Phew!!!

[swansrule100]

Originally posted by Dpw
I know and I was just giving you mine

i know cheers

[Tarrant Magpie]

hey Sharp9 what is a wist anyway?

Well can we also have a fit prestigiacomo? a fit O'Bree? a fit Rocca? a fit Davidson?

GO THE PIES

[swansrule100]

Originally posted by Tarrant Magpie
what a predictable response sharp9.

i've only been following football for 17 years, go to every swans game in sydney and read the footy news everyday on line.

Not having a sook - and i'm not a loser, and i've got a pretty good life thanks. why can't i post on here, i take a keen interest in the swans results. i'll be at the next home game cheering them on actually against the crows.

I'm just venting my frustration at how bad the pies are playing this year. I don't mind being abused but childish posts such as yours are pathetic. funny as well to see your reaction too. Swans to win 2004-07...hmmm Brisbane are going to win (hey i don't know anything about football do I.......

GO THE PIES!

yeh well collingwood want to be involved in everything else may as well take this forum as well hey...

if you so involved why are you only here now and to complain about losing? :P

ur post seemed pretty sooky to me... basically complaining about the game and not accepting that collingwood were outplayed and just couldnt hack it

[penga]

Originally posted by JF_Bay22_SCG
Everyone was saying it was a bad game of footy. I thought it was really intense.

i thought the same, it was a great arm wrestle contest

doyle is very important and belongs in our best 22, sure he isnt winning much ball around the ground but it would be contrary to our game plan if he were... do you want him to be one of the links in the handball chain rebounding off half back? taking a mark at CHF, while blocking hall's space? we dont need a high possession winning ruckman, we need a good tap ruckman, IMO ...

[sharpie]

Originally posted by Tarrant Magpie
Hey Sharpie

Yeah we deserve to be 14th, but we will finsh higher than that this year.

"Party like 1933" - that is funny too. At least i saw my team win a premiership 1990....hahaha 1933. You might be waiting until 2033.......

btw, r u doing any comedy routines at any clubs to support your very witty and highly repartee? well don't bother

Of course "Party like 1933" is meant to be a joke. We gotta laugh about it somehow or else we'd go insane. Geez if thats the best comeback you have to my post, thats pretty pathetic. Go back and play with Joffa and friends. Best 14th team ever, haha. I cant believe so many people can be brainwashed by mick malthouse. 14th and best in the same sentence, haha.

But thanks for the confidence in my comedy. I've always thought it was B grade at best.

[swansrule100]

i think doyle should win more taps and contol the ruck more... he did well in the last quarter v collingwood and can improve i just think he needs to make a better contest more consistently

i also just wondered if people thought we needed him...

in an ideal world ball could ruck a game non stop and that way we fit in an extra player

[liz]

Originally posted by swansrule100

in an ideal world ball could ruck a game non stop and that way we fit in an extra player

I don't think there is a single player in the game who could ruck a whole game with the way it is played at the moment. On a few occasions players have to ruck substantially all the game due to another's injury, but even then the coach will normally try to give them a few minutes rest, or find someone else who can help out with rucking in the backline or forward line.

So yes, we do need Doyle - or for Goodes to regrow his ligament or for MJ or Erikson to turn into AFL ruckmen overnight.

[swansrule100]

be good if LRT continues to develop hed be good in the ruck for the end of each quarter

[TheHood]

Originally posted by sharp9
You are an ignorant idiot who knows nothing about football. You do, however, know how to be a bad loser...gee, you must be a Collingwood fan.

You can have Tarrant...we'll have Schauble, Davis, Schneider, Saddington, Buchanan and a fully fit Goodes, Barry and Williams (you can have Rocca fully fit if you want). Fair swap you @@@@in' stupid ****?

Lucky? We missed three straightforward shots for goal (same as you). Umpires??? you are @@@@in' joking. The Nicks one was a free. He was TACKLED AROUND THE WIST AND BROUGHT TO GROUND by the defender...if he didn't hold the mark then he is tackled without the ball. Pretty simple really.

Three Collingwood goals from incorrect umpiring decisions. Get a life. you are a loser.

Tarrant elbowed a player in the head. Watch the video you loser. Maybe he should have got one week as no injury was done. He was not going for the ball he got nowhere near it and decided to give the defender one, it's very obvious.

I thought this board had a policy of being a more welcoming forum than the sewerage written above.

Tarrant Magpie is certainly entitled to his opinion and deserves the respect of us all as we expect from others. Wasn't so long ago that we were complaining about some poor umpiring and unlucky incidents against the Dons.

Those personal insults long after the heat of the battle from a winning Swans supporter are so disappointing it's not funny.

Sydney is a transient town and there are lots of Melbourne ex-pats here. My best mate who gets along to the footy with me every week was torn in 2 on Saturday night because his original love is the Pies. And no it's not T.M. because my mate doesn't have the techno skills to operate an electric toothbrush let alone find an online board.

Let's play nice, the game is over and the best side won. That's usually the way these games work out.

[dendol]

Originally posted by TheHood
I thought this board had a policy of being a more welcoming forum than the sewerage written above.

Tarrant Magpie is certainly entitled to his opinion and deserves the respect of us all as we expect from others. Wasn't so long ago that we were complaining about some poor umpiring and unlucky incidents against the Dons.

Those personal insults long after the heat of the battle from a winning Swans supporter are so disappointing it's not funny.

Sydney is a transient town and there are lots of Melbourne ex-pats here. My best mate who gets along to the footy with me every week was torn in 2 on Saturday night because his original love is the Pies. And no it's not T.M. because my mate doesn't have the techno skills to operate an electric toothbrush let alone find an online board.

Let's play nice, the game is over and the best side won. That's usually the way these games work out.

well said. Even though I dont agree with anything Tarrant Magpie said, lets leave the personal attacks to the bigfooty forums ey.

[sharp9]

No. Opposition supporters coming here and moaning is not on.

If they want a debate - fine. We have lots of opposition supporters here, (we don't ban them like, um COLLINGWOOD"S BOARD!!!!!) but when they come to our board after losing to say words to the effect of "you were lucky to win, we are better than you even though we are 14th at the moment" and then have the gall to talk about umpires and tribunal decisions...(from a Collingwood supporter, strewth!) then they are the ones who can go very unpleasantly back to bigfooty. That behaviour (the whinging and inability to appreciate the other team's contribution and the lack of graciousnes in defeat) are very much the beahviour of a loser in the football supporter world. Good luck in the rest of your life, it is not relevant to my comment.

The point missed, Tarrant - Lover is that a (practically) full strength Collingwood actually played as well as they can play but still lost to an enormously undermanned Sydney side.

And then you suggest that a bloke who has played a quarter of football in his life might have made a difference. Doesn't that really spell out how thin the ranks are at Collingwood? If you want to go there then you would have to consider Sundqvist and Malceski (both out for the season with knee injuries...they are Sydney players you probably haven't heard of) coming in for the Swans....obviously their loss has not had any impact on last Saturday...hence I didn't mention them.

The pies tackled and restricted the Swans run really well (but it wasn't enough)...they got a fair bit of run and had the ball in space in the midfield a lot (but it still wasn't enough).

My reading is that it is the Swans who can improve more than the Pies from here...both in terms of how well the players played on Saturday night and in terms of the players to come back from injury.

For example I would think that the clanger count went against the Swans (I haven't seen the stat).

My apologies for misspelling WAIST. I notice that you don't disagree with my interpretation on that one.

Hi TheHood, you are right, my earlier post was sewerage....but still it is true sewarge. Regrets that I have sunk so low.

[swansrule100]

Originally posted by sharp9
No. Opposition supporters coming here and moaning is not on.

If they want a debate - fine. We have lots of opposition supporters here, (we don't ban them like, um COLLINGWOOD"S BOARD!!!!!) but when they come to our board after losing to say words to the effect of "you were lucky to win, we are better than you even though we are 14th at the moment" and then have the gall to talk about umpires and tribunal decisions...(from a Collingwood supporter, strewth!) then they are the ones who can go very unpleasantly back to bigfooty. That behaviour (the whinging and inability to appreciate the other team's contribution and the lack of graciousnes in defeat) are very much the beahviour of a loser in the football supporter world. Good luck in the rest of your life, it is not relevant to my comment.

The point missed, Tarrant - Lover is that a (practically) full strength Collingwood actually played as well as they can play but still lost to an enormously undermanned Sydney side.

And then you suggest that a bloke who has played a quarter of football in his life might have made a difference. Doesn't that really spell out how thin the ranks are at Collingwood? If you want to go there then you would have to consider Sundqvist and Malceski (both out for the season with knee injuries...they are Sydney players you probably haven't heard of) coming in for the Swans....obviously their loss has not had any impact on last Saturday...hence I didn't mention them.

The pies tackled and restricted the Swans run really well (but it wasn't enough)...they got a fair bit of run and had the ball in space in the midfield a lot (but it still wasn't enough).

My reading is that it is the Swans who can improve more than the Pies from here...both in terms of how well the players played on Saturday night and in terms of the players to come back from injury.

For example I would think that the clanger count went against the Swans (I haven't seen the stat).

My apologies for misspelling WAIST. I notice that you don't disagree with my interpretation on that one.

Hi TheHood, you are right, my earlier post was sewerage....but still it is true sewarge. Regrets that I have sunk so low.

i agreed with everything you said really... a collingwood person comes on here and sooks he lost and basically says it was a rubbish game with a rubbish crowd and poor umpiring and so on is hardley extending the hand of friendship

[penga]

Originally posted by swansrule100
in an ideal world ball could ruck a game non stop and that way we fit in an extra player

i disagree, ball gets smashed in the centre, doyle doesnt. if it were an ideal world, wouldnt you want a ruckman in the centre "non stop" who would actually get the tap out?

[swansrule100]

are u saying doyle is better than ball?


well in a perfect world... id like to have everitt and jeff white rotating in the ruck maybe gardiner in the reserves in case of injury

[penga]

Originally posted by swansrule100
are u saying doyle is better than ball?

in the centre - yes!