Take Schauble to Adelaide

[giant]

But it's a consultant's dream - you can say everything & nothing at the same time!

I can increasingly see its application for RWO now that I think about - Roosy AND ROK should be using it for their respective Q&A sessions.

[Sanecow]

I let my pee pee do the talking too.

[cruiser]

Originally posted by Mark
Why ?

That match committe has picked a side that has won 9 of the last 11 games

Is that a low point ?

My comment has nothing to do with our current form and you know that. You are twisting it for the sake of an argument.

[stellation]

If Paul Roos is trying to make an outrageously attractive man cry he certainly is succeeding.

[dimelb]

Originally posted by Snowy
I think that Schauble is almost finished. He's too slow for most forwards, his disposal remains highly questionable, even his decision-making can be costly given that he plays in the last line of defence.

Has anyone seen Schauble play in the twos? How is his speed? Any FB would have trouble with speedsters like Gehrig or Neitz over the first twenty metres, but I think he might still be able to trouble Cox, Gardiner,Lade and a few others.
As I remember his disposal it was OK.
In any case I thought a significant part of his value down back was as an organiser - not too much wrong with his decision making either.

[Mark]

Originally posted by cruiser
My comment has nothing to do with our current form and you know that. You are twisting it for the sake of an argument.

You said Schaubles 'treatment' by the match committee was a low point of the season.

What are you basing that on then ?

Are you privy to the match committee discussions or have you discussed it with Schauble ?

Failing either of those things, you would have to base picking the right side on results, would you not ?

[Go Swannies]

Originally posted by Mark
You said Schaubles 'treatment' by the match committee was a low point of the season.

What are you basing that on then ?

Are you privy to the match committee discussions or have you discussed it with Schauble ?

Failing either of those things, you would have to base picking the right side on results, would you not ?

I thought we were the match committee! And now the bloody coach has overruled this thread and isn't taking Schaubs to Adelaide.

When will he learn? (Hopefully, not on Saturday night.)

[barry]

Originally posted by Go Swannies
I thought we were the match committee! And now the bloody coach has overruled this thread and isn't taking Schaubs to Adelaide.

When will he learn? (Hopefully, not on Saturday night.)

He's taking an extra tall, but Vogels over Schuable.
Now, from reading the reserves match reports on here, Schuabs has been far more impressive in the 2's, so as much as its great to give young kids a go, shouldnt we be concentrating on getting our best 25 or so players ready for this years finals ?? Developing players can be done in the first 15 rounds next year.


Roos' @@@@s me sometimes.

[NMWBloods]

I think if we're going to do well in finals we will need another tall, possibly a CHF. Possibly he's trying to blood Vogels for this.

We need another big defender against StKilda and Melbourne. Not sure who else we really need Schauble against. Possibly Lynch (WC).

[barry]

Originally posted by NMWBloods
I think if we're going to do well in finals we will need another tall, possibly a CHF. Possibly he's trying to blood Vogels for this.

Maybe, but he's leaving it a little late.

We need another big defender against StKilda and Melbourne. Not sure who else we really need Schauble against. Possibly Lynch (WC).

IMO Schuable should be used as FB on a needs basis. But to get up to speed for the Gehigs and Neitz's he needs a few runs in the seniors first.

[ScottH]

Originally posted by stellation
If Paul Roos is trying to make an outrageously attractive man cry he certainly is succeeding.

I haven't been crying???

Roos probably wants to put an extra tall i nthe forward line to stretch their defence.

[NMWBloods]

Originally posted by barry
Maybe, but he's leaving it a little late.

IMO Schuable should be used as FB on a needs basis. But to get up to speed for the Gehigs and Neitz's he needs a few runs in the seniors first.

Yep and yep.

[Ruck'n'Roll]

Originally posted by dimelb
Has anyone seen Schauble play in the twos? How is his speed?

Schauble looks completely fit to me, his speed seems much as it has always been.

[Mike_B]

Originally posted by NMWBloods
Yep and yep.

Hang on, something wrong here....Bloods agreeing with barry

[Snowy]

The fact that Schauble's not emergency indicates how he's rated at the moment perhaps?