Maxfield's injury

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 2
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 template Next
  • liz
    Veteran
    Site Admin
    • Jan 2003
    • 16844
    #1

    Maxfield's injury

    There's an article in today's Australian that says that Maxfield is thought to have a stress fracture in his knee.

    Could well be out for a few weeks.

    With Davis out for a month or so, Willo still the same time away from returning and question marks over the effectiveness of Spriggs, this must mean the door could open not only for McVeigh to return but maybe also a fourth debutant very soon in Malceski.
    Tags: injury, maxfield, Swans, sydney
    • Matt79
      Bring it on!
      • Sep 2004
      • 3143
      #2
      Re: Maxfield's injury

      Originally posted by liz
      There's an article in today's Australian that says that Maxfield is thought to have a stress fracture in his knee.

      Could well be out for a few weeks.

      With Davis out for a month or so, Willo still the same time away from returning and question marks over the effectiveness of Spriggs, this must mean the door could open not only for McVeigh to return but maybe also a fourth debutant very soon in Malceski.
      Absolutely. The midfield positions are up for grabs. I would think that McVeigh may come back in this week and perhaps one more youngster like you suggested...Malceski...here's hoping!
      Swannies for life!

        Comment

        • BonBon
          BMT2144
          • Jul 2004
          • 2190
          #3
          Looking forward to when they get back. And to think we beat Essendon when we had no Ball, Jolly, Davis, Maxfield and Williams.
          Vicky Pollard: Oh my god I so can't believe you just said that this is like the time I threw Anita's nokia in the canal as a joke and she's like you have well got to buy me another one and I'm like get over it and then Paul came over who's adopted anyway and started saying that I fancy Mark Bennett but oh my god just because I have sex with someone doesn't mean I fancy them.

            Comment

            • Sanecow
              Suspended by the MRP
              • Mar 2003
              • 6917
              #4
              To be fair, the filth were also missing pencil neck.

                Comment

                • NMWBloods
                  Taking Refuge!!
                  • Jan 2003
                  • 15819
                  #5
                  Originally posted by BonBon
                  Looking forward to when they get back. And to think we beat Essendon when we had no Ball, Jolly, Davis, Maxfield and Williams.
                  And to think Essendon were missing Hird, Solomon, Bradley, Hille, Haynes, Ramanauskas...

                  Like I say, people don't really follow the AFL...
                  Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

                  "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

                    Comment

                    • ScottH
                      It's Goodes to cheer!!
                      • Sep 2003
                      • 23665
                      #6
                      Originally posted by NMWBloods
                      And to think Essendon were missing Hird, Solomon, Bradley, Hille, Haynes, Ramanauskas...

                      Like I say, people don't really follow the AFL...
                      But they aren't really important to the team are they??????


                      You missed Allen as well!!

                        Comment

                        • NMWBloods
                          Taking Refuge!!
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 15819
                          #7
                          Originally posted by ScottH
                          You missed Allen as well!!
                          I had Allen but I deleted him as I wasn't sure whether he was injured or underperforming. Probably the former I guess given their lack of ruckmen.
                          Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

                          "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

                            Comment

                            • mocaholic
                              Regular in the Side
                              • Oct 2003
                              • 575
                              #8
                              How many games does Stuey have to get to hit 300? Isn't he on 290+? I'd like him to get there.

                              (And the fact that Allen didn't play on Sat night helped Essendon, not us!!)
                              Insert Your Life [HERE]

                                Comment

                                • Wazza
                                  Regular in the Side
                                  • May 2004
                                  • 805
                                  #9
                                  If McVeigh does come in and possibly Ball and Jolly who gets left out?

                                  Although not a big fan of McVeigh I dont see the point of keeping Spriggs out there and keeping a kid out, I would prefer Sunny or Malceksi to get a run.

                                  With both Saddington and Schauble now back who would be left out for Ball - Jolly and 1 small?

                                  Davis out - Sunny(probably not - too early) Malceksi(keep testing the list?) or McVeigh ( if he is included or not may tell us a fair bit about his standing on the list)

                                  Ball in ? Vogels LRT or Saddington out?

                                  Jolly in Vogels LRT or Saddington out?

                                  Can Vogels hold his place as Jolly or Ball would probably play a fair percentage of the game up forward with Goodes in the ruck and Saddington back?

                                  Will we try to re-invent Saddington as a CHF?

                                  Who they want to pick up Tredrea will probably be the deciding factor in all this, with Jolly and Ball back Goodes may get the job? or more likely Barry? LRT may be needed purely for his height?

                                  A fascinating week ahead for selection which could reveal a lot on how the selectors see certain players.

                                  Sorry for just rambling on with my thoughts.

                                  Cheers

                                  Waz

                                    Comment

                                    • ScottH
                                      It's Goodes to cheer!!
                                      • Sep 2003
                                      • 23665
                                      #10
                                      Swans won't risk Maxfield

                                      Swans won't risk Maxfield
                                      Sydney winger Stuart Maxfield's immediate playing future remains in doubt after scans last week revealed a stress fracture in his left knee.
                                      Could be bye bye Stu.

                                        Comment

                                        • ScottH
                                          It's Goodes to cheer!!
                                          • Sep 2003
                                          • 23665
                                          #11
                                          Originally posted by mocaholic
                                          How many games does Stuey have to get to hit 300? Isn't he on 290+? I'd like him to get there.

                                          (And the fact that Allen didn't play on Sat night helped Essendon, not us!!)
                                          Maxfield remains 11 games short of his 300 AFL game milestone.

                                            Comment

                                            • stellation
                                              scott names the planets
                                              • Sep 2003
                                              • 9737
                                              #12
                                              Originally posted by Wazza
                                              Can Vogels hold his place as Jolly or Ball would probably play a fair percentage of the game up forward with Goodes in the ruck and Saddington back?
                                              I hope so, he is a much more mobile tall forward than Ball or Jolly would be and will hopefully line up around HF again. Ball or Jolly rest across FF. Not that it matters at the SCG of course.
                                              I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
                                              We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his time

                                                Comment

                                                • Sean
                                                  On the Rookie List
                                                  • Sep 2003
                                                  • 327
                                                  #13
                                                  Originally posted by Wazza
                                                  Ball in ? Vogels LRT or Saddington out?

                                                  Jolly in Vogels LRT or Saddington out?

                                                  Can Vogels hold his place as Jolly or Ball would probably play a fair percentage of the game up forward with Goodes in the ruck and Saddington back?
                                                  It'll be interesting. I'd like us to continue with LRT but based on this choice, I'd rather that he was the one to makeway. Vogels and Saddington both deserve to keep their spots. Hopefully we'll find a way to keep all three.

                                                    Comment

                                                    • liz
                                                      Veteran
                                                      Site Admin
                                                      • Jan 2003
                                                      • 16844
                                                      #14
                                                      It could be as straightforward as Jolly for Davis, especially if they are cautious with Ball.

                                                      I suspect Spriggs is the only other one who's place might come into question given than Roos has highlighted poor turnovers as something he wants to eliminate. I reckon Spriggs vs McVeigh will be the only major discussion at the selection table this week.

                                                        Comment

                                                        • Sanecow
                                                          Suspended by the MRP
                                                          • Mar 2003
                                                          • 6917
                                                          #15
                                                          Three losses followed by a win is almost enough to go in with no changes after the win (except Davis obviously). I assume that Ball is still injured

                                                            Comment

                                                            Previous 1 2 template Next
                                                            Working...