Sawers gets jump on rules ruckus

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ScottH
    It's Goodes to cheer!!
    • Sep 2003
    • 23665

    Sawers gets jump on rules ruckus

    Sawers gets jump on rules ruckus


    AFL umpires coach Rowan Sawers admitted to the Sydney Swans that on a number of occasions the umpires didn't get it right last weekend.
  • peterh_oz
    On the Rookie List
    • Jan 2003
    • 302

    #2
    He was talking about the rucks only tho.

    And the non-taking-eyes-off-ball - there's nothing new about that. It has always been that if you looked at your opponent then your "primary objective" is not the ball therefore you would be pinged for shepherding in the contest when you jump in front of the opponent.
    COMPARE YOUR BROADBAND PLAN AND SAVE - - $15 Connection CashBack OR Free Delivery
    ADSL - ADSL2 - NAKED ADSL - Business ADSL/SHDSL - 3G/HSPA - VoIP - 3c FAX VIA EMAIL
    Mobiles / Cap Plans & 3G Mobile / Broadband plans - 5c SMS - VoIP on your Mobile

    Comment

    • sharp9
      Senior Player
      • Jan 2003
      • 2508

      #3
      That really surprised me (pleasantly) as it seemed that Jolly eas the one not watching the ball. but I gues iit could be that Darcy was charging in first meaning Jolly was taking his eyes away for his own safety. And it might explain Doyle not winning many hit-outs when he usually does. Let's hope so.
      "I'll acknowledge there are more talented teams in the competition but I won't acknowledge that there is a better team in the competition" Paul Roos March 2005

      Comment

      • liz
        Veteran
        Site Admin
        • Jan 2003
        • 16744

        #4
        Watching the Saints Dogs game last night you could see that Darcy was changing his centre bounce technique throughout the game, trying a few different approachs. On at least one occasion he started parallel to the line and seemed to have slightly crossed over it by the time that the ball was there to be contested. He managed to get his body between his opponent and the ball, much as players try to do at around-the-ground bounce-ups, and thus got a fairly easy tap.

        He didn't get pulled up for it so I presume it is allowed, but it seems to represent a completely different type of contest to that we've traditionally seen at centre bounces.

        It's also interesting some of the comments that have been made about the effect the rule will have. Everitt has suggested that it will make ruckmen obsolete and that teams might just as well have another midfielder in there. Roos, on the otherhand, has suggested that it will aid the really tall rucks, handing the likes of Sandilands tap-outs. And someone else (can't remember who - its another current ruckman) suggests that the brawn will be taken out of a ruckman's game but that they will have to become much smarter players.

        Comment

        • chammond
          • Jan 2003
          • 1368

          #5
          Originally posted by liz
          Watching the Saints Dogs game last night you could see that Darcy was changing his centre bounce technique throughout the game, trying a few different approachs. On at least one occasion he started parallel to the line and seemed to have slightly crossed over it by the time that the ball was there to be contested. He managed to get his body between his opponent and the ball, much as players try to do at around-the-ground bounce-ups, and thus got a fairly easy tap.
          Yeah, I noticed that same thing when we played the Doggies . . . it was quite fascinating to watch the mind games in the centre bounces . . . obviously the Eade influence.

          Although I thought that Jolly did pretty well against a ruckman who many rate as the best in the comp, he suffered because he rarely took the initiative and mostly just 'reacted' to Darcy's movements.

          Comment

          • Bayes30
            On the Rookie List
            • Dec 2003
            • 39

            #6
            Originally posted by liz
            And someone else (can't remember who - its another current ruckman) suggests that the brawn will be taken out of a ruckman's game but that they will have to become much smarter players.
            So far, I've only seen those sorts of words from Brendan Gale of the AFLPA (Ex-Richmond) and Sam Newman.

            It sounds good, in theory . . .

            Comment

            Working...