Do you want priority picks?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Slick Swans
    On the Rookie List
    • May 2003
    • 207

    Do you want priority picks?

    I've noticed allready a bit of talk going around that some people want the swans to lay down and play for draft picks. I was just interested to see what sort of mumber there were.

    So do u want the swans to lay down and play for picks, or give the rest of the season a red hot go with what we have and try to bust through for a come from behind premeirship.

    I definatly want the swans to give the season their best, even if they only limp into the finals, it better than losing all year to draft some bleached haired brat from melbourne who once we develop him will cry for mummy and go play for a melbourne team.
    40
    Yes, the further down the ladder the better
    0%
    10
    No, Never say die!
    0%
    30
    "Red and White for blood cells, Red and White for wine."
    "They could be the whole damn spectrum, if you just damn let them"
  • timthefish
    Regular in the Side
    • Sep 2003
    • 940

    #2
    Re: Do you want priority picks?

    Originally posted by Slick Swans
    I've noticed allready a bit of talk going around that some people want the swans to lay down and play for draft picks. I was just interested to see what sort of mumber there were.

    So do u want the swans to lay down and play for picks, or give the rest of the season a red hot go with what we have and try to bust through for a come from behind premeirship.

    I definatly want the swans to give the season their best, even if they only limp into the finals, it better than losing all year to draft some bleached haired brat from melbourne who once we develop him will cry for mummy and go play for a melbourne team.
    i definitely want the team put out on the paddock each week to do their best and for the time being the match commitee to select their strongest team each week. come the point where we're not getting any further (eg being 7-3 after 10 weeks) then i'd like to see a sincere youth development policy come in whereby we start working for next year.

    deliberately tanking a season for picks sickens me and hasn't been demonstrated to work anyway. apart from anything else, aren't the priority picks discarded?
    then again, i think it would be worth trying 15-16 players on field so what would i know

    Comment

    • ROK Lobster
      RWO Life Member
      • Aug 2004
      • 8658

      #3
      Re: Re: Do you want priority picks?

      Originally posted by timthefish
      i definitely want the team put out on the paddock each week to do their best and for the time being the match commitee to select their strongest team each week. come the point where we're not getting any further (eg being 7-3 after 10 weeks) then i'd like to see a sincere youth development policy come in whereby we start working for next year.

      deliberately tanking a season for picks sickens me and hasn't been demonstrated to work anyway. apart from anything else, aren't the priority picks discarded?
      Easier than me typing it.

      Comment

      • Schneiderman
        The Fourth Captain
        • Aug 2004
        • 1615

        #4
        Re: Do you want priority picks?

        Originally posted by Slick Swans
        So do u want the swans to lay down and play for picks
        Urgh!

        or give the rest of the season a red hot go with what we have and try to bust through for a come from behind premeirship.
        Wouldn't that be best way to push AFL along in this state?
        Our Greatest Moment:

        Saturday, 24th Sept, 2005 - 5:13pm

        Comment

        • desredandwhite
          Click!
          • Jan 2003
          • 2498

          #5
          Remember, draft picks are a consolation, not a reward - I keep saying that!

          At the end of the season, I want to be able to say one of two things:

          1) We are getting mid-range picks again, but at least we won a lot of games, or

          2) we lost a lot of games, but at least we are getting good draft picks.

          I don't want to say "hey, we got what we wanted, which was good draft picks" at the expense of trying our hardest to win each game.

          177th Senior AFL Match - Round 4, 2009 - Sydney vs Carlton, SCG. This is obviously out of date. I suppose I'll update it once I could be bothered sitting down with the fixture and working it out....
          Des' Weblog

          Comment

          • ScottH
            It's Goodes to cheer!!
            • Sep 2003
            • 23665

            #6
            Aren't the AFL re structuring the priority draft picks??

            There is no guarantee that draft picks will be available to Sydney after playing fianls footy for the last 2 years.


            Stupid thread.

            Comment

            • anne
              Regular in the Side
              • Sep 2003
              • 719

              #7
              The system isn't going to be changed this year so we had better get in and get good picks before other teams, such as Collingwood, Essendon and even Port (all teams who haven't had high picks for quite a while) take all the good players.How do you think Collingwood will get Jonathan Brown? Come last and have first pick in the pre-season draft and get him for nothing! ( I am not saying he will go but it is a good illustration of how the system works).
              ---------||--ANNE--||----------

              Comment

              • timthefish
                Regular in the Side
                • Sep 2003
                • 940

                #8
                Originally posted by anne
                The system isn't going to be changed this year so we had better get in and get good picks before other teams, such as Collingwood, Essendon and even Port (all teams who haven't had high picks for quite a while) take all the good players.How do you think Collingwood will get Jonathan Brown? Come last and have first pick in the pre-season draft and get him for nothing! ( I am not saying he will go but it is a good illustration of how the system works).
                i strongly feel that to play the season deliberately to come as low as possible is despicable. there is no way i will be renewing my membership to this club if i perceive them to take that tactic.

                secondly, players still get to name their price for the pre-season draft and i imagine brown will be asking 400-600 k per year, which is a long way off nothing so it's actually a really bad example of how your poor idea of a strategy works.

                tanking is the lowest idea in our game.
                Last edited by timthefish; 3 May 2005, 01:13 PM.
                then again, i think it would be worth trying 15-16 players on field so what would i know

                Comment

                • ScottH
                  It's Goodes to cheer!!
                  • Sep 2003
                  • 23665

                  #9
                  Tanking is being suggested on Bomber blitz as well.

                  Maybe all teams out of the top 4 could tank the rest of the year.

                  Comment

                  • swansrock4eva
                    On the Rookie List
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 1352

                    #10
                    Come on! It's only coming up for ROUND 7 - we could win every match from here, finish the season with 18 wins and romp it home in the finals to win the flag! I'd say unlikely, but you never know, and to start thinking about October/November in May is just plain stupid when we're not even deadset outright last.

                    Were Brisbane's fans calling for priority picks last week after they were bottom of the ladder?

                    Comment

                    • NMWBloods
                      Taking Refuge!!
                      • Jan 2003
                      • 15819

                      #11
                      I agree that it's too early to consider priority picks and finishing last, particularly as the next 7 weeks presents a good opportunity.

                      What baffles me more though is why people ever compare us to Brisbane supporters...
                      Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

                      "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

                      Comment

                      • swansrock4eva
                        On the Rookie List
                        • Jan 2003
                        • 1352

                        #12
                        I used it as an example because comparatively speaking, bottom of the ladder to a brisbane fan would be pretty harsh stuff given the heights of recent years. But I don't expect them to start saying "let's go the priority picks." I would expect supporters of clubs who have been well and truly down there like Hawthorn to maybe want to make the call about now, but for the rest of us, the thought of throwing matches when finals and even premierships can still be won is absurd. I'm not saying I think we are a chance if we keep on playing this way though, but I do think that if we switch on and get it right we can beat any team in the competition, and if we do that consistently, a premiership isn't that far away.

                        Comment

                        • Mark
                          Suspended by the MRP
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 578

                          #13
                          Re: Do you want priority picks?

                          Originally posted by Slick Swans
                          I was just interested to see what sort of mumber there were.
                          I believe there are many different types, i personally liked Ricky Martins modern version !

                          try Mumba.com/types

                          Comment

                          • dread and might
                            Back, strapped and intact
                            • Apr 2004
                            • 949

                            #14
                            tanking is lame, but it is up to the AFL to change the system in order for it to stop being an attractive option to clubs who are going poorly.
                            I wish my weed was EMO so it would cut itself

                            Comment

                            • Slick Swans
                              On the Rookie List
                              • May 2003
                              • 207

                              #15
                              Originally posted by dread and might
                              tanking is lame

                              Couldn't agree more! But yet so far 20% of voters on this poll have voted for it, so what does that say?
                              "Red and White for blood cells, Red and White for wine."
                              "They could be the whole damn spectrum, if you just damn let them"

                              Comment

                              Working...