Reserves Result

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BAM_BAM
    Support Staff
    • Jun 2003
    • 1820

    Reserves Result

    Hey guys,

    didn't take notes as I was too busy catching up during our first game back

    the score was

    Swans 23 - 16- 154
    Ainslie 3-2-20

    We basically ran all over them the team played well communicated well and just seemed to gell.

    A reliable sorce advised that Saddo played extremely well during the first half, mainly in the midfield.

    Quarter by Quarter

    1
    Swans 6-5-41
    Ainslie 0-1-1
    Q2
    Swans 15-7-97
    Ainslie 1-1-7
    Q3
    Swans 19-11-125
    Ainslie 3-1-19
    Q4
    Swans 23-16-154
    Ainslie 3-2-20

    Golas for the Swans to

    4 Campbell and Vogels
    3 Powell
    2 Spriggs, Moore, Garrubba
    1 Schmidt, Fosdike, Grundy, Malceski

    I'm 2 short on the goals, this list was via the scoreboard at match end, so there may have been some singles not listed.
    Here's my heart and you can break it
    I need some release, release, release
    We need
    Love and peace
  • footyhead
    Banned indefinitely by Moderators for posting totally inappropriate material
    • May 2003
    • 1367

    #2
    can't be good for the canberra league having such disparity of talent between such teams.

    Comment

    • Nico
      Veterans List
      • Jan 2003
      • 11339

      #3
      Haven't played the good sides yet.
      http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

      Comment

      • liz
        Veteran
        Site Admin
        • Jan 2003
        • 16778

        #4
        Originally posted by footyhead
        can't be good for the canberra league having such disparity of talent between such teams.
        There is a wide disparity but last season the Swans weren't at the top. They were in a group of two or three teams clearly worse than the best two, though it varied depending on how many top up players were used.

        Queanbeyan and, I think, Belconnen were the top two, with Ainslee in the next group with the Swans.

        You would like to think, though, with the likes of Saddington, Ablett, Spriggs and Fosdike running around, we should have been far too good for anyone else. No doubt we will come back to the pack a bit as senior-level injuries take their toll.

        Comment

        • ROK Lobster
          RWO Life Member
          • Aug 2004
          • 8658

          #5
          Originally posted by liz

          Queanbeyan and, I think, Belconnen were the top two, with Ainslee in the next group with the Swans.
          Yep, Belconnen have won it 4 (or maybe only 3) years in a row.

          Comment

          • ItsAllGoodes
            Regular in the Side
            • Dec 2003
            • 675

            #6
            Hopefully the site below will have some useful info about the reserves this year. It has the fixture, and should provide results, ladder and stats. There isnt anything about the pre-season comp.

            The season proper starts next week (for us) with a match against Ainslie as a prelim to the game against the Kangaroos

            I am having trouble getting the complete link to work but if you go to:

            www.sportingpulse.com.au (and registering as a member, which is free)

            Click on Australian Rules
            Click on ACT
            Click on AFL Canberra
            Click on Fixture/Results
            Click on AFL Canberra Seniors (either under Saturday or Sunday)

            From there you can click on fixture/results/ladder or competition stats

            Fingers crossed it gives us an idea of how the younger players and those returning from injury are going
            Red and white till I die

            Comment

            • Old Royboy
              Support Staff
              • Mar 2004
              • 879

              #7
              The opposition in the was pretty non-existent, which can make it difficult to judge how blokes are going. With the likes of Spriggs, Fosdike, Saddington, Schmidt and Willloughby in the midfield, I haven?t seen such a strong reserves team for a long time, and that has to be good.

              The first impression looking at the twos this year is that there are very few skinny kids these days. The second year players have bulked up a bit and all the new boys have a higher degree of physical development than in the past.

              It seems that the reserves are being encouraged to play the ?run and gun? style. A few times one or other of the midfielders were caught HTB trying to do too much, but as the scoreboard showed they were generally successful.

              Saddo looked confident, his judgement of the ball in the air was spot on, ran and marked well. He?ll be back pretty soon.

              Spriggs and Fosdike had picnics. Spriggs displayed the usual quota of mongrel kicks, but unlike others I don?t think he is a lost cause. Given time to steady he gave some decent delivery and kicked two nice long goals. I have the feeling that accurate delivery when on the hard run is where he needs to work.

              Eriksson has finally put on some bulk, and created a couple of goals from his good tapwork. Most encouraging.

              Tim Schmidt is starting to impress. He is one midfielder who can hit a target lace out from 45m and did so several times yesterday.

              Nick Potter was very busy, always at the bottom of the packs. His was one of the goals the scoreboard missed, a terrific snap under heavy pressure. Paul Bevan clone in gamestyle.

              Nick Malceski is another looking good, confidence right back and marked well. Kicking for goal very ordinary though.

              Dempster was impressive in the backline, but because of the midfield dominance he spent most of the game working on his suntan.

              Mark Powell continues to frustrate. Reads the ball in the air well, but then drops the easy mark. I see this nearly every time he plays. Well down in the pecking order now.

              Jarred Moore flashed in and out, but what he did was clean and well executed in the main. Ed Clarke seems to have gone backwards since North Sydney, didn?t get a lot of gametime.
              Pay peanuts get monkeys

              Comment

              • Scottee
                Senior Player
                • Aug 2003
                • 1585

                #8
                Just wondering about the impression that Dempster is creating for anyone who has been watching him. Is he a possibility for CHB? He appears to be the type of player that can play a little bit taller than he actually is. Is this the right impression or is he just too small and better suited to the HBF or wing?

                Also wondering about the impression of Campbell and Vogels as potential CHBs as well. Are they a chance? Otherwise I can see us going back to Saddo as CHB if LRT doesn't settle down.

                I was also wondering who the choice is to be for the "nominated rookie" at this stage.

                Any comments much appreciated.
                We have them where we want them, everything is going according to plan!

                Comment

                • Old Royboy
                  Support Staff
                  • Mar 2004
                  • 879

                  #9
                  Dempster is only about ROK size, but plays tall because he is a clean ?one grabber?. His running out of defence has been a feature this year, he?s a long kick of the footy and can kick goals. Too small to handle a J Brown type CHF, I guess this is why some have suggested HBF to release Kennelly onto the wing. If he holds form and avoids injury he will debut this year at some stage.

                  Vogels and Campbell both played forward this week. Vogels is the more impressive of the two right now. As Liz pointed out pre-season, if there is a nomination it will depend on need as much as which of the rookies is playing the best. ATM I think that Vogels and Potter are going better than the other rookies.
                  Pay peanuts get monkeys

                  Comment

                  • graemed
                    Swans2win
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 410

                    #10
                    The player list in the record did not have a name for No. 49. A Vogel clone playing on HB line.

                    Any ideas looked handy.

                    Comment

                    • Old Royboy
                      Support Staff
                      • Mar 2004
                      • 879

                      #11
                      Ryan Quade, supp list player. Previously played for Queenbeyan.
                      Fair size unit for 20, listed at 195cm and 95kg.
                      Pay peanuts get monkeys

                      Comment

                      • liz
                        Veteran
                        Site Admin
                        • Jan 2003
                        • 16778

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Old Royboy
                        Dempster is only about ROK size, but plays tall because he is a clean ?one grabber?. His running out of defence has been a feature this year, he?s a long kick of the footy and can kick goals. Too small to handle a J Brown type CHF, I guess this is why some have suggested HBF to release Kennelly onto the wing. If he holds form and avoids injury he will debut this year at some stage.

                        He's listed at 192cm (and ROK has officially shrunk to 187cm per the Swans site but is still listed at 190cm in the AFL pocket guide). HBF seems to be the obvious place to start him, though I wouldn't be surprised to see him develop into a key position defender.

                        Is anyone else curious about Roos' reluctance to move Kennelly further up field? He has, on several occasions, nominated Kennelly as a player who could become a top-line player and indicated that he will eventually play further up the ground. He says that Kennelly is still developing and needs more time on the HBF.

                        But he's never looked lost further up the ground and to me he looks bored senseless where he is at the moment. He has developed decent defensive skills but they are never going to be his strength and he doesn't have Leo's extraordinary ability to keep much taller opponents quiet.

                        Comment

                        • Old Royboy
                          Support Staff
                          • Mar 2004
                          • 879

                          #13
                          Originally posted by liz
                          He's listed at 192cm (and ROK has officially shrunk to 187cm per the Swans site but is still listed at 190cm in the AFL pocket guide).
                          In the team photo (in March Swans mag) there are four blokes together up back who appear to be within 1cm of each other - Nicky D, C Bolts, Alice and Dempster. In the same row, Malceski and rookies Grundy, Vogels & Quade appear about 2cm taller
                          Pay peanuts get monkeys

                          Comment

                          • satchmopugdog
                            Bandicoots ears
                            • Apr 2004
                            • 3691

                            #14
                            Liz,I agree with you about Kennelley. The body language was different to past years (almost same old same old..ho hum)
                            "The Dog days are over, The Dog days are gone" Florence and the Machine

                            Comment

                            • redunderthebed
                              Warming the Bench
                              • Jan 2003
                              • 173

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Old Royboy
                              The opposition in the was pretty non-existent, which can make it difficult to judge how blokes are going. With the likes of Spriggs, Fosdike, Saddington, Schmidt and Willloughby in the midfield, I haven?t seen such a strong reserves team for a long time, and that has to be good.

                              The first impression looking at the twos this year is that there are very few skinny kids these days. The second year players have bulked up a bit and all the new boys have a higher degree of physical development than in the past.

                              It seems that the reserves are being encouraged to play the ?run and gun? style. A few times one or other of the midfielders were caught HTB trying to do too much, but as the scoreboard showed they were generally successful.

                              Saddo looked confident, his judgement of the ball in the air was spot on, ran and marked well. He?ll be back pretty soon.

                              Spriggs and Fosdike had picnics. Spriggs displayed the usual quota of mongrel kicks, but unlike others I don?t think he is a lost cause. Given time to steady he gave some decent delivery and kicked two nice long goals. I have the feeling that accurate delivery when on the hard run is where he needs to work.

                              Eriksson has finally put on some bulk, and created a couple of goals from his good tapwork. Most encouraging.

                              Tim Schmidt is starting to impress. He is one midfielder who can hit a target lace out from 45m and did so several times yesterday.

                              Nick Potter was very busy, always at the bottom of the packs. His was one of the goals the scoreboard missed, a terrific snap under heavy pressure. Paul Bevan clone in gamestyle.

                              Nick Malceski is another looking good, confidence right back and marked well. Kicking for goal very ordinary though.

                              Dempster was impressive in the backline, but because of the midfield dominance he spent most of the game working on his suntan.

                              Mark Powell continues to frustrate. Reads the ball in the air well, but then drops the easy mark. I see this nearly every time he plays. Well down in the pecking order now.

                              Jarred Moore flashed in and out, but what he did was clean and well executed in the main. Ed Clarke seems to have gone backwards since North Sydney, didn?t get a lot of gametime.
                              this is hard when you don't want the complete quote BUT...good assessment by royboy and, as one of the few viewers of the reserves, there is no arguement.
                              i watched the second half and thought Moore was sensational in the last quarter.....he looks like Diesel to me.Also, Clarke took the 'mark of the year' running backwards into a pack and taking an incredible grab. Sensational !Pity the world didn't see it.

                              Comment

                              Working...