Swans delist Seymour

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DST
    The voice of reason!
    • Jan 2003
    • 2705

    Swans delist Seymour

    Seems like that will be it now, probably a good idea considering James has been elevated can't afford to many players that are under an injury cloud.



    DST
    "Looking forward to a rebuilt, new, fast and exciting Swans model in 2010"

  • GoBloods
    On the Rookie List
    • Jul 2003
    • 244

    #2
    seymour delisted

    i heard on radio , 11am news ,that swans have delisted brad seymour and that he intends to relocate to melbourne to possibly further his career

    Comment

    • Bart
      CHHHOMMMMMPPP!!!!
      • Feb 2003
      • 1360

      #3
      Re: Swans delist Seymour

      Originally posted by DST
      Seems like that will be it now, probably a good idea considering James has been elevated can't afford to many players that are under an injury cloud.



      DST
      Not that surprised really. Good luck Brad. A tough nut defender who unfortunately was injured when we needed his toughness.

      Its pretty clear that the club did try and get something for him in the trade period to no avail.

      Comment

      • penga
        Senior Player
        • Jan 2003
        • 2601

        #4
        IMO, it shouldve really happened last year, oh well, good luck snapper in the future...
        C'mon Chels!

        Comment

        • Mike_B
          Peyow Peyow
          • Jan 2003
          • 6267

          #5
          A very valuable member of the club when fit - unfortunately that was not very often at all over the past few years.

          Thanks for the 10 years Snapper (you've got Life Membership now as recognition of that), and best of luck!

          I'm on the Chandwagon!!!

          If you cannot compete for the premiership, it's better to be young and exciting than middle-aged and dowdy.

          Comment

          • Rizzo
            On the Rookie List
            • Jan 2003
            • 655

            #6
            Looks like he will be melbourne bound and left the club on good terms.

            Comment

            • Ryan Bomford
              On the Rookie List
              • Sep 2003
              • 652

              #7
              One of the last of '96 GF team. Didn't realise he was still so young (27). May pick up an opportunity on one of the rebuilding Melbourne sides.

              Comment

              • TheMase
                Senior Player
                • Jan 2003
                • 1207

                #8
                I think this could be a decent sign that we will pick up someone in the pre-season draft.

                May be Ray Hall ...

                Good luck to Brad. I wouldn't count his chances of getting a big chance at another club, but hopefully for him it will work out.

                I don't think we have lost THAT much there, just getting rid of more old wood off our list (why couldn't warfe go!!)

                Comment

                • CureTheSane
                  Carpe Noctem
                  • Jan 2003
                  • 5032

                  #9
                  Only yesterday I posted how Paul Licuria was the only Swan I can remember who we lost and I really wanted to keep.
                  Now there are two

                  But I understand the POV from both the club and the player, and hope he comes back as strong as ever (but is pummelled by a Swan when playing against us )
                  The difference between insanity and genius is measured only in success.

                  Comment

                  • Cheer Cheer
                    On the Rookie List
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 934

                    #10
                    I was hoping there would be a footnote at the bottom of the article saying also in other news rowan warfe has been let go too...
                    No.1 ticket holder of Nick Davis Fan Club...

                    Comment

                    • midaro
                      On the Rookie List
                      • Jan 2003
                      • 1042

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Cheer Cheer
                      I was hoping there would be a footnote at the bottom of the article saying also in other news rowan warfe has been let go too...
                      Same.

                      I always read the delisting order as:

                      Warfe - Certain
                      Seymour - 50/50
                      Nicks - Unlikely, but possible

                      Whoever gave Warfe that three year deal should be put up against a wall and shot.

                      Comment

                      • Ryan Bomford
                        On the Rookie List
                        • Sep 2003
                        • 652

                        #12
                        Maybe the SWANS are doing too good a job in 'list management'. I'm getting confused, how many vacancies do we now have on the player and rookie lists? Is there enough talent around this year to fill the vacant spots?

                        Comment

                        • TheMase
                          Senior Player
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 1207

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Ryan Bomford
                          Maybe the SWANS are doing too good a job in 'list management'. I'm getting confused, how many vacancies do we now have on the player and rookie lists? Is there enough talent around this year to fill the vacant spots?
                          Departing:

                          Cresswell, MacPherson, Hunt, Seymour, Buchanan.
                          + spare spot on list at start of season = 6 places

                          James and Meiklejohn promoted = 4 places

                          We have 4 draft picks.

                          Or we could use 3 of them and get a player in the pre-season draft.

                          Comment

                          • timthefish
                            Regular in the Side
                            • Sep 2003
                            • 940

                            #14
                            Originally posted by TheMase
                            Departing:

                            Cresswell, MacPherson, Hunt, Seymour, Buchanan.
                            + spare spot on list at start of season = 6 places

                            James and Meiklejohn promoted = 4 places

                            We have 4 draft picks.

                            Or we could use 3 of them and get a player in the pre-season draft.
                            and stevens too? = 5 spots.
                            then again, i think it would be worth trying 15-16 players on field so what would i know

                            Comment

                            • Rod_
                              Senior Player
                              • Jan 2003
                              • 1179

                              #15
                              I would have liked to have seen him fit and on the field - but agree that we don't need too many 50 / 50 players... I would say that he was dissapointed on being touted as tradable and this is his choice to get another chance.......?

                              At the start of this season I would have had him in my starting 22 and having a shocking season with injuries has also helped him talk the swans into delisting him?? No fact but speculation!!

                              Best of luck to Brad and family - My guess 30 to 70 % chance of rebirth at another club?

                              Rod_

                              Comment

                              Working...