I really hope Roos has got another game plan tucked up his sleeve.

[ScottH]

Originally posted by NMWBloods
The new holding the ball rule is a shocker.

Agreed

Originally posted by NMWBloods
Don't mind some of the other rules for the Wiz Cup:

• Super goals

Well the Swans players didn't like that rule either!!!!

Originally posted by NMWBloods
Don't mind some of the other rules for the Wiz Cup:

• Kickins immediately after behind

ROK almost enjoyed that rule, until they took the ball off him, and made them kick it in again.

[Whitefox]

Originally posted by NMWBloods
Whatever you reckon...

How on earth would they be an "embarrassment"...

Come now Bloods - real fans don't like super goals.

[cruiser]

Originally posted by ROK Lobster
I'd like to see the introduction of 'super behinds'. And before cruiser gives us a list of who already has them

LO very L!

[Ajn]

Originally posted by LittleSchneider
*I would love the new supergoal rule even more if Schneids had not kicked the bloody post!!!*

What the heck was he trying to do, bounce it through????
Good idea if it is wet, but with an ability to kick 60 m, why not try to not be so cute. Roos called him a smart player, in referring to the holding the ball rule, pitty those smarts didn't travel to his head.

The guy could be a big impact player if he doesn't try to overate himself and work hard on his game to get to that ranking. Same goes to N Davis (at whichever Maccas store he is currently at)

[Whitefox]

Originally posted by Ajn
Same goes to N Davis (at whichever Maccas store he is currently at)

Nick doesn't like McDonalds - can't be bothered lifting the bun to take the pickles off.

But thank you - that's the first time i've heard the word "heck" for years.

[Beaussie]

Originally posted by Ajn
Same goes to N Davis (at whichever Maccas store he is currently at)

I always thought our Nick preferred KFC.

[floppinab]

Originally posted by Ajn
What the heck was he trying to do, bounce it through????

Looking at it I'm pretty sure he miskicked it and was actually trying to put a lot more on it.

[LittleSchneider]

Originally posted by floppinab
Looking at it I'm pretty sure he miskicked it and was actually trying to put a lot more on it.

Took the words right out of my mouth. Looks like he didnt plant his right foot properly.

[Nico]

The rule they should introduce is a free kick for kicking backwards after the 20 minuite mark of every quarter. Bugger this no mark bizzo. Currently kicking backwards is a blight on the game, and takes away the chance of an exciting finish. I would love to know how many sides shut shop in time on last season.

[phantom]

Rule I would like to see is no hand contact with opponent in marking contests.
The current rules/interpretation reward the guy second in line.

Whatever happened to the emphasis on front possie?

Besides, if you couldn't just push your way to the footy we might see the return of a few high marks - remember them?

The good old fashioned screamer tended to happen when it was the only way to overcome the guy with the front spot.

[NMWBloods]

Far less screamers because there is far less kicking to a contest. It's all about control now - makes it far less exciting to watch.

[Schneiderman]

Re: I really hope Roos has got another game plan tucked up his sleeve.

Originally posted by footyhead
May not be such a bad thing actually might wake a few people up.

Why would you expect that?? The Swans have made the last two finals series AND won at least one final in each and you still haven't woken up to just how good the team and coach are

[swansrule100]

Re: Re: I really hope Roos has got another game plan tucked up his sleeve.

Originally posted by Schneiderman
Why would you expect that?? The Swans have made the last two finals series AND won at least one final in each and you still haven't woken up to just how good the team and coach are

a lot of people dont see it!