Malceski in (at this stage), Davis the only out

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ROK Lobster
    RWO Life Member
    • Aug 2004
    • 8658

    Malceski in (at this stage), Davis the only out

    SYDNEY
    B: Schauble, Bolton, Dempster
    HB: Barry, Roberts-Thomson, Kennelly
    C: Mathews, Ablett, Crouch
    HF: O?Keefe, Vogels, Bevan
    F: Jolly, Hall, O?Loughlin
    FOLL: Goodes, Kirk, Bolton
    I/C (from): Buchanan, Malceski, McVeigh, Moore, Saddington, Schneider, Spriggs
    IN: Jolly, Malceski, McVeigh, Schneider
    OUT: Davis (hamstring)
    NEW: Nick Malceski (Eastern Ranges)
  • ROK Lobster
    RWO Life Member
    • Aug 2004
    • 8658

    #2
    Good to see Vogels named at CHF, let's hope he does not sustain a late 'injury'.

    Comment

    • Newbie
      On the Rookie List
      • Mar 2003
      • 720

      #3
      Good to see that LRT is named at CHB too. That means his experiment is continuing .

      Comment

      • Charlie
        On the Rookie List
        • Jan 2003
        • 4101

        #4
        Congrats Malceskisy!
        We hate Anthony Rocca
        We hate Shannon Grant too
        We hate scumbag Gaspar
        But Leo WE LOVE YOU!

        Comment

        • ROK Lobster
          RWO Life Member
          • Aug 2004
          • 8658

          #5
          Originally posted by Charlie
          Congrats Malceskisy!
          LOL, quite good Charlie.

          Comment

          • ScottH
            It's Goodes to cheer!!
            • Sep 2003
            • 23665

            #6
            Weather:

            Sunday : A shower or two. S/SE winds.

            Sydney: 13 21

            Comment

            • robbieando
              The King
              • Jan 2003
              • 2750

              #7
              Originally posted by Charlie
              Congrats Malceskisy!
              I would wait until the final line up is named tomorrow night

              Still hopefully this means Spriggs gets the axe and we allow someone with a FUTURE to play.
              Once was, now elsewhere

              Comment

              • Charlie
                On the Rookie List
                • Jan 2003
                • 4101

                #8
                IN: Jolly, McVeigh, Malceski

                OUT: Davis, Spriggs, Bevan (is it possible to be dropped from the 22 if you're named in the starting 18?)

                Rob - whether he plays or not, it's a sign that he's very close. Has he been named as an emergency before?
                We hate Anthony Rocca
                We hate Shannon Grant too
                We hate scumbag Gaspar
                But Leo WE LOVE YOU!

                Comment

                • liz
                  Veteran
                  Site Admin
                  • Jan 2003
                  • 16778

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Charlie
                  Has he been named as an emergency before?
                  Last week I think.

                  Bevan won't be dropped.

                  Be surprised (and disappointed) if Moore doesn't get at least one more go in this run. Can't see Saddo dropping out, not Monty after a very good game last week.

                  That means it should come down to one of Schneider, Spriggs, McVeigh or Malceski. If anyone is going to come in it would probably be McVeigh. However, I notice that he has already been announced as one of the players to attend this week's aftermatch at the MA Noble, along with a handful of other reserves players. That leads me to believe that Spriggs will retain his spot.

                  Comment

                  • Bleed Red Blood
                    Senior Player
                    • Sep 2003
                    • 2057

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Charlie
                    IN: Jolly, McVeigh, Malceski

                    OUT: Davis, Spriggs, Bevan (is it possible to be dropped from the 22 if you're named in the starting 18?)
                    I hope so, those would be my changes too.

                    Originally posted by Charlie
                    Rob - whether he plays or not, it's a sign that he's very close. Has he been named as an emergency before?
                    Once at least.

                    Comment

                    • robbieando
                      The King
                      • Jan 2003
                      • 2750

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Charlie
                      IN: Jolly, McVeigh, Malceski

                      OUT: Davis, Spriggs, Bevan (is it possible to be dropped from the 22 if you're named in the starting 18?)


                      Yes, "IF" your injuried. But if your named in the 18 you are certain to play barring some late mishap, so at this stage if Spriggs is axed it will be between McVeigh and Malceski for that spot on the bench. I'm more inclined to think McVeigh would get the call, but you never know with the coaching staff (and that means they could name Schneider instead of McVeigh and Malceski)

                      Rob - whether he plays or not, it's a sign that he's very close. Has he been named as an emergency before?
                      Yes, for the Eagles game. Not doubting he is close or anything, but I rather wait until he is in the side for sure before conratulating him.
                      Once was, now elsewhere

                      Comment

                      • Barry Schneider
                        On the Rookie List
                        • Sep 2003
                        • 530

                        #12
                        Taking a guess I don't think Malceski will play.
                        Buchanan deserves his spot, so does Moore and Saddington.
                        McVeigh was best afield in the reserves with 8 goals and 40 posessions.If he doesn't get a call up he will be stuck there forever.
                        I think the naming of Malceski is a reward for a good game in reserves(according to the report he was second to McVeigh as best player) and a bit of encouragement.
                        Roos stated early last week that Moore was going to play his first game so if Malceski was going to play I thought more would have been made of it.
                        But who knows.

                        Comment

                        • Snowy
                          On the Rookie List
                          • Jun 2003
                          • 1244

                          #13
                          If you're in the actual 18 you will play unless you're withdrawn through injury.
                          LIFE GOES ON

                          Comment

                          • NMWBloods
                            Taking Refuge!!
                            • Jan 2003
                            • 15819

                            #14
                            I'd love to see Malceski play, but I think McVeigh will get a gig.

                            I think the bench will be Buchanan, McVeigh, Moore, Saddington

                            BTW - is that the shortest (height wise) extended bench ever!
                            Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

                            "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

                            Comment

                            • BonBon
                              BMT2144
                              • Jul 2004
                              • 2190

                              #15
                              Malceksi! Yipee! <3!
                              Vicky Pollard: Oh my god I so can't believe you just said that this is like the time I threw Anita's nokia in the canal as a joke and she's like you have well got to buy me another one and I'm like get over it and then Paul came over who's adopted anyway and started saying that I fancy Mark Bennett but oh my god just because I have sex with someone doesn't mean I fancy them.

                              Comment

                              Working...