AFL gets tough with players

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The Boot
    A Blood to the bootstraps
    • Mar 2004
    • 544

    AFL gets tough with players



    "The Australian Football League has vowed to rip up player contracts and impose hefty fines if women are paid hush money to prevent making an official sexual assault complaint."

    I'm not sure that payments prevent women from making complaints. There are plenty of matters that were found to not have enough, or any, evidence to go on. The case with MOL and Hueskas illustrated how quickly someone can get caught up in a questionable situation. Wrong place - wrong time, perhaps? A legal minefield this one if u ask me.
    Good men do good deeds. Evil men do evil deeds. But it takes religion for a good man to do evil deeds.
  • giant
    Veterans List
    • Mar 2005
    • 4731

    #2
    I agree Boot - good to see the AFL taking a hard line on these things but there is a real presumption of guilt line behind these reports. Looks like casual sex is a thing of the past for AFL players from this report - unless it's with each other of course.

    Comment

    • Stevie Wright
      On the Rookie List
      • Sep 2005
      • 150

      #3
      They can still pay for it though?
      "We love you Stevie"

      Lady that sat in the row behind me in 1987

      Comment

      • giant
        Veterans List
        • Mar 2005
        • 4731

        #4
        Good point - but then it becomes more professional than casual I guess. Perhaps could become part of their sponsorship package?

        Comment

        • ScottH
          It's Goodes to cheer!!
          • Sep 2003
          • 23665

          #5
          Hmmm. How will this impact the groupies out there??

          Comment

          • Sanecow
            Suspended by the MRP
            • Mar 2003
            • 6917

            #6
            I don't think cancelling contracts for being involved in an assault and buying your way out is "getting tough".

            Comment

            • giant
              Veterans List
              • Mar 2005
              • 4731

              #7
              Oh no - Sanecow has assumed the moral high ground again!

              Comment

              • Stevie Wright
                On the Rookie List
                • Sep 2005
                • 150

                #8
                Originally posted by ScottH
                Hmmm. How will this impact the groupies out there??
                They could start charging
                "We love you Stevie"

                Lady that sat in the row behind me in 1987

                Comment

                • Stevie Wright
                  On the Rookie List
                  • Sep 2005
                  • 150

                  #9
                  Originally posted by giant
                  Good point - but then it becomes more professional than casual I guess. Perhaps could become part of their sponsorship package?
                  They could wear advertising on their jerseys
                  "We love you Stevie"

                  Lady that sat in the row behind me in 1987

                  Comment

                  • Sanecow
                    Suspended by the MRP
                    • Mar 2003
                    • 6917

                    #10
                    Originally posted by giant
                    Oh no - Sanecow has assumed the moral high ground again!
                    If you think disapporoving of sexual assault is high moral ground you must be a real piece of work.

                    Comment

                    • giant
                      Veterans List
                      • Mar 2005
                      • 4731

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Sanecow
                      If you think disapporoving of sexual assault is high moral ground you must be a real piece of work.
                      O'Loughlin said in a statement when his involvement was made public: "This whole matter has caused me considerable distress and the only reason I agreed to contribute to a payment was to save my family from the trauma which would have come from defending my innocence."

                      Now put to one side whether this is actually what happened or not - let's assume for a moment it did. Should MO'L lose his only realistic career as a result?

                      Comment

                      • Sanecow
                        Suspended by the MRP
                        • Mar 2003
                        • 6917

                        #12
                        Originally posted by giant
                        O'Loughlin said in a statement when his involvement was made public: "This whole matter has caused me considerable distress and the only reason I agreed to contribute to a payment was to save my family from the trauma which would have come from defending my innocence."

                        Now put to one side whether this is actually what happened or not - let's assume for a moment it did. Should MO'L lose his only realistic career as a result?
                        If he got involved in something and paid money to hush it up, yes.

                        Comment

                        • singaporeswan
                          Fandom of Fabulousness
                          • Oct 2003
                          • 4220

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Sanecow
                          If he got involved in something and paid money to hush it up, yes.
                          Agree

                          Comment

                          • giant
                            Veterans List
                            • Mar 2005
                            • 4731

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Sanecow
                            If he got involved in something and paid money to hush it up, yes.
                            what's the bad part? getting involved or paying the money? or is it the combination?

                            Not a fan of guilt by association myself but each to their own.

                            Comment

                            • Sanecow
                              Suspended by the MRP
                              • Mar 2003
                              • 6917

                              #15
                              Originally posted by giant
                              what's the bad part? getting involved or paying the money? or is it the combination?

                              Not a fan of guilt by association myself but each to their own.
                              I'm not a fan of men whacking off in the bush while their mates have sex without consent in the immediate vicinity but each to their own.

                              Comment

                              Working...