Davis out...who comes in?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • NMWBloods
    Taking Refuge!!
    • Jan 2003
    • 15819

    #31
    Or a free against.
    Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

    "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

    Comment

    • ROK Lobster
      RWO Life Member
      • Aug 2004
      • 8658

      #32
      Originally posted by NMWBloods
      Or a free against.
      That is why the ruckmen, and of course Big Bald Barry are at the bottom of the list...

      Comment

      • Schneidergirl
        On the Rookie List
        • Aug 2003
        • 468

        #33
        McVeigh.

        Comment

        • j0lly
          On the Rookie List
          • Jun 2004
          • 122

          #34
          isnt rowan warfe retiring at the end of the season??
          would be a pity not to give him a game in the seniors

          Comment

          • cruiser
            What the frack!
            • Jul 2004
            • 6114

            #35
            Originally posted by j0lly
            isnt rowan warfe retiring at the end of the season??
            would be a pity not to give him a game in the seniors
            Finals are not the time for pity and charity!
            Occupational hazards:
            I don't eat animals since discovering this ability. I used to. But one day the lamb I was eating came through to me and ever since then I haven't been able to eat meat.
            - animal psychic Amanda de Warren

            Comment

            • Damien
              Living in 2005
              • Jan 2003
              • 3713

              #36
              Originally posted by j0lly
              isnt rowan warfe retiring at the end of the season??
              would be a pity not to give him a game in the seniors
              Has Long Bay Jail turned you into a softy? lol

              I would sue Paul Roos and the Sydney Swans if Rowan was returned to the line up this week! haha

              Comment

              • Snowy
                On the Rookie List
                • Jun 2003
                • 1244

                #37
                clanger is defined as a blatant unforced error but to look at the clanger rates doesn't tell the full picture because they include all the frees against, not just given an accurate picture of ball usage. And sometimes they are generous with some players. You can watch a game and think a bloke has turned it over heaps only to see a couple of clangers registered while others who use it well are attributed with lots of them. And as someone said they don't take into account those who can deliver the ball with lower risk. People who just take it out of the centre and kick it to anyone don't have clangers registered as it is defined as being under some pressure yet often this kick does not favour the person's team.
                LIFE GOES ON

                Comment

                • Doctor
                  Bay 29
                  • Sep 2003
                  • 2757

                  #38
                  McVeigh was last out and should be first back in. He's done a good job this year and is a player of the future. Whoever gets picked will be spending quite a bit of time on the bench and I'd rather see a positive move like McVeigh to help him see the confidence the coach has in him. He'll also be able to give the midfielders a break if necessary.
                  Today's a draft of your epitaph

                  Comment

                  • SimonH
                    Salt future's rising
                    • Aug 2004
                    • 1647

                    #39
                    Best 22: Fosdike
                    Form: McVeigh
                    Big body to come off the bench if their forwards moider us in the first half: James

                    And I reckon it's a bloody disgrace that Warfie didn't get put on the bench for the Richmond game and get to have a farewell prance around the 'G for about 15 minutes in the final quarter. It's not so long ago teams used to play with 20 players- we could have made do with 21 agin' the bottom team!

                    Comment

                    • Matt79
                      Bring it on!
                      • Sep 2004
                      • 3143

                      #40
                      Originally posted by SimonH
                      Best 22: Fosdike
                      Form: McVeigh
                      Big body to come off the bench if their forwards moider us in the first half: James

                      And I reckon it's a bloody disgrace that Warfie didn't get put on the bench for the Richmond game and get to have a farewell prance around the 'G for about 15 minutes in the final quarter. It's not so long ago teams used to play with 20 players- we could have made do with 21 agin' the bottom team!
                      Simon, you cannot flirt with form going into the finals!! Even though we were playing the bottom side we were not guaranteed a spot in the finals and Richmond had a lot to play for! Hindsight can be a dangerous thing!
                      Swannies for life!

                      Comment

                      • SimonH
                        Salt future's rising
                        • Aug 2004
                        • 1647

                        #41
                        I agree. I was half-joking (only half because I remember that circa-2000 or thereabouts we did exactly that with Mark Bayes), but I don't believe in using smilies.

                        Comment

                        • barry
                          Veterans List
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 8499

                          #42
                          If Fosdike doesnt crack it for a finals game this year, I think we can safely assume he's gone for next year.

                          Saying that, I'd prefer McVeigh if we are going for a midfielder.

                          I like that we have three relatively strong reserves players pushing for selection if you include James. Means we can take a couple of injuries and still field quality sides in the next 3 games.

                          Comment

                          • punter257
                            Deadliest Left Boot
                            • Aug 2004
                            • 1660

                            #43
                            i would love to see mcveigh get a run on the G in a finals match. give the kid some big game experience, even though if he is selected he'll get limited game time. but he has shown glimpses of class this season and is not afraid to back himself in
                            Roosy = LEGEND

                            Comment

                            • Matt79
                              Bring it on!
                              • Sep 2004
                              • 3143

                              #44
                              I guess all will be revealed in a couple of hours! Will be a very interesting selection for the Swannies!

                              I agree that if Fos does not get picked he may well and truely be trade bait.
                              Swannies for life!

                              Comment

                              • liz
                                Veteran
                                Site Admin
                                • Jan 2003
                                • 16795

                                #45
                                Originally posted by barry
                                If Fosdike doesnt crack it for a finals game this year, I think we can safely assume he's gone for next year.

                                That's rubbish. Fosdike has been injured. He's had a series of injuries and each time he's been close to returning he's broken down with another.

                                Roos has quite clearly stated that Fosdike is in his "best" team but is not sure whether he's ready to resume fitness wise. In a cut-throat final you don't want to go in with a running player who may not last beyond quarter time.

                                All year we've been bemoaning Roos picking players who weren't quite over their injury or who hadn't regained match fitness. His approach to Fosdike is consistent with what we've been "demanding" - isn't that a good thing?

                                I don't think you can read a single thing into Fosdike's selection or non-selection this weekend other than an assessment of whether he's match fit.

                                Comment

                                Working...