Changes for Melbourne match

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Snowy
    On the Rookie List
    • Jun 2003
    • 1244

    Changes for Melbourne match

    In Malcheski, Scheider and out Moore and McVeigh.
    LIFE GOES ON
  • Snowy
    On the Rookie List
    • Jun 2003
    • 1244

    #2
    And Nicholson is out injured for the Dees. They have made 4 changes overall.
    LIFE GOES ON

    Comment

    • Bayes30
      On the Rookie List
      • Dec 2003
      • 39

      #3
      MELBOURNE
      B: Whelan, Ferguson, Yze
      HB: Bizzell, Rivers, Wheatley
      C: Greene, Johnstone, Moloney
      HF: Sylvia, Holland, Davey
      F: Read, Neitz, Robertson
      FOLL: White, Bruce, McDonald
      I/C: Ward, Williams, Brown, Carroll
      EMG: Johnson, Armstrong, Rigoni
      IN: Holland, Ferguson, Carroll, Williams
      OUT: Miller (hamstring), Nicholson (back strain), Heffernan, Jamar

      SYDNEY
      B: Dempster, Barry, C.Bolton
      HB: Mathews, Roberts-Thomson, Kennelly
      C: Buchanan, Ablett, Crouch
      HF: O?Keefe, Hall, J.Bolton
      F: Davis, O'Loughlin, Goodes
      FOLL: Jolly, Kirk, Williams
      I/C: Ball, Fosdike, Malceski, Schneider
      EMG: McVeigh, Moore, Saddington
      IN: Malceski, Schneider
      OUT: McVeigh, Moore

      Comment

      • BonBon
        BMT2144
        • Jul 2004
        • 2190

        #4
        Good stuff.
        Vicky Pollard: Oh my god I so can't believe you just said that this is like the time I threw Anita's nokia in the canal as a joke and she's like you have well got to buy me another one and I'm like get over it and then Paul came over who's adopted anyway and started saying that I fancy Mark Bennett but oh my god just because I have sex with someone doesn't mean I fancy them.

        Comment

        • Grant
          On the Rookie List
          • Jan 2003
          • 579

          #5
          Great move,i am very happy with that side
          The Future is Bright,The Future is Red And White.

          Comment

          • liz
            Veteran
            Site Admin
            • Jan 2003
            • 16738

            #6
            Wonder who is going to ruck for the Dees if White gets tired or injured. Doesn't even look to be a ruck pinch-hitter in that line-up.

            Comment

            • Bleed Red Blood
              Senior Player
              • Sep 2003
              • 2057

              #7
              I believe Holland has done it previously. (Ruckman pinch hitting)

              I think it's fantastic the Dees brought Williams and Carroll in!

              Comment

              • Snowy
                On the Rookie List
                • Jun 2003
                • 1244

                #8
                Johnson is an emergency so he could be a late replacement for someone.
                LIFE GOES ON

                Comment

                • Damien
                  Living in 2005
                  • Jan 2003
                  • 3713

                  #9
                  Really happy with that side.

                  I am a fan of McVeigh, but he was very average last week. Hopefully some time in the 2's will sort him out....

                  Comment

                  • cruiser
                    What the frack!
                    • Jul 2004
                    • 6114

                    #10
                    Maybe Schneider' last chance. Looks good. I reckon we'll win - wish I was coming down for it.
                    Occupational hazards:
                    I don't eat animals since discovering this ability. I used to. But one day the lamb I was eating came through to me and ever since then I haven't been able to eat meat.
                    - animal psychic Amanda de Warren

                    Comment

                    • Bleed Red Blood
                      Senior Player
                      • Sep 2003
                      • 2057

                      #11
                      Comparing it to the round six team...

                      B: Crouch, Bolton, Dempster
                      HB: Barry, Roberts-Thomson, Kennelly
                      C: Nicks, Maxfield, Ablett
                      HF: O?Keefe, Goodes, Bevan
                      F: Spriggs, Hall, O?Loughlin
                      FOLL: Jolly, Kirk, Bolton
                      I/C: Buchanan, Davis, McVeigh, Schneider
                      EMG: Malceski, Moore, Schauble
                      IN: Maxfield,
                      OUT: Mathews

                      Comment

                      • dimelb
                        pr. dim-melb; m not f
                        • Jun 2003
                        • 6889

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Bayes30

                        SYDNEY
                        B: Dempster, Barry, C.Bolton
                        HB: Mathews, Roberts-Thomson, Kennelly
                        C: Buchanan, Ablett, Crouch
                        HF: O?Keefe, Hall, J.Bolton
                        F: Davis, O'Loughlin, Goodes
                        FOLL: Jolly, Kirk, Williams
                        I/C: Ball, Fosdike, Malceski, Schneider
                        EMG: McVeigh, Moore, Saddington
                        IN: Malceski, Schneider
                        OUT: McVeigh, Moore
                        Not a bad team, but I'd still like to see Schauble there. And I suppose it means that Leo will be on Neitz? For Pete's sake!
                        He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

                        Comment

                        • robbieando
                          The King
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 2750

                          #13
                          Originally posted by dimelb
                          Not a bad team, but I'd still like to see Schauble there. And I suppose it means that Leo will be on Neitz? For Pete's sake!
                          God help us if Leo get's injuried early on.
                          Once was, now elsewhere

                          Comment

                          • sfan
                            Warming the Bench
                            • May 2003
                            • 487

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Damien
                            Really happy with that side.

                            I am a fan of McVeigh, but he was very average last week. Hopefully some time in the 2's will sort him out....
                            McVeigh's finishing to kick goals needs improving big time. He misses goals that good footballers should kick. If he cannot fix that problem then I would trade him.

                            Comment

                            • stellation
                              scott names the planets
                              • Sep 2003
                              • 9718

                              #15
                              Originally posted by sfan
                              McVeigh's finishing to kick goals needs improving big time. He misses goals that good footballers should kick. If he cannot fix that problem then I would trade him.
                              I honestly don't know what the problem is, he kicks bags of goals with ease in the magoos and a lot of his misses running forward he has little pressure on him. Someone needs to tell him that it's the same size goals in the magoos as when he is in the seniors (not as well put as the famous scene from Hoosiers... I think it was Hoosiers...). One thing to take confidence from is he manages to read the play extremely well to get himself into a position for a good shot on goal.
                              I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
                              We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his time

                              Comment

                              Working...