ROK - Trade Bait

[Go Swannies]

And Ben Mathews had a pretty good game last night - one of the Swans who was actually playing.

[OldE]

I often notice ROK and Craig Bolton teaming up- Craig gets it in the defensive fifty, runs a little way, kicks it to ROK, who then sends it into our forward 50. It's one of our few clean, quick attacks. We rarely get the ball into our F50 that efficently. Why break that up? I think it's more important than we realise.

[Provost]

I wonder if Jason Akermanis is reading this

[midaro]

Originally posted by eirinn
I often notice ROK and Craig Bolton teaming up- Craig gets it in the defensive fifty, runs a little way, kicks it to ROK, who then sends it into our forward 50. It's one of our few clean, quick attacks. We rarely get the ball into our F50 that efficently. Why break that up? I think it's more important than we realise.

I love it!
You're saying ROK and C Bolton are our Phil and Jimmy Krakouer?
They have some magical synergy on the field?
That's got to be the silliest reason against a trade in the history of thought.
Brilliant! I'm won ever.

[NMWBloods]

Originally posted by Nico
IAnyone remember the dills who had Goodesy up for trade?

Besides his Brownlow year, he's hardly been a superstar.

[midaro]

Goodes would be tradeable right now if it wasn't for the fact that he will be required to ruck next year (given Ball's absence).

[dimelb]

ROK is a very good forward who kicks goals (OK, he could be straighter this season) and always takes a good defender. In addition he has become an excellent link man, one of our better delivery boys into the F50. It would have to be a PK or the like on offer before I would dream of trading him.
And trade Goodes? You're dreamin'.

[Schneiderman]

Jees some of the pathetic crap that gets written on here!

For a start, have a look at ROK's stats for the second half of the season, when we were winning all of those games. He was rated at the very top for long kicks, and F50 entries.

And last night, the one goal that sparked the run on came from.... a long bomb from ROK straight to Nick Davis' advantage against two Geelong defenders. In fact there were two Swans players versus 5 Geelong players in the area.

Mind you, the same people were advising the Swans to trade Nick Davis last year, because apparently he is a head case

Is it too much to ask people to stop talking trade drivel until AFTER we have completed this season?? FFS there is still one game to go at the very least, and whose to say ROK, or Hall or Goodes wont be the 2005 Norm Smith Medlaist??

[R-1]

TRADE JUDE BOLTON.

Ok, maybe not.

*wanders away to sleep*

[ManchesterCityF]

ROK for M.Michael

Win/win

[connolly]

Originally posted by NMWBloods
Let's if he can finally perform in a final next week. However, if we could swap him for a very good key position defender or gun midfielder, I'd suggest we do it!

Aker? We wouldn't lose anything in the spunk department either

[Mark]

Originally posted by Nico
I reckon if this thread goes to 4 pages or more he will win the Brownlow next year.

Anyone remember the dills who had Goodesy up for trade?

Yeah i remember those experts, sadly they are still at it

A little bit of knowledge is very dangerous

[NMWBloods]

Originally posted by Schneiderman
And last night, the one goal that sparked the run on came from.... a long bomb from ROK straight to Nick Davis' advantage against two Geelong defenders. In fact there were two Swans players versus 5 Geelong players in the area.

I wouldn't say the kick was really placed to Davis' advantage.

Mind you, the same people were advising the Swans to trade Nick Davis last year, because apparently he is a head case

Same people? - I don't think so.

[EMJ]

This thread is going nowhere - all crap talk about trades - trade O'Keefe - come on wake up.

[NMWBloods]

Don't like it? Don't read it!