In this poll, attempt to predict Sydney's eventual finish to the 2005 season based on past seasons.
Sydney's 2005 season will be most similar to which year?
Collapse
X
-
Sydney's 2005 season will be most similar to which year?
411933 - and we're going to party like it's 1933....0%121996 - we make the Grand Final but lose it.0%12003 - We make the preliminary final but lose it.0%32004 - We win our way to a semi-final but lose it.0%81987 - Good season, but we lose both finals we play.0%12001 - We are only making up the numbers in finals.0%92002 - We perform well but miss the finals.0%01995 - We're just also-rans, but we have a big say in the makeup of the final 8.0%41994 - We have a bad season.0%21993 - We have a season so bad we get priority picks.0%1"Unbelievable!" -- Nick Davis leaves his mark on the 2005 semi finalTags: None -
-
2004 - I am an optimist. Winning a final three years in a row isn't something that the Swans have done since 1933-1936.
Amazing, the poll's all of three minutes old and five votes already...."Unbelievable!" -- Nick Davis leaves his mark on the 2005 semi finalComment
-
Originally posted by swansrule100
probably more like 1918
Besides, I thought I could only post 10 poll options."Unbelievable!" -- Nick Davis leaves his mark on the 2005 semi finalComment
-
Originally posted by Thunder Shaker
1918's is hardly possible because of the round 2 shocker. 1933 is more apt (and more recent) because in 1933 the Swans started off slowly (4/5 and 8th/12 after nine rounds)
sorry bruce
hopefully the end result is similar to collingwood 1927 28 29 30 (hope i have that right)Theres not much left to sayComment
-
2003. I was there.Vicky Pollard: Oh my god I so can't believe you just said that this is like the time I threw Anita's nokia in the canal as a joke and she's like you have well got to buy me another one and I'm like get over it and then Paul came over who's adopted anyway and started saying that I fancy Mark Bennett but oh my god just because I have sex with someone doesn't mean I fancy them.Comment
-
I was going to vote '97, but as that option wasn't available, I'd say '01 or '04.
Make finals and lose first or second.Last edited by NMWBloods; 7 April 2005, 06:34 PM.Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.
"[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."Comment
-
A bit of enlightenment for the options:
1933 - we win the flag, obviously.
1996 - we make the Grand Final but lose it
2003 - We make the preliminary final but lose it
2004 - We win our way to a semi-final but lose it. Finish 5th-8th, win first final, lose second
1987 - Finish 1st-4th, lose both finals
2001 - Finish 5th-8th, lose first final
2002 - Finish 9th or 10th
1995 - Finish 11th or 12th
1994 - I chose the wrong year here. I wanted a year where we finish 13th or 14th (not in the bottom two)
1993 - We have a season so bad we get priority picks. Self explanatory.
The journey is unimportant, it's the end of season finish plus finals results that is the topic of the poll."Unbelievable!" -- Nick Davis leaves his mark on the 2005 semi finalComment
-
i fear this season is going to be like last season,
but its very early yet and there is still a long way to go.Well done Craig Bolton for getting the co- captaincy in 2008.
Your determination,your tenacity and your under-rated skill is why you have become my favourite player!Comment
-
Originally posted by NMWBloods
I was going to vote '97, but as that option wasn't available, I'd say '01 or '04.
Make finals and lose first or second.Bloods
"Lockett is the best of all time" - Robert Harvey, Darrel Baldock, Nathan Burke, Kevin Bartlett, Bob SkiltonComment
-
1997 was such a rubbish year, i felt let down, i guess i expected we might win the flag after 1996Theres not much left to sayComment
Comment