Originally posted by monopoly19
But then there was that article on Saddo, and he came out and played a blinder against the Kangas.
But then there was that article on Saddo, and he came out and played a blinder against the Kangas.
If memory serves (and in a desparate attempt to prove that I am right) I would suggest thast the Saddo argument from the pre Roos article is the perfect demonstration of my formula....why? Well the Fosdike, Jude, Saddo stories just before a shocker, were saying how fabulous they were.....On the other hand Saddo's pre Roos artcle was along the lines of, "Things are crap right now, I haven't put in, I'm not sure wher I belong on the field, I guess we'll give it one last throw of the dice...etc...etc"
To summarise Sharp9's immutable Law of Media (2004); "Whatever is said in print about a young Swan in a feature article will immediately be contradicted on the playing field at the first available opportunity."

Comment