Tweet
On League Teams this evening on Fox Footy (and if Walls had been sitting next to him he wouldn't have been able to agree quickly enough) Mike states that Goodes has to take Pavlich this weekend.
Not because there aren't any other options - they highlighted Leo, B2 and the Hyphen as other possibilities.
No, the reason that Goodes has to play on Pavlich is that he is not accountable enough and needs to learn.
Now excuse me Mr Sheahan, but aren't you one of the leading voices in the outcry against the Swans for concentrating too much on negating the opposition rather than trying to make the play themselves? Yet you would take arguably the Swans' most naturally offensive midfielder (certainly in the absence of Willo) and make him tag the opposition playmaker to teach him a lesson.
Pavlich is in great form and needs to be minded, sure, but the only way I want to see Goodes matched up against him is if all other options have failed, or if it is in the same role that Willo played against Judd in the QF last year.
Why doesn't Sheahan wonder who Freo have to run with Goodes other than Pavlich?
Not because there aren't any other options - they highlighted Leo, B2 and the Hyphen as other possibilities.
No, the reason that Goodes has to play on Pavlich is that he is not accountable enough and needs to learn.
Now excuse me Mr Sheahan, but aren't you one of the leading voices in the outcry against the Swans for concentrating too much on negating the opposition rather than trying to make the play themselves? Yet you would take arguably the Swans' most naturally offensive midfielder (certainly in the absence of Willo) and make him tag the opposition playmaker to teach him a lesson.
Pavlich is in great form and needs to be minded, sure, but the only way I want to see Goodes matched up against him is if all other options have failed, or if it is in the same role that Willo played against Judd in the QF last year.
Why doesn't Sheahan wonder who Freo have to run with Goodes other than Pavlich?
Comment