Rd 6 Teams

[Mike_B]

From http://sydneyswans.com.au/default.as...ticleid=199318

WEST COAST
B: Chick, Glass, B.Jones
HB: Banfield, Hunter, Stenglein
C: Wirrpunda, Cousins, Braun
HF: Embley, Hansen, Sampi
F: Matera, Lynch, Seaby
FOLL: Cox, Judd, Fletcher
I/C: Adkins, Butler, Gardiner, Selwood
EMG: Graham, McConnell, Nicoski
NO CHANGE

SYDNEY
B: Crouch, Bolton, Dempster
HB: Barry, Roberts-Thomson, Kennelly
C: Nicks, Maxfield, Ablett
HF: O?Keefe, Goodes, Bevan
F: Spriggs, Hall, O?Loughlin
FOLL: Jolly, Kirk, Bolton
I/C: Buchanan, Davis, McVeigh, Schneider
EMG: Malceski, Moore, Schauble
IN: Maxfield,
OUT: Mathews

Would imagine Schauble will come in if Jolly's appeal doesn't get him off for this game.

[Matt79]

Re: Rd 6 Teams

Originally posted by Mike_B
From http://sydneyswans.com.au/default.as...ticleid=199318

WEST COAST
B: Chick, Glass, B.Jones
HB: Banfield, Hunter, Stenglein
C: Wirrpunda, Cousins, Braun
HF: Embley, Hansen, Sampi
F: Matera, Lynch, Seaby
FOLL: Cox, Judd, Fletcher
I/C: Adkins, Butler, Gardiner, Selwood
EMG: Graham, McConnell, Nicoski
NO CHANGE

SYDNEY
B: Crouch, Bolton, Dempster
HB: Barry, Roberts-Thomson, Kennelly
C: Nicks, Maxfield, Ablett
HF: O?Keefe, Goodes, Bevan
F: Spriggs, Hall, O?Loughlin
FOLL: Jolly, Kirk, Bolton
I/C: Buchanan, Davis, McVeigh, Schneider
EMG: Malceski, Moore, Schauble
IN: Maxfield,
OUT: Mathews

Would imagine Schauble will come in if Jolly's appeal doesn't get him off for this game.

Very interesting to see Nick Davis named on the bench. What does it say about his standing when there is no Williams, Matthews, Ball, Doyle, Jolly (most likely) etc. and Nick is still named on the bench?

Is there a subtle message there?

[ScottH]

Re: Re: Rd 6 Teams

Originally posted by Matt79
Is there a subtle message there?

Surprise!!!

[stellation]

Davis starting on the bench is a bit puzzling, even more so if come Saturday night he actually starts on the bench.

[robbieando]

So basically unless Jolly doesn't get off his charge, we have made just the ONE change to a side that is full of under-performing players and in need of some fresh blood. Gee way to make the kids out of the side think they have a shot of making the side. If I was Josh Willoughby at the moment, I would be think the senior side is a boys own club that you need some sort of membership to brake into.

[stellation]

Originally posted by robbieando
So basically unless Jolly doesn't get off his charge, we have made just the ONE change to a side that is full of under-performing players and in need of some fresh blood. Gee way to make the kids out of the side think they have a shot of making the side. If I was Josh Willoughby at the moment, I would be think the senior side is a boys own club that you need some sort of membership to brake into.

Roosy is certainly making a name for himself with his brave coaching decisions.

[ScottH]

Maybe there are too many, us and them groups!!

[hammo]

It seems the only way you miss out on the side is if your are injured, suspended or actually show some talent like McVeigh.

Maybe a trip to Subiaco isn't the time to make major changes but surely a few changes to jolt some of these players out of complacency was called for.

[ScottH]

So if Jolly remains suspended, who will come in for him.

Assuming it will be wet as well.


EMG: Malceski, Moore, Schauble???

[Legs Akimbo]

I would have liked to have seen

SYDNEY

B: Crouch, Bolton, Dempster
HB: Barry, Goodes, Bevan
C: Kennelly, Ablett, Spriggs
HF: O?Keefe, Hall, Davis
F: Schneider, O?Loughlin, McVeigh
FOLL: Jolly, Kirk, Bolton
I/C: Moore, Nicks, Maxfield, Schauble
EMG: Malceski, Buchanan,
IN: Maxfield,
OUT: Mathews
DELISTED: Roberts-Thomson

Actually, doing this exercise was quite hard and just illustrated to me how we have too many smaller running players and too few talls. I only named two emergencies, because I struggled to think of another person who deserved the gig.

[Mike_B]

Originally posted by ScottH
So if Jolly remains suspended, who will come in for him.

Assuming it will be wet as well.


EMG: Malceski, Moore, Schauble???

Well logic would say Schauble, but there seems to be no logic used in selecting the team (ie make one change which is injury-enforced after 2 totally insipid performances) so who knows who will come in if Jolly's appeal fails?

[RogueSwan]

Re: Re: Rd 6 Teams

Originally posted by Matt79
Very interesting to see Nick Davis named on the bench. What does it say about his standing when there is no Williams, Matthews, Ball, Doyle, Jolly (most likely) etc. and Nick is still named on the bench?

Is there a subtle message there?

As mentioned in other threads here the positions listed rarely resemble how the team lines up. Davis may start on the bench but that bench time could be < 1 min. like LRT last week.

[ugg]

Let's bring in Moore so our midgets can run in circles around their tall giants.

[Legs Akimbo]

Originally posted by ugg
Let's bring in Moore so our midgets can run in circles around their tall giants.

I'd rather see a new midget than one of the tired older failing midgets.

[sharpie]

Just another staggering move by the club in a week full of staggering moves.

I still cant see why they bothered appealing Jolly's ban. We're no chance of beating the Eagles, and with Jolly out next week, we are gonna struggle for talls against the Bombers, even if Ball is fit to come back. You need more than just 1 proper ruckman in the team.

Bevan has bee absolutely shocking this year, yet he is rewarded by promotion from the bench (albeit in just the side on paper, but it still is something, especially when it seems to make sense to have Davis on the HFF instead).

I would put money on the fact that we dont see Kennelly play in the midfield on Saturday night, despite Roos saying otherwise, based on how everything else seems to be going.

I'm getting a little sick of all this crap from my club. I want to see some hard decisions.