The end of optimism

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Go Swannies
    Veterans List
    • Sep 2003
    • 5697

    The end of optimism

    I know some people here will regard this as "the start of the excuses" but I no longer see how we can win on Sunday. Bazza is, at best, 50:50 to play and we still don't have our fullback back. Schneider, one of our best crumbers, is out and if Nick Davis plays he'll be doing so carrying an injury. Goodes is far from 100% and there's no Saddo. Nic Fosdike will be back but he's just getting over tonsilitis so can't be 100%.

    And we're playing a team in top form with very few injuries and no suspensions (for a change). Just trying to rearrange the forward line without Bazza (bring alternating Doyle or Ball to FF?) will be a challenge for Roos.

    If we get close this Sunday Paul Roos is a genius.
  • lizz
    Veteran
    Site Admin
    • Jan 2003
    • 16738

    #2
    We were understrength against Port last year as well, though admittedly not by as much.

    If Bazza plays I reckon we're in with a chance. Without him it will take a miracle.

    Comment

    • Ryan Bomford
      On the Rookie List
      • Sep 2003
      • 652

      #3
      Ah yes, this game is shaping up as the stuff that dreams of - the perfect start in our charge to the premiership ....

      Comment

      • Schneidergirl
        On the Rookie List
        • Aug 2003
        • 468

        #4
        Originally posted by lizz
        We were understrength against Port last year as well, though admittedly not by as much.

        If Bazza plays I reckon we're in with a chance. Without him it will take a miracle.
        Agree.

        I really don't want to think about how we are going to play if we loose Hall through suspension!

        I'm staying positive though... just.

        Comment

        • Go Swannies
          Veterans List
          • Sep 2003
          • 5697

          #5
          Originally posted by Ryan Bomford
          Ah yes, this game is shaping up as the stuff that dreams of - the perfect start in our charge to the premiership ....

          Comment

          • Bart
            CHHHOMMMMMPPP!!!!
            • Feb 2003
            • 1360

            #6
            There are not many reasons why you would pick us to win.

            However, (and I've mentioned this in another thread) the teams don't differ to much from last year. We are hurt by injuries and both sides have had a retirement or two. Presuming teams line up as last week

            Swans

            Out: Cresswell, Roberts-Thomson, Saddington, Schauble, Schneider, Sundqvist
            In: Maxfield, Bevan, Buchanan, Doyle, McVeigh, Ablett

            Saints

            Out: Black, Burke, Peckett, Lawrence, Montagna
            In: Knobel, Baker, Penny, Schwarze, Ball

            Kirk held Hayes to 11 touches. We won 15.22 (112) 9.7 (61)

            Now I know St Kilda have come on in leaps and bounds, but they stack up pretty poorly against us historically.

            They are playing us at the SCG, a very different proposition to other grounds and where we have an 80% record for the 2003 and 2004 seasons. In addition St Kilda have beaten us once in the last 6 seasons, and haven't won at the SCG since 1998

            Comment

            • Sanecow
              Suspended by the MRP
              • Mar 2003
              • 6917

              #7
              Re: The end of optimism

              Originally posted by Go Swannies
              there's no Saddo
              Didn't everyone want him dropped anyway? FMD! When Saddo is playing he's crap but when he's injured it's enough to stop us winning our next game. Which is it people?

              Comment

              • Thunder Shaker
                Aut vincere aut mori
                • Apr 2004
                • 4160

                #8
                Bombers 2000

                We had the same situation against the all-conquering Bombers side of 2000. We went into that match with seven of our best side out through injury.

                Incredibly, we were actually in front in the last quarter, before the Bombers overhauled us. We lost by 13 points, but it was a very brave loss, considering that nobody had beaten the Bombers to that stage of the season and we were depleted by injury.

                Can we do the same again? I hope so, but I cannot be remotely optimistic until after the tribunal has had its say.
                "Unbelievable!" -- Nick Davis leaves his mark on the 2005 semi final

                Comment

                • Schneidergirl
                  On the Rookie List
                  • Aug 2003
                  • 468

                  #9
                  Re: Re: The end of optimism

                  Originally posted by Sanecow
                  Didn't everyone want him dropped anyway? FMD! When Saddo is playing he's crap but when he's injured it's enough to stop us winning our next game. Which is it people?
                  Not everyone... all I wanted was him to punch the ball in our backline rather than try and mark.
                  I think you'll find there a lot more Saddo lovers than haters...

                  Comment

                  • Go Swannies
                    Veterans List
                    • Sep 2003
                    • 5697

                    #10
                    Re: Re: The end of optimism

                    Originally posted by Sanecow
                    Didn't everyone want him dropped anyway? FMD! When Saddo is playing he's crap but when he's injured it's enough to stop us winning our next game. Which is it people?
                    Not me. As I've previously posted, in the past few weeks I've seen Saddo and Nicks as the mature glue that's helping our midfield lift.

                    Read on - I also say that a recovering Fossie is a worry too. But not one snide comment?

                    But the big worry is a complete rebalancing of our forwards. Even a Bazza being largely inefficient as he was on Saturday is still a focal point up there. How does Roos rebalance the team if he goes?

                    Comment

                    • Ryan Bomford
                      On the Rookie List
                      • Sep 2003
                      • 652

                      #11
                      Re: Bombers 2000

                      Originally posted by Thunder Shaker
                      We had the same situation against the all-conquering Bombers side of 2000. We went into that match with seven of our best side out through injury.

                      Incredibly, we were actually in front in the last quarter, before the Bombers overhauled us. We lost by 13 points, but it was a very brave loss, considering that nobody had beaten the Bombers to that stage of the season and we were depleted by injury.

                      Can we do the same again? I hope so, but I cannot be remotely optimistic until after the tribunal has had its say.
                      I'm with you on the optimism front - with or without Hall.

                      Let's not forget the pathetic exhibitions of football that the Aints have put up against the Swans in the last few seasons - bar this one of course. Remember the infamous draw as a spectacle, from a few years ago?

                      Without Hall we will need to play a similar type of football - excessive flooding, frequent stoppages, staging for frees (did I say that?) and all the other garbage that characterised the Saints play from 1999 onward.

                      Won't be pretty but they'll be getting their own back.

                      Comment

                      • Bear
                        Best and Fairest
                        • Feb 2003
                        • 1022

                        #12
                        This is the sort of game that we will get 'up' for and I think we'll make it a real contest.
                        "As a player he simply should not have been able to do the things he did. Leo was a 185cm, 88kg full-back and played on some of the biggest, fastest and best full-forwards of all time, and constantly beat them." Roos.
                        Leo Barry? you star! We'll miss ya, ''Leapin''.

                        Comment

                        • Glenn
                          ROLLLLLL TIDE!!!!!!!!!!!!
                          • Mar 2003
                          • 2443

                          #13
                          Maybe I am a internal optomist, but I am quitely confident of a good showing vs the Saints, after the Saints 100+ point demolition of Carlton, they may not be as up for this game as otherwise considering injuries and possible suspension. Write off the Swans at your own peril
                          Premiers 09,18,33,05

                          "You Irish Twit", Quote attributed to a RWO member who shall remain nameless.

                          Comment

                          • RogueSwan
                            McVeigh for Brownlow
                            • Apr 2003
                            • 4602

                            #14
                            If Hall does go (no, pleeeeaase no), it will just leave a perfect opportunity for a player or two to step up. For me I hope its Nicksy or James or Doyle. Not necessarily as CHF, but just to fill in for the loss of talent,presence and effort that Hall provides (if he is out),
                            "Fortunately, this is the internet, so knowing nothing is no obstacle to having an opinion!." Beerman 18-07-2017

                            Comment

                            • Go Swannies
                              Veterans List
                              • Sep 2003
                              • 5697

                              #15
                              Rowan Warfe on the way back in?

                              Comment

                              Working...