Dogs' "home game" to stay?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • liz
    Veteran
    Site Admin
    • Jan 2003
    • 16778

    Dogs' "home game" to stay?

  • BayseysLeftBoot
    On the Rookie List
    • Jan 2004
    • 523

    #2
    The AFL shouldn't allow teams to play their home games at opposition venues, It's completely unfair. The draw is allready uneven enough.

    Comment

    • Matt79
      Bring it on!
      • Sep 2004
      • 3143

      #3
      Originally posted by BayseysLeftBoot
      The AFL shouldn't allow teams to play their home games at opposition venues, It's completely unfair. The draw is allready uneven enough.
      If you were a Bulldogs supporter I would agree with your sentiments, however being a Swannies fan, I'll take any extra advantage we can, including an extra game on our home turg the SCG.

      In any case, it's the Bulldogs decision, they are not forced to play up here.
      Swannies for life!

      Comment

      • swansrock4eva
        On the Rookie List
        • Jan 2003
        • 1352

        #4
        Originally posted by BayseysLeftBoot
        The AFL shouldn't allow teams to play their home games at opposition venues, It's completely unfair. The draw is allready uneven enough.
        I don't want to get into the Sydney vs Melbourne stuff that mention of this games brings up, but in plain, unbiased, logical terms, Sydney and Brisbane have the most travel of any teams in the comp (numbers of games, not kilometers) without having an extra "away" game at home, so doesn't it actually even the draw up just a teensy bit for those teams to play an "away" match on their home turf?

        Comment

        • BayseysLeftBoot
          On the Rookie List
          • Jan 2004
          • 523

          #5
          Originally posted by swansrock4eva
          I don't want to get into the Sydney vs Melbourne stuff that mention of this games brings up, but in plain, unbiased, logical terms, Sydney and Brisbane have the most travel of any teams in the comp (numbers of games, not kilometers) without having an extra "away" game at home, so doesn't it actually even the draw up just a teensy bit for those teams to play an "away" match on their home turf?
          What about WC and Freo? Besides the fact that it robs me of an extra oppourtunity to watch the swans play I don't believe in the idea full stop. It gives the away teams an unfair advantage over teams fighting them for ladder positions. I don't have a problem with teams moving their games to mutual venues such as manuka or hobart. The uneven way in which the AFL fixture is drawn is allready laughable. No other sport in the world would employ such ridiculous ideas in a profesional league.

          Comment

          • Damien
            Living in 2005
            • Jan 2003
            • 3713

            #6
            Originally posted by BayseysLeftBoot
            What about WC and Freo? .
            By playing each other twice - they get an away game at Subiaco, so they each play 12 at Subi.

            Brisbane and Sydney also get that advantage now by the games bought from Melbourne and the Bulldogs.

            I love it, a home game is a home game. I get the Melbourne fans totally, but if the AFL look after us with 6 or 7 still down there still, the Swans win full stop.

            Comment

            • Bear
              Best and Fairest
              • Feb 2003
              • 1022

              #7
              Originally posted by swansrock4eva
              I don't want to get into the Sydney vs Melbourne stuff that mention of this games brings up, but in plain, unbiased, logical terms, Sydney and Brisbane have the most travel of any teams in the comp (numbers of games, not kilometers) without having an extra "away" game at home, so doesn't it actually even the draw up just a teensy bit for those teams to play an "away" match on their home turf?
              We get 11-12 true home games, whereas many Vic teams get virtually neutral home games when they play other Vic teams at the MCG, etc, so it's a pretty complex discussion. You have to consider all of the issues if you are going to properly analyse it.
              "As a player he simply should not have been able to do the things he did. Leo was a 185cm, 88kg full-back and played on some of the biggest, fastest and best full-forwards of all time, and constantly beat them." Roos.
              Leo Barry? you star! We'll miss ya, ''Leapin''.

              Comment

              • Go Swannies
                Veterans List
                • Sep 2003
                • 5697

                #8
                Originally posted by Bear
                You have to consider all of the issues if you are going to properly analyse it.
                That's never stopped us on any other topic.

                Comment

                • NMWBloods
                  Taking Refuge!!
                  • Jan 2003
                  • 15819

                  #9
                  Normally on most topics discussion consists of branding people as negative or moaners, unless they're positive. Considering all the issues and analysing would be anathema to some in the context of football.
                  Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

                  "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

                  Comment

                  • giant
                    Veterans List
                    • Mar 2005
                    • 4731

                    #10
                    Originally posted by NMWBloods
                    Normally on most topics discussion consists of branding people as negative or moaners, unless they're positive. Considering all the issues and analysing would be anathema to some in the context of football.
                    I had one of those anethemas once & I certainly wouldn't want to be doing it with a football.

                    Comment

                    • NMWBloods
                      Taking Refuge!!
                      • Jan 2003
                      • 15819

                      #11
                      Originally posted by giant
                      I had one of those anethemas once & I certainly wouldn't want to be doing it with a football.
                      I hope they used lots of oil!!
                      Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

                      "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

                      Comment

                      • Go Swannies
                        Veterans List
                        • Sep 2003
                        • 5697

                        #12
                        Originally posted by NMWBloods
                        Normally on most topics discussion consists of branding people as negative or moaners, unless they're positive. Considering all the issues and analysing would be anathema to some in the context of football.
                        Now there's a spray to relieve anathema!

                        (I'm quite proud of the puns in that sentence.) You forget to add that: positive = Pollyanna for many, too. But we do go into some depth there - for superficial try BigFooty.

                        Comment

                        • Go Swannies
                          Veterans List
                          • Sep 2003
                          • 5697

                          #13
                          Originally posted by NMWBloods
                          I hope they used lots of oil!!
                          What ever happened to "no pain, no gain"?

                          Comment

                          • NMWBloods
                            Taking Refuge!!
                            • Jan 2003
                            • 15819

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Go Swannies
                            Now there's a spray to relieve anathema!
                            Amazing how people's first thoughts on this word go to enema!

                            (I'm quite proud of the puns in that sentence.) You forget to add that: positive = Pollyanna for many, too. But we do go into some depth there - for superficial try BigFooty.
                            I think Roget's Thesaurus have added BigFooty to its list of synonyms for superficial!
                            Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

                            "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

                            Comment

                            • Go Swannies
                              Veterans List
                              • Sep 2003
                              • 5697

                              #15
                              I was thinking asthma! You, no doubt, had your mind somewhere in the Ponds institute with the Ponds Cold Cream and other essential oils.

                              But as much as I laughed - I bet we better go back to footy discussion or this thread will go to that great unravelling place known only to moderators.

                              Over at BigFooty you just have to post that the Swans are great and the other teams can't/won't/don't want to win finals and that keeps the gang happy for hours of diatribes.

                              Comment

                              Working...