If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
And the non-taking-eyes-off-ball - there's nothing new about that. It has always been that if you looked at your opponent then your "primary objective" is not the ball therefore you would be pinged for shepherding in the contest when you jump in front of the opponent.
COMPARE YOUR BROADBAND PLAN AND SAVE - - $15 Connection CashBack OR Free Delivery
ADSL - ADSL2 - NAKED ADSL - Business ADSL/SHDSL - 3G/HSPA - VoIP - 3c FAX VIA EMAIL
Mobiles / Cap Plans & 3G Mobile / Broadband plans - 5c SMS - VoIP on your Mobile
That really surprised me (pleasantly) as it seemed that Jolly eas the one not watching the ball. but I gues iit could be that Darcy was charging in first meaning Jolly was taking his eyes away for his own safety. And it might explain Doyle not winning many hit-outs when he usually does. Let's hope so.
"I'll acknowledge there are more talented teams in the competition but I won't acknowledge that there is a better team in the competition" Paul Roos March 2005
Watching the Saints Dogs game last night you could see that Darcy was changing his centre bounce technique throughout the game, trying a few different approachs. On at least one occasion he started parallel to the line and seemed to have slightly crossed over it by the time that the ball was there to be contested. He managed to get his body between his opponent and the ball, much as players try to do at around-the-ground bounce-ups, and thus got a fairly easy tap.
He didn't get pulled up for it so I presume it is allowed, but it seems to represent a completely different type of contest to that we've traditionally seen at centre bounces.
It's also interesting some of the comments that have been made about the effect the rule will have. Everitt has suggested that it will make ruckmen obsolete and that teams might just as well have another midfielder in there. Roos, on the otherhand, has suggested that it will aid the really tall rucks, handing the likes of Sandilands tap-outs. And someone else (can't remember who - its another current ruckman) suggests that the brawn will be taken out of a ruckman's game but that they will have to become much smarter players.
Originally posted by liz Watching the Saints Dogs game last night you could see that Darcy was changing his centre bounce technique throughout the game, trying a few different approachs. On at least one occasion he started parallel to the line and seemed to have slightly crossed over it by the time that the ball was there to be contested. He managed to get his body between his opponent and the ball, much as players try to do at around-the-ground bounce-ups, and thus got a fairly easy tap.
Yeah, I noticed that same thing when we played the Doggies . . . it was quite fascinating to watch the mind games in the centre bounces . . . obviously the Eade influence.
Although I thought that Jolly did pretty well against a ruckman who many rate as the best in the comp, he suffered because he rarely took the initiative and mostly just 'reacted' to Darcy's movements.
Originally posted by liz And someone else (can't remember who - its another current ruckman) suggests that the brawn will be taken out of a ruckman's game but that they will have to become much smarter players.
So far, I've only seen those sorts of words from Brendan Gale of the AFLPA (Ex-Richmond) and Sam Newman.
Comment