Zantuck Well Worth a Look

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ihamilto
    On the Rookie List
    • May 2004
    • 331

    Zantuck Well Worth a Look

    I have just been doing some homework on Ty Zantuck to see if
    he might be of some use to us I was surprised to find that he is
    only 22 you would think his best years are still to come he was a
    rising star nomination in 2002 had an excellent 2003 he is a good
    build has a bit of fire can play forward or back he will miss the
    first round in 2005 due to suspension certainly he would be
    worth a late round draft pick or maybe even a straight swap for
    Mark Powell.
    cheers Ian
  • motorace_182
    On the Rookie List
    • Jan 2003
    • 961

    #2
    Is he open for trade??
    I havent watched many Tigers games over the last 2 years to be honest, but is it fair to say he is fairly soft and sits outside a ruck or scrimmage to gain a possession?? Or have i got him confused with another Tiger?
    - Impossible is just a big word thrown around by small men who find it easier to live in a world they've been given, than to explore the power they have to change it. Impossible is not a fact, it's an opinion. Impossible is not a declaration, it's a dare. Impossible is potential. Impossible is temporary. Impossible is nothing!

    Comment

    • robbieando
      The King
      • Jan 2003
      • 2750

      #3
      No room for him in our forward line as it is and in defence we have Barry, C. Bolton and Saddington who are better than him in the role he would play. Plus do we really want to get a defender from the team that won the wooden spoon????

      We can do better
      Once was, now elsewhere

      Comment

      • swansrule100
        The quarterback
        • May 2004
        • 4538

        #4
        powell would be a good swap... i doubt richmond would do that think they rate zantuck higher than the swans rate powell
        Theres not much left to say

        Comment

        • ihamilto
          On the Rookie List
          • May 2004
          • 331

          #5
          Originally posted by robbieando
          No room for him in our forward line as it is and in defence we have Barry, C. Bolton and Saddington who are better than him in the role he would play. Plus do we really want to get a defender from the team that won the wooden spoon????

          We can do better
          First put him in a good team and
          you may be surprised just how well he fits in he is physically
          stronger than Bolten and would do no worse than Saddington
          remember Andrew Schauble was not a star when he first arrived
          all he needed was a chance lets not be too hasty to judge as I
          said he is only 22. cheers Ian

          Comment

          • Matt79
            Bring it on!
            • Sep 2004
            • 3143

            #6
            Not worth looking at. He was reasonably ordinary in a very ordinary team.
            Swannies for life!

            Comment

            • NMWBloods
              Taking Refuge!!
              • Jan 2003
              • 15819

              #7
              I thought Zantuck looked alright as a medium sized defender with decent strength. Controlling his temper is a factor though. And I'm not sure if we need another player of his size - we really need a big KP defender if anything.
              Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

              "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

              Comment

              • Wil
                On the Rookie List
                • Jun 2004
                • 619

                #8
                Can he be a Great -> All Australian CHB/FB for the next 4-6 years? If not, we don't need him.

                Comment

                • penga
                  Senior Player
                  • Jan 2003
                  • 2601

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Wil
                  Can he be a Great -> All Australian CHB/FB for the next 4-6 years? If not, we don't need him.
                  no, he is too short, play james ahead of him
                  C'mon Chels!

                  Comment

                  • Barry Schneider
                    On the Rookie List
                    • Sep 2003
                    • 530

                    #10
                    Undersized defender forced to play on big forwards due to injuries.We already have Craig Bolton.We need a genuine key defender although I am still holding out hope for LRT to be that man long term.

                    Comment

                    • Wil
                      On the Rookie List
                      • Jun 2004
                      • 619

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Barry Schneider
                      Undersized defender forced to play on big forwards due to injuries.We already have Craig Bolton.We need a genuine key defender although I am still holding out hope for LRT to be that man long term.
                      There you go, exactly my point.

                      We do not need just a key defender, If we want to be a championship team, we need a great, consistant one.

                      Comment

                      • ihamilto
                        On the Rookie List
                        • May 2004
                        • 331

                        #12
                        Originally posted by penga
                        no, he is too short, play james ahead of him
                        Guys all Australian CHB and Fullbacks dont grow on trees all I am
                        saying is he might be handy and James has done nothing to
                        convince me he is the answer as a key defender.
                        cheers Ian

                        Comment

                        • Nico
                          Veterans List
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 11339

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Wil
                          There you go, exactly my point.

                          We do not need just a key defender, If we want to be a championship team, we need a great, consistant one.
                          What the odds of finding 2 needles in a haystack?

                          A great consistent defender and a great, brilliant consistent midfielder. There are a lot of recruiting managers scrambling through that same haystack right now.
                          http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

                          Comment

                          • Nico
                            Veterans List
                            • Jan 2003
                            • 11339

                            #14
                            As undisciplined and mediocre Zantuck might be has he really had the chances. Early in his career he looked like he the "Ottens" (potential) but seems to have inherited the ratty genes of his old man, who could play when he wanted.

                            Has the build, has speed, is fairly strong overhead for his size, and has a go, so could be moulded into something worthwhile.

                            Maybe we should cut him some slack given his whole career has been under the tutorlage of Danny Frawley. If he could be taught to play footy he may be a useful contributor.
                            http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

                            Comment

                            • Wil
                              On the Rookie List
                              • Jun 2004
                              • 619

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Nico
                              What the odds of finding 2 needles in a haystack?

                              A great consistent defender and a great, brilliant consistent midfielder. There are a lot of recruiting managers scrambling through that same haystack right now.
                              Of course, it is not easy. Thats why it the Swans have not won a championship since 1933.

                              We can not accept mediocre players or just "top 22" type players to get us to the next stage. We essentially need at least two more, real, all-australian types. Either recruited by draft (preferrable) or trade. And they need to be good for another 4 years or more. Not only that, we have to be careful not to ruin our future in doing so. It is hard, hard, hard. And I am glad its not me doing it.

                              Comment

                              Working...