So after two weeks of Kirk and one week of Leo, how are the candidates stacking up. Here is my list:
Scores awarded out of ten for each game. Consideration should be given to result of the game, quality of opponent, performance of the individual when Captain, any obvious impacts they personally make to influence the result (positive or negative):
1. Kirk - 17/20 (9 and 8). Blinder against Essendon, being top with disposals and helping conjure a come-from-behind victory. Much quieter against Port, but helped shut down their midfield to ensure a gritty win. His obvious encouragement of junior players around him gives him big points.
2. Leo - 7/10. Coming off two huge weeks he was unsually quiet this week against the dogs. Still he kept Robert Murphy out of the game, again only allowing him to take marks well outside the 50 and on the wings. His influence in the backline helped limit the scoring opportunities, but overall it was not his best game.
Thoughts?
Scores awarded out of ten for each game. Consideration should be given to result of the game, quality of opponent, performance of the individual when Captain, any obvious impacts they personally make to influence the result (positive or negative):
1. Kirk - 17/20 (9 and 8). Blinder against Essendon, being top with disposals and helping conjure a come-from-behind victory. Much quieter against Port, but helped shut down their midfield to ensure a gritty win. His obvious encouragement of junior players around him gives him big points.
2. Leo - 7/10. Coming off two huge weeks he was unsually quiet this week against the dogs. Still he kept Robert Murphy out of the game, again only allowing him to take marks well outside the 50 and on the wings. His influence in the backline helped limit the scoring opportunities, but overall it was not his best game.
Thoughts?

Comment