Campbelltown Big improvers
Collapse
X
-
-
Comment
-
Three reported, not sure if their going to the tribunal. A couple of high shots and one tried to put someone through the fence. Obviously thought that was how they might win the game by taking it up to the young fellasThe edge is not the limit, It's just the starting point...Comment
-
hahaha, ece koalas, where do you come up with such a funny one!
the blues did play well, and should be congratulated on their performance, however not the smash fest you are hearing though, sure three players reported, however in context of the game they were very soft, free kick worthy yes on two of offenses at best.
players number 24, 32 and number 9 in orange though should be commended for there performance, with a game like that they are certainties to start in rep game. playing that is not umpiring seeming they love to get in game so much.Comment
-
in all three cases there was nothing in each of the shots it was just 1 umpire that had it in for us and pulled the cards out at first sight of a high shot. all three players should be cleared,Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Lovett, Adam EAST COAST EAGLES 04/07/09 19.2.2 (g) (ii) - striking another person Set Penalty Accepted 0 match Andrew Rutherford
Physick, Ben EAST COAST EAGLES 04/07/09 19.2.2 (g) (ii) - striking another person Set Penalty Accepted 0 match Damian Anderson
Sankey, Michael EAST COAST EAGLES 04/07/09 19.2.2 (g) (vi) - throwing or pushing another play Set Penalty Accepted 1 match
Looks like it's better to punch than to push !Comment
-
in all three cases there was nothing in each of the shots it was just 1 umpire that had it in for us and pulled the cards out at first sight of a high shot. all three players should be cleared.
a/ looking at the above, the first two blokes were reported by a different umpire.Abit different to your point.
b/ In regard to your final sentence, of course they would be cleared.They are from ECE.Comment

Comment