Gerard Healy has lost the plot...

[SimonH]

Originally posted by NMWBloods
Why do you have to choose? You can just whinge or provide solutions or a bit of both. Either way the coaching staff are going to do what they choose to do, not listen to some half-baked supporters or media.

Fair point that for some people, on one day it might be one thing, and on one day another. The question remains the same, though: do people see the function of RWO as primarily psychological/community (allowing people to get stuff off their chest, enabling Swans fans to chat) or practical (kicking around ideas for real-life improvement of the team and club)?

Your view seems to be the former, i.e. that Roos and staff should be ignoring the opinions on RWO and in the media (including, obviously, your own) in terms of formulating a game plan.

I don't have any problem with that. They are, after all, the dudes getting paid for this, and we're not. It just struck me from other posts that you had a different opinion on the topic.

[NMWBloods]

I'd like to think that we could produce ideas that could make a difference.

However, practically that's very unlikely.

Still, I think it is interesting to discuss suggestions and changes. At least it helps when venting.

[Schneiderman]

Originally posted by NMWBloods
]However, practically that's very unlikely.

Aww come on.

So far RWO can confidently claim the following decisions:
1. Put Goodes in the ruck again
2. Drop Spriggs
3. Rotate the captaincy (well we couldn't make up our mind on the poll could we?)
4. Play Vogels.

Until we decide the LRT argument, and what the new game plan should be, Roos will not change things.

[ROK Lobster]

Originally posted by Schneiderman
Aww come on.

So far RWO can confidently claim the following decisions:
1. Put Goodes in the ruck again
2. Drop Spriggs
3. Rotate the captaincy (well we couldn't make up our mind on the poll could we?)
4. Play Vogels.

Until we decide the LRT argument, and what the new game plan should be, Roos will not change things.

Perhaps we could start a hooped socks campaign, just as a test case.

[cruiser]

Originally posted by ROK Lobster
Perhaps we could start a hooped socks campaign, just as a test case.

I will NEVER agree to those lollipop hooped socks! I would go back to supporting Richmond if they became permanent!

[Charlie]

Originally posted by cruiser
I will NEVER agree to those lollipop hooped socks! I would go back to supporting Richmond if they became permanent!

... That's the sort of deep, dark secret that you don't admit to in polite society.... kinda like 'my parents were brother and sister, but they didn't know that 'til after I came along...'

[ScottH]

Originally posted by Charlie
... That's the sort of deep, dark secret that you don't admit to in polite society.... kinda like 'my parents were brother and sister, but they didn't know that 'til after I came along...'

WOW, who woulda thought Charlie was Tasmanian!!!

BTW I like the Hooped socks.

[Charlie]

Originally posted by ScottH
WOW, who woulda thought Charlie was Tasmanian!!!

BTW I like the Hooped socks.

Hey... note the 'quotation marks'.

[ScottH]

Originally posted by Charlie
Hey... note the 'quotation marks'.

My eyes struggle to focus on vertical lines!!!!

(That is actually true, however, glasses help)

[footyhead]

I agree with Heally.