Team now

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ROK Lobster
    RWO Life Member
    • Aug 2004
    • 8658

    #16
    Originally posted by Newbie
    Jolly to take the first ruck. Doyle on the bench as the alternate ruckman. Ball in the cotton wool for about 5 weeks after which the ruck duo are whoever standing.

    Would hate to see Ball to be relied on as first ruck. He is getting on. I doubt the poor man would last half of the season playing first ruck.
    I'm guessing we might see a bit of Ball at Full Back and Schauble at CHB. Just guessing though...

    Comment

    • sharp9
      Senior Player
      • Jan 2003
      • 2508

      #17
      Bleed Red Blood you sure are sitting on the fence by naming several players in one position.

      This is my 22 for Round 1 (assuming all fit and firing)

      Back: Crouch Schauble Bevan

      HBack: C. Bolton LRT Barry

      Cen: Goodes Williams Kennelly

      HFor: Davis Hall O'Keefe

      For: O'Loughlin Saddington Schneider

      Ruck: Ball Kirk Buchanan

      Bench: Doyle, J. Bolton, Mathews, Maxfield

      I've left out Jolly (for Doyle/Ball in the ruck and Saddington in the Forward Line)

      I've chosen Saddington ahead of Nicks in the forward line because he is a genuine tall.

      I've chosen LRT ahead of James as CHB for a similar reason...call me a traditionalist. It's possible that M. Davis could be eyeing that spot too, I mean if Rivers can do it.... Here's hoping, anyway.

      Kirk, Williams and Buchanan are head and shoulders the best three midfielders at the moment and, IMO, MUST play on the ball. When it cames to extraction AND delivery they are far and away ahead of Mathews, J. Bolton, McVeigh, Maxfield, Ablett and Fosdike.

      So, that being the case, the rest of the team builds from there.

      Goodes and Kennelly should be played in the centre for pace and creativity. Tiger can defend his patch too, of course after 3 years in the back-line!

      The thing that may look odd is that I have Bevan starting while J. Bolton, Mathews and Maxfield are on the bench. Well, that's the way I rate them, quite frankly. With Tiger and Goodesy in the midfield, along with Willo and Monty, then I say leave Bevan down back to do his job, and I would rather see him doing it than Mathews.

      I would rather see Monty, Captain and Tiger with the ball in hand than Maxi, Benny or Jude so there you have it. Those three start on the bench.

      Their experience still sees them ahead of young McVeigh and Ablett for the 22.

      The list of those on the fringes is pretty long, though

      In order......McVeigh, Fixter, Nicks, Ablett, Jolly, James and Fosdike. Pretty handy names not to be getting a game.

      Then there's Sunny, Powell and Thewlis who have had a taste,

      Then Dempster and Malceski, who are at emergency level,

      And finally the "kids" in M. Davis, Willoughby, Schmidt and Erikson.

      Looking at that list you would have to think that whichever two are delisted on Friday they would be pretty good money to be redrafted.

      Pretty hard to punt on pick 32 or whatever it is when ALL of those above have at least been rated at some point.

      Then again we could pick up a Simon Black for a Mark Powell!
      "I'll acknowledge there are more talented teams in the competition but I won't acknowledge that there is a better team in the competition" Paul Roos March 2005

      Comment

      • NMWBloods
        Taking Refuge!!
        • Jan 2003
        • 15819

        #18
        Originally posted by chammond
        I think the Swans would have too much egg on their faces if Jolly was "omitted" in Round 1.

        But I certainly agree that he may well have to 'prove' himself against Doyle throughout the year if there are no injuries.
        What he said!
        Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

        "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

        Comment

        • Captain
          Captain of the Side
          • Feb 2004
          • 3602

          #19
          Originally posted by ROK Lobster
          I'm guessing we might see a bit of Ball at Full Back and Schauble at CHB. Just guessing though...
          Ball will only ever play full back when the opposition has a ruckman that can be a damaging forward, such as Everitt.

          Other than that, Ball will never ever play full back. He will alternate between rucking, full forward and the bench.

          Comment

          • penga
            Senior Player
            • Jan 2003
            • 2601

            #20
            Originally posted by sharp9
            This is my 22 for Round 1 (assuming all fit and firing)
            same, except maybe james at CHB, he is taller than m. davis, FWIW and leppitsch also
            Last edited by penga; 26 October 2004, 11:47 AM.
            C'mon Chels!

            Comment

            • sharp9
              Senior Player
              • Jan 2003
              • 2508

              #21
              Originally posted by penga
              same, except maybe james at CHB, he is taller than m. davis, FWIW and leppitsch also
              Thank you



              Official site says Davis 191 (78 kg), James 191 (90 kg) and Powell 190 (88 kg), although RWO says Davis 190 (78 kg) and James 189 (87 kg) Powell 193 (83 kg)

              I guess some days they remember to stand up straight, or, hopefully, young Davis and Powell are still growing.

              By way of comparison

              Rivers 191 (85 kg)
              Leppitsch 191 (97 kg)
              Michael 190 (99 kg)
              Scarlett 191 (92 kg)
              Cornes 191 (91 kg)
              Clement 190 (95 kg)
              Wakelin 191 (94 kg)

              Anyone seeing a pattern here amongst CHBs???
              "I'll acknowledge there are more talented teams in the competition but I won't acknowledge that there is a better team in the competition" Paul Roos March 2005

              Comment

              • penga
                Senior Player
                • Jan 2003
                • 2601

                #22
                Originally posted by sharp9
                Thank you
                i dont know why u r saying that... ive posted a very, very similar best 22 a number of times on this site, it just means we agree
                C'mon Chels!

                Comment

                • dendol
                  fat-arsed midfielder
                  • Oct 2003
                  • 1483

                  #23
                  Originally posted by sharp9
                  Anyone seeing a pattern here amongst CHBs???
                  James is going to be a champion backman based on his height and weight? Or Davis is never going to be a champion backman unless he puts on about 15kg.

                  Comment

                  • liz
                    Veteran
                    Site Admin
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 16739

                    #24
                    Originally posted by dendol
                    James is going to be a champion backman based on his height and weight? Or Davis is never going to be a champion backman unless he puts on about 15kg.
                    I don't see Davis as a KPP. He is more in the Kennelly mould, I suspect.

                    Comment

                    • chammond
                      • Jan 2003
                      • 1368

                      #25
                      M Davis is still very young . . . . I'd be amazed if he gets a senior game in 2005.

                      And I don't reckon we'll see his real potential for at least another two or three seasons.

                      Comment

                      • Schneiderman
                        The Fourth Captain
                        • Aug 2004
                        • 1615

                        #26
                        Originally posted by chammond
                        And I don't reckon we'll see his real potential for at least another two or three seasons.
                        But what potential!!
                        Our Greatest Moment:

                        Saturday, 24th Sept, 2005 - 5:13pm

                        Comment

                        • sharp9
                          Senior Player
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 2508

                          #27
                          Originally posted by dendol
                          James is going to be a champion backman based on his height and weight? Or Davis is never going to be a champion backman unless he puts on about 15kg.
                          Well, now you're being silly.

                          I thought it worth noting that nearly all of the AFLs premier CHB (or mobile big men) are 191 and mid 90s.

                          Just makes me think that our three are at least on the right track as far as size goes for the position. I've always kind of assumed that they were too small (esp James height wise).
                          "I'll acknowledge there are more talented teams in the competition but I won't acknowledge that there is a better team in the competition" Paul Roos March 2005

                          Comment

                          • Newbie
                            On the Rookie List
                            • Mar 2003
                            • 720

                            #28
                            James is noway near 190cm. He is about 188cm. He does seem taller with his marking ability. Being a bit undersize, he does require a good leap to play. This might be something missing in his arsenals given the numerous injuries he got.

                            Comment

                            • Nico
                              Veterans List
                              • Jan 2003
                              • 11329

                              #29
                              I suggest Bevan will be moved into the midfield. Was tried a couple of times for periods during games eg. Carlton Optus Oval with some success. Played some good one on one games in defence but would rather see his gung ho style used on the ball.
                              http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

                              Comment

                              • penga
                                Senior Player
                                • Jan 2003
                                • 2601

                                #30
                                Originally posted by Newbie
                                James is noway near 190cm. He is about 188cm.
                                i disagree, when talking to him, ive always been surprised at how tall he is. around the 191 mark as the current swans site suggests.
                                C'mon Chels!

                                Comment

                                Working...