Saddo vs Dempster

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sharpie
    On the Rookie List
    • Jul 2003
    • 1588

    Saddo vs Dempster

    Where is Saddo at? I assume he is fully fit as he's played in the last few ressies games, and has featured in the team's best.

    Coming into the business end of the season, would he be a better choice as a half back flanker than Dempster, who currently is doing a decent defensive job, but probable doesnt give us that much drive forward.
    Visit my eBay store -

    10% off for mentioning RWO when you buy. Great Christmas presents!
  • cruiser
    What the frack!
    • Jul 2004
    • 6114

    #2
    Re: Saddo vs Dempster

    Originally posted by sharpie
    Coming into the business end of the season, would he be a better choice as a half back flanker than Dempster, who currently is doing a decent defensive job, but probable doesnt give us that much drive forward.
    No, Schauble would be the best choice, with his intelligent football and accurate disposal out of defence.
    Occupational hazards:
    I don't eat animals since discovering this ability. I used to. But one day the lamb I was eating came through to me and ever since then I haven't been able to eat meat.
    - animal psychic Amanda de Warren

    Comment

    • stellation
      scott names the planets
      • Sep 2003
      • 9721

      #3
      Re: Re: Saddo vs Dempster

      Originally posted by cruiser
      No, Schauble would be the best choice, with his intelligent football and accurate disposal out of defence.
      Love him as I do, would he really be the best choice for HBF?
      I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
      We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his time

      Comment

      • sharpie
        On the Rookie List
        • Jul 2003
        • 1588

        #4
        Re: Re: Re: Saddo vs Dempster

        Originally posted by stellation
        Love him as I do, would he really be the best choice for HBF?
        I think Cruiser means to move Leo to HBF and put Schauble in at FB.

        That's a different argument, about whether Schauble is in Roos' plans for FB anymore, or if he prefers Leo's mobility and Speed against the slower, bulkier full forwards.
        Visit my eBay store -

        10% off for mentioning RWO when you buy. Great Christmas presents!

        Comment

        • mocaholic
          Regular in the Side
          • Oct 2003
          • 575

          #5
          In: Saddo
          Out: Mathews

          You know it makes sense.
          Insert Your Life [HERE]

          Comment

          • Nico
            Veterans List
            • Jan 2003
            • 11339

            #6
            Originally posted by mocaholic
            In: Saddo
            Out: Mathews

            You know it makes sense.
            Both ordinary. Put in someone who has a future at the club and has something to offer. Schmidt must be close.
            http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

            Comment

            • Mike_B
              Peyow Peyow
              • Jan 2003
              • 6267

              #7
              Can't see Schmidt getting a game this year barring any major run of injuries. All games have too much riding on them to throw a kid in, untried. Looks like he will have to wait for 2006.

              I'm on the Chandwagon!!!

              If you cannot compete for the premiership, it's better to be young and exciting than middle-aged and dowdy.

              Comment

              • liz
                Veteran
                Site Admin
                • Jan 2003
                • 16778

                #8
                Originally posted by Mike_B
                Can't see Schmidt getting a game this year barring any major run of injuries. All games have too much riding on them to throw a kid in, untried. Looks like he will have to wait for 2006.
                Was just commenting to a colleague that I thought Schmidt might be in with a chance this weekend if Jude fails to come up. He deserves a go, and Malceski and Moore have already been given a taste.

                I think it's important that the likes of Schmidt and Willoughby see that senior football is a realistic goal in the near future or they might leave to seek opportunities elsewhere.

                Comment

                • Sean
                  On the Rookie List
                  • Sep 2003
                  • 327

                  #9
                  Originally posted by liz
                  I think it's important that the likes of Schmidt and Willoughby see that senior football is a realistic goal in the near future or they might leave to seek opportunities elsewhere.
                  That's starting to concern me a bit too because, from what I have seen, they both look like they will make it as AFL players. Most kids would expect to get a taste of first team footy during their second year so I could understand them being a bit disappointed. They are both South Australians too from memory so lack of game time would definitely increase the levels of "homesickness".

                  Comment

                  • NMWBloods
                    Taking Refuge!!
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 15819

                    #10
                    Wasn't Willoughby our highest draft pick? Why hasn't he had a go yet?
                    Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

                    "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

                    Comment

                    • ROK Lobster
                      RWO Life Member
                      • Aug 2004
                      • 8658

                      #11
                      Originally posted by NMWBloods
                      Wasn't Willoughby our highest draft pick? Why hasn't he had a go yet?
                      He has legs like toothpicks. I don't know if it is the reason, but it could be. Looks very breakable.

                      Comment

                      • cruiser
                        What the frack!
                        • Jul 2004
                        • 6114

                        #12
                        Re: Re: Re: Saddo vs Dempster

                        Originally posted by stellation
                        Love him as I do, would he really be the best choice for HBF?
                        Woops, sorry, I didnt read the post properly. I was reading back flanker (as in back pocket). I think I need to get more sleep. Maybe I just want to see solid, safe, sensible Schauble somewhere, anywhere, in our back line.
                        Occupational hazards:
                        I don't eat animals since discovering this ability. I used to. But one day the lamb I was eating came through to me and ever since then I haven't been able to eat meat.
                        - animal psychic Amanda de Warren

                        Comment

                        • Charlie
                          On the Rookie List
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 4101

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Sean
                          That's starting to concern me a bit too because, from what I have seen, they both look like they will make it as AFL players. Most kids would expect to get a taste of first team footy during their second year so I could understand them being a bit disappointed. They are both South Australians too from memory so lack of game time would definitely increase the levels of "homesickness".
                          It's definitely frustrating - obviously for them but also for us. The question is, who do you drop?

                          Hall, O'Keefe, Bolton, Williams, Jolly, Kennelly, O'Loughlin, Ablett, Barry, Bolton, Ball, Crouch, Roberts-Thomson, Kirk, Buchanan and Goodes aren't going anywhere - especially for midfielders in most cases.

                          Davis has been a bit disappointing in recent weeks as far as I'm concerned, but going into the finals he's not going to be dropped either. That leaves Mathews, Fosdike, Schneider, Dempster and Vogels. Of those, Mathews is probably safe, even if he shouldn't be.

                          So that's four spots for them to compete for... along with McVeigh, Maxfield, Saddington, Schauble, Moore and Malceski, all of whom probably have stronger claims. Unfortunately, I just don't see how we can squeeze them in.
                          We hate Anthony Rocca
                          We hate Shannon Grant too
                          We hate scumbag Gaspar
                          But Leo WE LOVE YOU!

                          Comment

                          • cruiser
                            What the frack!
                            • Jul 2004
                            • 6114

                            #14
                            Re: Re: Re: Re: Saddo vs Dempster

                            Originally posted by sharpie
                            I think Cruiser means to move Leo to HBF and put Schauble in at FB.

                            That's a different argument, about whether Schauble is in Roos' plans for FB anymore, or if he prefers Leo's mobility and Speed against the slower, bulkier full forwards.
                            Yes, I think that too. Leo was getting flogged by Lloyd in the first half on Saturday night and I was sitting there wishing Schauble was at least on the bench so that he could be brought on. I think Leo's run is much better used in the half back line.
                            Occupational hazards:
                            I don't eat animals since discovering this ability. I used to. But one day the lamb I was eating came through to me and ever since then I haven't been able to eat meat.
                            - animal psychic Amanda de Warren

                            Comment

                            • cruiser
                              What the frack!
                              • Jul 2004
                              • 6114

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Charlie
                              The question is, who do you drop?
                              ...... That leaves Mathews....
                              Question answered.
                              Occupational hazards:
                              I don't eat animals since discovering this ability. I used to. But one day the lamb I was eating came through to me and ever since then I haven't been able to eat meat.
                              - animal psychic Amanda de Warren

                              Comment

                              Working...