The score would suggest it was. But was it actually just another ugly game by the swans?
Personally, I had an absolute ball at the game. Despite the low scoring, I thought the game was interesting enough, and I was too busy bagging the umpires to be disappointed about how boring the swans may have been playing. And if we'd scored 15.9 instead of 9.15, the score would not have been as reflective of an ugly win.
So, was I overlooking the ugliness, or was it genuinely a better game than what we've been experiencing for many of the other games this season so far?
Personally, I had an absolute ball at the game. Despite the low scoring, I thought the game was interesting enough, and I was too busy bagging the umpires to be disappointed about how boring the swans may have been playing. And if we'd scored 15.9 instead of 9.15, the score would not have been as reflective of an ugly win.
So, was I overlooking the ugliness, or was it genuinely a better game than what we've been experiencing for many of the other games this season so far?

Comment