-
-
That sounds like a satisfactory trade, Fosdike for Jolly. -
Sydney, chasing Melbourne ruckman Darren Jolly, has offered midfielder Nic Fosdike to Adelaide for pick 24, Adelaide's second-round selection, which it hopes to offer to the Demons.
Sydney's proposal is acknowledgement that it is unlikely to acquire Ottens, whom the club pursued despite his desire to play for Geelong.You don't ban those who supported your opponent, you make them wallow in their loserdom by covering your victory! You sit them in the front row. You give them a hat! Toby ZieglerComment
-
Jolly could be good value.
Simmonds is probably a better get than Ottens, would think he has performed better at the top level.
Worth having another crack at him (If he would come to Sydney)You don't ban those who supported your opponent, you make them wallow in their loserdom by covering your victory! You sit them in the front row. You give them a hat! Toby ZieglerComment
-
Simmonds will be staying at fremantle, they have just offered him a 4 year contract.Originally posted by Reggi
Jolly could be good value.
Simmonds is probably a better get than Ottens, would think he has performed better at the top level.
Worth having another crack at him (If he would come to Sydney)Comment
-
I take that back, he has rejected the new 4 year deal.Originally posted by Syd Swan
Simmonds will be staying at fremantle, they have just offered him a 4 year contract.Comment
-
$300,000 a season for Fosdike is a joke. He has never proved himself to be at that level!- Impossible is just a big word thrown around by small men who find it easier to live in a world they've been given, than to explore the power they have to change it. Impossible is not a fact, it's an opinion. Impossible is not a declaration, it's a dare. Impossible is potential. Impossible is temporary. Impossible is nothing!Comment
-
Maybe they added a "0" by accident!!!!Originally posted by motorace_182
$300,000 a season for Fosdike is a joke. He has never proved himself to be at that level!
Comment
-
That's exactly what I was thinking. It's bull****.Originally posted by motorace_182
$300,000 a season for Fosdike is a joke. He has never proved himself to be at that level!"It's the best thing ever" (Andrew Ryan, 2004)Comment
-
Sydney could offer to pay part of the contract a la Blues Whitnall's, in order to get the deal done, given the space in the cap.LIFE GOES ONComment
-
I almost choked on my coffee when i read this.Originally posted by motorace_182
$300,000 a season for Fosdike is a joke. He has never proved himself to be at that level!
Good news that we are getting rod of Fosdike. Pity we haven't been able to score a much needed midfielder.Comment
-
Whoa. the world has gone crazy. 300k for fosdike 250 a year for krakouerOriginally posted by Reggi
Richmond has re-signed forward Andrew Krakouer for three seasons in a deal believed to be worth almost $750,000.
[
I wish my weed was EMO so it would cut itselfComment
-
I think he's going into the PSD, so Richmond will get him for nothing.Originally posted by Syd Swan
I take that back, he has rejected the new 4 year deal.Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.
"[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."Comment
-
I refuse to believe that Fosdike is on $300,000 a year. That would put him ahead of Jude, Davis, Ball and probably Kirk!!
If we can get Jolly for Fosdike, I'd be happy with that and happy to let Ottens go.We hate Anthony Rocca
We hate Shannon Grant too
We hate scumbag Gaspar
But Leo WE LOVE YOU!Comment
-
hahahaha, he won't be traded if he's on that.Swans coach Paul Roos said Fosdike was happy to return to his native South Australia. However, while the 24-year-old has been mentioned freely in trade talk, some clubs are understood to have baulked at the size of his contract, believed to be worth more than $300,000 a season
And the Swans should either ask him to AT LEAST 1/2 his contract or delist him.
I don't believe it.
Like the way that reads.The battle for Richmond ruckman Brad Ottens seems likely to become a game of brinkmanship before tomorrow's 2pm trading deadline. The Swans remain ready to pounce if Geelong are unable to clinch a deal for Ottens.
The Swans have decided what they are willing to give for Ottens, and are sticking to it.
If it comes off, I dare say we will have struck a reasonable deal for him.
If it doesn't, you'd have to say that the Swans have been prudent.
Also good to hear.Roos denied the Swans had shown interest in Collingwood midfielder Shane O'Bree despite reports to the contrary. He said O'Bree's name had been mentioned by the Magpies but that he did not fit into his plans.The difference between insanity and genius is measured only in success.Comment
- If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
- RWO Forum Rules (PLEASE READ FIRST)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your posts may be deleted, without warning or notification at moderator discretion, for breach of any of the RWO rules set out below. If you have any questions or concerns about post/thread removal, please feel free to PM a moderator or Email us at [email protected]
Do not post your queries on the main boards. Such posts WILL be removed, without further explanation.
Constant breaches of the rules will result in your access to RWO being reduced as the Moderator / Administrator group see fit. RWO uses the vBulletin Infraction System to deal with breaches of the RWO rules. All Infractions have an expiry date. Such an expiry date may be as short as 10 days or as long as 6 months. Multiple infractions, depending on the number of points a member accumulates, WILL result in temporary bans from the site and CAN result in a permanent ban. Please note that some Infractions have an expiry date of "Never" and WILL result in the RWO member being banned from the site immediately.
1) Signatures / Avatars
Keep signatures under 4 lines of standard sized fonts (if you must use large fonts, use just one line) as a courtesy to all users who read the forums.
Do not use signatures / avatars as an opportunity to make jibes at other forum members. This will be considered to be sniping (refer Rule 6 below). You may not refer to another RWO forum member, or quote anything they have written, without permission from that member. Using an anonymous tag does not make it acceptable. If quotes are not removed, we reserve the right to remove them, without notification. If in doubt as to whether something is acceptable or not, don't use it!
2) Spamming
Advertising for personal commercial purposes is NOT permitted. Placing links to sites that other users may find of interest / personal websites is acceptable within reason (ie constantly posting links will be frowned upon).
3) Deliberately avoiding the RWO swear filter
RWO is a site that is accessible by Swans supporters of all ages and walks of life. A swear filter is in place to mask offensive words and phrases. This swear filter contains offensive words and variant spellings of offensive words to stop you from deliberately avoiding the swear filter. Do not attempt to avoid the swear filter through alternate spelling of offensive words. Do not attempt to avoid the swear filter by devising systems to fool the swear filter in its recognition of offensive words.
4) Inappropriate Language / Excessive swearing
RWO is a site that is accessible by Swans supporters of all ages and walks of life. Moderators will let some minor cases through. Anything deemed to be of poor taste or of an offensive nature may be removed at moderator discretion. Consider all members when posting; what you think is funny, not all members will feel the same way.
5) Trolling / Baiting
Deliberately posting on threads in an attempt to stir / bait other RWO users will not be tolerated.
6) Flaming / Sniping / Abuse / Insulting other members
If you have to have a go at someone personally, take it off the boards. Everyone else doesn't need to see your hissy fits. Remember, "Play the ball, not the man". This includes spouses or partners. If you don''t like a post, don't flame, snipe, abuse or insult in response - it makes the job of moderation much harder. Report the post through the forum reporting mechanism (click on the Triangle with the exclamation mark) and let the Moderator / Administrator group deal with it.
7) Legal issuesa) The Moderator / Administrator group will keep a very close eye on threads discussing rumours or anything that could be potentially libellous. Moderators and Administrators are not interested in the chance of legal action regardless of how small - if deemed that there is ANY threat to RWO potentially, we will come down hard on it.
b) Due to potential issues of copyright infringement and the potential legal implications, posting of complete articles is NOT permitted. If necessary, post a link to the article. Where appropriate, you may quote sections of the article to aid in discussion.
c) Due to potential issues of copyright infringement and potential legal implications, posting of links to "live streaming (of AFL games)" and "AFL content" sites that are not AFL endorsed is NOT permitted. Posts with such links will be removed immediately and infraction points will be issued.
d) Freedom of speech does NOT = freedom to slander
8) Racial / Sexual Discrimination / Villification
It is not acceptable for members to engage in racial and/or sexual discrimination / villification. It is not acceptable for members to use terminology in describing race or gender in a derogatory manner. Discussing and disputing the views and opinions of other posters is acceptable. Personally vilifying or abusing others for having certain characteristics, or being a member of a certain group (or because you think they're a member of a certain group), is not. This rule shall apply to any post attacking race, skin colour, ethnic background, gender and sexuality.
See also: ---> RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ACT 1975 - SECT 9
See also: ---> RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ACT 1975 - SECT 18C
9) Prohibited
Anything deemed to be of Adult content or porn related nature will be removed immediately. Selling or offering of drugs, drug references, other than those openly discussed and identified in the press, will also be removed immediately. Breaches of this rule carry the highest infraction points and may result in permanent bans on a first offence.
10) Off-topic Posts
Some members prefer to just read Swans or footy related posts. This is, after all, a SSFC website. Ensure you post threads in the appropriate forum, or they will be moved. While threads will sometimes move away from the original topic, do not deliberately drag a thread away from its original subject.
11) Attachments
Attachments within the size limit prescribed are permitted. However, due to costs associated with uploads/downloads, if you wish to attach a number of files within a thread, or feel that the quality of the attachment is compromised by the file size restrictions, you may wish to use external hosting providers and link to the files there.
12) Moderator / Administrator Group
The Moderator / Administrator group reserve the right to delete or move threads / posts as well as remove signatures / avatars as necessary according to the rules of the RWO forum.
13) Final decisions
Any decisions made around the intepretation of the rules above are entirely at the discretion of the site administrators. Such decisions are final.
14) Vistitors from other sites
You are most welcome to join in discussions on RWO, but remember, you are a GUEST on our site. Abide by the RWO Forum Rules or we WILL ban you.
15) Guidelines regarding Visitors to RWO for RWO members.
Be nice, not all visitors are trolls.a) If they annoy you, ignore them. They want a reaction. Don't give them one.
b) If they are abusive, report them. We will consider banning them. Don't stoop to their level.Bottom line
You are a guest on RWO - You are expected to play by the rules of the house.
Last Update: ScottH, June 22nd, 2008 (Included Spouses/partners in Rule 6)
Last Update: Frog, August 16th, 2010 (Added rule 7c)
Last update: ScottH July 17th, 2011 (Added Rule 7d)
Tweet
© RedAndWhiteOnline.com 2003-
Powered by vBulletin® Version 6.0.6
Copyright © 2025 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2025 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
All times are GMT+10. This page was generated at 03:56 AM.
Comment