O'Keefe Pocketing Rave Reviews

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sharp9
    Senior Player
    • Jan 2003
    • 2508

    #16
    Originally posted by monopoly19
    But then there was that article on Saddo, and he came out and played a blinder against the Kangas.
    Wasn't there a big "I'm gonna have a blinder this year" article earlier in the year before a really poor performance that generated long threads?

    If memory serves (and in a desparate attempt to prove that I am right) I would suggest thast the Saddo argument from the pre Roos article is the perfect demonstration of my formula....why? Well the Fosdike, Jude, Saddo stories just before a shocker, were saying how fabulous they were.....On the other hand Saddo's pre Roos artcle was along the lines of, "Things are crap right now, I haven't put in, I'm not sure wher I belong on the field, I guess we'll give it one last throw of the dice...etc...etc"

    To summarise Sharp9's immutable Law of Media (2004); "Whatever is said in print about a young Swan in a feature article will immediately be contradicted on the playing field at the first available opportunity."
    "I'll acknowledge there are more talented teams in the competition but I won't acknowledge that there is a better team in the competition" Paul Roos March 2005

    Comment

    • monopoly19
      Senior Player
      • Aug 2003
      • 1098

      #17
      Originally posted by sharp9
      To summarise Sharp9's immutable Law of Media (2004); "Whatever is said in print about a young Swan in a feature article will immediately be contradicted on the playing field at the first available opportunity."
      It would be nice if they didn't sacrifice their games just to make the media look bad

      Comment

      Working...