrats on staying on for another year and let's look forward to a healthy and productive 2004 season

      Comment

      • jimmytootle
        On the Rookie List
        • Oct 2003
        • 33

        #18
        Originally posted by robbieando
        So was Bennett and Bomford won our 2nd Best and Fairest in 1996.
        Oh yes, Bomford - tremendous player - should never have let him go.

        Comment

        • Destructive
          Football Terrorist
          • Jan 2003
          • 976

          #19
          Originally posted by anne
          Maybe they are charging us the $75 extra to pay for Warfe's salary.
          On the pensioner rate its an extra $120, why is that?
          The Destructive Dan Experience - Featuring Teal.
          Add me on Facebook - Danny Pinsuti (Except Suzi Olsen and her split personalities.)
          238 AFL Games.

          Comment

          • dimelb
            pr. dim-melb; m not f
            • Jun 2003
            • 6889

            #20
            Originally posted by penga
            you cant be serious about that statement
            Sorry I'm a bit slow getting back Penga - I was thinking of the games against Brisbane at the SCG and Essendon. He didn't get a lot of ground time but there were a couple of nice deliveries.
            He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

            Comment

            • footyhead
              Banned indefinitely by Moderators for posting totally inappropriate material
              • May 2003
              • 1367

              #21
              Originally posted by dimelb
              I was thinking of the games against Brisbane at the SCG and Essendon. He didn't get a lot of ground time but there were a couple of nice deliveries.
              Yeah Di , sure sure , Warfe is still good enough , thats right keep telling yourself that... cos that kind of attitude is what will stop our list improving and ultimatley keep us excatley where we have been for the past 23 years.

              Comment

              • Ajn
                Draft Scout
                • Jan 2003
                • 711

                #22
                He will be a back up player at best, as was outlined to him when he was often overlooked, as will Seymour and Nicks. That's why they were all offerred as trade bait.

                I personally think Nicks can improve, but don't worry about our direction, it is for youth to build a solid foundation for the future.
                Staying ahead of the game...

                Comment

                Working...