We're in "Inside Football"

[Ruck'n'Roll]

Originally posted by Foreign Legion
I don't think Ricky Mott is a dud - I just think he is a 1970's footballer trying to play modern football.

The question is . . . which 70's footballer Bary Round or Mick Molan?

[DST]

Originally posted by anne
No-one can. But he must be popular at the club. He got married about 2 weeks in country Victoria (maybe Bendigo) and it showed his wedding on the news and practically the whole Swans team was there!

Yes we can, it is very easy and I will spell it out to you.

WARFE HAS A CONTRACT FOR 2004!!!!!!

Once we were not able to trade for somone like him in the draft we were never going to cut him, 16 players on our list at the start of next year will have played 25 games or less (8 will have not debuted).

No way were we going to go around next year cutting Warfe (which was going to cost us cash) and then draft another youngster, we just have to many of them on the list. Any more and you end up like St Kilda a couple of years ago, just a rabble.

Hope this helps to clear up the confusion.

DST

[Plugger46]

Firstly, Nico you're an arsehole, and officially off the Christmas list. As for you Roscoe, well I'm not going to bother with a dropkick like yourself.

Like to clear a couple of things up.

Ricky Mott played one season and I recall most supporters (including Nico, during the season) being on the Mott bandwagon. He was 21 and sure he liked a beer, but you just have to be careful of getting rid of 6' 8" ruckmen. I like Roos, but fair dinkum Nico, you are that far up Roos' arse it's not funny, and it's about time you tried to form a balanced opinion with a preparedness to question Roos on certain issues. Dennis Pagan has obviously thought enough of Mott to give him a second opportunity. Don't forget Pagan's decision on players such as Martin Pike, who had similar problems. Can't he play either?

Also don't forget Nico, you have been wrong before. eg: Andrew Dunkley, Brett Kirk were two blokes you bagged unmercifully in the early stages of their respective careers, saying that neither of them were any good. And in more recent times, you have berated a number of players from other teams and the one that readily comes to mind is Mathew Scarlett, who just happened to be the All-Australian full-back.

Nico, on Barry, Crouch and Mathews- well you gave them an absolute towelling at the football, more specifically Mathews and quite frankly you didn't have the balls to bring it up on the site.

On the subject of 'teddy's', I have it on good authority that you actually wear one.

As for Warfe, I was prepared to give him a go after coming back from injury, as he played some good football for us in the late '90's, it was as simple as that. Not once did I say that he was a star or anything of the sort. People on this site have a tendency to take things out of context.

[Plugger46]

Originally posted by Cheer Cheer
He didn't at Fremantle, I can't see much changing.

Pretty hard to do it from the Rookie List. He spent the year Killing sides in the WAFL.

[Cheer Cheer]

Yeh he was killing so many sides - Fremantle let him go...

[motorace_182]

Still, I wish him luck as I think Carlton need it!

Let em sit there, the longer their feral supporters sit in the cellar and feel what we once did, the better, screw em!!

[Dpw]

Originally posted by Cheer Cheer
Yeh he was killing so many sides - Fremantle let him go...

In fact he was so crap he was the state of orgin ruckman for WA

[sharp9]

Fremantle didn't let him go, they offered him a one year contract, which he turned down because he was confident of getting rafted by the Blues....just clearing that up.