Forward line

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bleed Red Blood
    Senior Player
    • Sep 2003
    • 2057

    Forward line

    I'm of the opinion that we need to be blooding Aaron Rogers/LRT as a forward.

    We lack a full forward in my opinion. Which can be very detrimentel to the team.

    Brisbane for example have Bradshaw,Brown,Lynch,Pike,Michael and Leppa playing KP.

    Bradshaw,Pike and Leppstich can be thrown forward if needed against us because they arent needed on a Davis or Micky O.

    In the future, Schneids(when are we going to see him again?), ROK and possibly Davo will play midfield after the retirments of Willo and Maxy.

    So our structure would be something like

    ? .... Hall .... Davis
    O"loughlin..... ? ..... ?

    In the meentime we may draft a full forward, but we are a very small forward line at the moment.

    Thoughts, comments?
  • lizz
    Veteran
    Site Admin
    • Jan 2003
    • 16795

    #2
    The way the game is played nowadays, almost every player on the ground, apart from maybe one key forward and one key backman, will drift into the midfield at some point during the game. Players like Davis and O'Keefe have shown they are able to do that, but I suspect they will remain primarily as forwards rather than move to be full-time midfielders. I think it is players like Willoughby, Schmidt, Schneider, maybe Buchanan who will be pencilled in to step up in the midfield when Willo and Maxfield retire.

    Looking forward even further, where is the next Bazza going to come from? Hall is now 27 and hopefully has another 5 or 6 years left in him now. But it's no good looking around for the next FF/CHF when he retires. They probably need to draft a seriously promising 17/18yo KPP or two in the next 12 months, give him a couple of years to develop some strength and then another two or three playing senior football as a back-up to Hall so that he is ready to become a dominant forward when Hall retires.

    In my time following the Swans, the two key forwards have been Plugger and Hall - neither home-grown. It would be great to see the next one brought in young and developed in-house.

    Comment

    • Bleed Red Blood
      Senior Player
      • Sep 2003
      • 2057

      #3
      Originally posted by lizz
      Looking forward even further, where is the next Bazza going to come from? Hall is now 27 and hopefully has another 5 or 6 years left in him now. But it's no good looking around for the next FF/CHF when he retires. They probably need to draft a seriously promising 17/18yo KPP or two in the next 12 months, give him a couple of years to develop some strength and then another two or three playing senior football as a back-up to Hall so that he is ready to become a dominant forward when Hall retires.


      In my time following the Swans, the two key forwards have been Plugger and Hall - neither home-grown. It would be great to see the next one brought in young and developed in-house.
      Why not Rogers or LRT?

      Comment

      • Dpw
        On the Rookie List
        • Jan 2003
        • 829

        #4
        Originally posted by Bleed Red Blood
        Why not Rogers or LRT?
        Rogers future if he is to have one will most likely be down back after Melbourne had no luck with him up forward.

        LRT - maybe but yet again Roo's has signaled CHB for him in the furture.

        IMO the answer lay's elsewhere Iam not sure where and at preseant is not a major concern, we have more pressing probs

        Comment

        • Bleed Red Blood
          Senior Player
          • Sep 2003
          • 2057

          #5
          Originally posted by Dpw
          Rogers future if he is to have one will most likely be down back after Melbourne had no luck with him up forward.

          LRT - maybe but yet again Roo's has signaled CHB for him in the furture.

          IMO the answer lay's elsewhere Iam not sure where and at preseant is not a major concern, we have more pressing probs
          So you're saying if Rogers is to be a permanent player for us, he will be played back along with Goodes,LRT and James for 8 years?

          Comment

          • chammond
            • Jan 2003
            • 1368

            #6
            Originally posted by Bleed Red Blood
            So you're saying if Rogers is to be a permanent player for us, he will be played back along with Goodes,LRT and James for 8 years?
            Er . . . Goodes is only playing defence while he rebuilds his fitness, and the others can't even get a game in the seniors.

            Chances are none of them will be "played back" for the Swans over the next 8 years.

            Comment

            • Bleed Red Blood
              Senior Player
              • Sep 2003
              • 2057

              #7
              Originally posted by chammond
              Er . . . Goodes is only playing defence while he rebuilds his fitness, and the others can't even get a game in the seniors.

              Chances are none of them will be "played back" for the Swans over the next 8 years.
              If Goodes is rebuilding his fitness and is enjoying playing back there who knows whether he will be moved again.

              Just because LRT,Rogers and James arent getting games now doesn't mean they wont be integrel parts of the team in the future.

              Comment

              • Bleed Red Blood
                Senior Player
                • Sep 2003
                • 2057

                #8
                I noticed that Sharpie was getting at what I was saying in my original post in this thread.

                I believe it to be a very big problem, we need a KP full forward, or even if Doyle/Ball were played out of the goalsquare for now.

                It doesn't help with Cornes able to go forward agaisnt our short back line.

                Comment

                • hemsleys
                  It's Goodes to cheer!!
                  • Sep 2003
                  • 23665

                  #9
                  Yeah, Today showed that if Hall doen't get it thyen no one else does.

                  Noone to keep the pressure on in the F50 like last week.

                  Comment

                  • swans_premiers
                    On the Rookie List
                    • Feb 2003
                    • 1101

                    #10
                    I tell ya, O'loughlin is a VERY important player...we NEED him out there.
                    Adam Goodes: Rising Star 99, Brownlow 2003, 2006
                    Swans Premiers 1909, 1918,1933,2005, 2012

                    Comment

                    • Captain
                      Captain of the Side
                      • Feb 2004
                      • 3602

                      #11
                      Originally posted by swans_premiers
                      I tell ya, O'loughlin is a VERY important player...we NEED him out there.
                      Finally someone has it right.

                      Mick is a superstar when he is on fire. He is so creative, skillful and demands respect, along with a good defender.

                      Fact is, if we had a second tall forward, Cornes most likely would have played CHB. People can talk about rotating players through the midfield till the cows come home, however we lack tall marking targets up forward.

                      Brisbane - Lynch, Brown, Bradshaw
                      StKilda - Hammil, Gehrig, Reiwoldt
                      Port - Treadrea, Cornes
                      Essendon - Lloyd, Lucas, Hird

                      If we are to be a top 4 side we need a couple of marking forwards.

                      Comment

                      • Go Swannies
                        Veterans List
                        • Sep 2003
                        • 5697

                        #12
                        One of the most revealing stats about today was that there was nowehere near as much difference in the forward 50 figures as the scores suggested. With Baz up the ground trying to get the ball we really missed not having Magic or Schneider or a half fit Nick D or a performing Pebbles.

                        Strangely, this was one of the weeks when if Baz did get the ball he didn't kick across the ground to give him time to get back into the goal square. But we offered so little challenge that Port had a few extra players ready to go on him anyway.

                        Not having a full forward, a ruckman or a fullback is a bit of a problem when you're playing a halfway decent team.

                        Comment

                        • sharpie
                          On the Rookie List
                          • Jul 2003
                          • 1588

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Bleed Red Blood
                          I noticed that Sharpie was getting at what I was saying in my original post in this thread.

                          I believe it to be a very big problem, we need a KP full forward, or even if Doyle/Ball were played out of the goalsquare for now.

                          It doesn't help with Cornes able to go forward agaisnt our short back line.
                          Bingo.

                          Team structure was massacred this week with the injuries.
                          Visit my eBay store -

                          10% off for mentioning RWO when you buy. Great Christmas presents!

                          Comment

                          • swansrule100
                            The quarterback
                            • May 2004
                            • 4538

                            #14
                            we need a full forward type now...even an average one...just a solid player...maybe like a justin longmuir or someone... just a tall to compliment hall...leaving him as our best...and hopefully oloughlin and nicks alongside..

                            perhaps if saddington comes back and hits the best he can he could even do it... tho maybe not his best role...

                            also we would need to recruit a young gun as someone mentioned before to breed for halls replacement..perhaps so they can play in the same team as hall...much like we did with anthony rocca for lockett except pick a non sook who wont go home
                            Theres not much left to say

                            Comment

                            • dimelb
                              pr. dim-melb; m not f
                              • Jun 2003
                              • 6889

                              #15
                              If we follow the tradition and get our FF from StK, I'd go for Riewoldt. In any case, it's not a fixed position these days. It seems to me that Baz and Micky play in tandem, one up, one back, and mix it around.
                              He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

                              Comment

                              Working...