-
Re: Re: Reserves
I bought myself a conductor's hat AND a french maid's uniform for Mrs Lobster. I take David Spriggs more seriously than youOriginally posted by Sanecow
Bandwagon jumper!
I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his timeComment
-
Re: Re: Re: Reserves
Oh, I'm serious. Deadly serious.Comment
-
Did you buy Mrs Lobster anything?I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his timeComment
-
No, but I gave her something.Comment
-
That is serious.I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his timeComment
-
Oi!Comment
-
"The Swans have a bye next week"....
thats helpful.
Can I ask my fellow RWO forumers - can anyone name one player that has played regularly in the Seniors that DIDN'T play at Port Melbourne?
I know its only 2 years but jeez the standard is about a good country league in Victoria.Comment
-
This is the 4th year. Sydney did not make the finals in the first 2. The competition does not start for another fortnight. This game was brought forward so as there could be a curtain raiser. The QBN boys were at least 2 weeks underdone, not that any of them are full time footballers.Originally posted by Foreign Legion
"The Swans have a bye next week"....
thats helpful.
Can I ask my fellow RWO forumers - can anyone name one player that has played regularly in the Seniors that DIDN'T play at Port Melbourne?
I know its only 2 years but jeez the standard is about a good country league in Victoria.Comment
-
It was warm and the score was blown out in the final quarter when it looked like the whole pro athletes versus butchers thing kicked in. It was a much better contest before that.Originally posted by ROK Lobster
This is the 4th year. Sydney did not make the finals in the first 2. The competition does not start for another fortnight. This game was brought forward so as there could be a curtain raiser. The QBN boys were at least 2 weeks underdone, not that any of them are full time footballers.I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his timeComment
-
Well, I thought it was round 1 according to the Footy Record.Originally posted by ROK Lobster
This is the 4th year. Sydney did not make the finals in the first 2. The competition does not start for another fortnight. This game was brought forward so as there could be a curtain raiser. The QBN boys were at least 2 weeks underdone, not that any of them are full time footballers.
Yep, good on the QBN lads - they tried bloody hard and no.1 the FF was pretty good - would be handy at most sides but they are nowhere near VFL standard. I dont expect 'em to be, as you say they are part timers. I am not saying this to disparage the ACTAFL but more about the need for our young blokes to be really tested.Comment
-
You think so?Originally posted by stellation
It was warm and the score was blown out in the final quarter when it looked like the whole pro athletes versus butchers thing kicked in. It was a much better contest before that.
They kicked 2 goals in the first qtr so doesnt give em much after that.
I wouldnt have called it a contest after the first 15-20 minutes.Comment
-
I do think it made it look worse than it was, we scored around 70 points in the final quarter. The porn lads had a go early on.I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his timeComment
-
Paul Bevan - I know he seemed to go backwards last year, but that isn't uncommon and it's too soon to tell whether he will really "make it". He did finish 4th in the RS in his debut season.Originally posted by Foreign Legion
Can I ask my fellow RWO forumers - can anyone name one player that has played regularly in the Seniors that DIDN'T play at Port Melbourne?
Dempster - not totally established but maybe on his way.
McVeigh and Malceski are two others who wouldn't have seen Port Melbourne action, though neither has yet established himself at senior level.
Not sure we can draw any definite conclusions yet because since we started participating in the ACT competition, the depth of the squad hasn't really been tested. The fact that we don't have a raft of players coming through from tthe reserves can be attributed as much to the form and health of the premiership side as to a lack of development of the youngsters.Comment
-
Well, Bevan is probably one but McVeigh and Malceski are two that have stagnated due to the ACTAFL - McVeigh was no.5 pick for heavens sake! He has been unlucky - if we still had the Port link he'd be close to a ready made player now. Dempster luckily played in the TAC cup - the best junior standard but the guys from W.A. and S.A. havent played in that comp.Originally posted by liz
Paul Bevan - I know he seemed to go backwards last year, but that isn't uncommon and it's too soon to tell whether he will really "make it". He did finish 4th in the RS in his debut season.
Dempster - not totally established but maybe on his way.
McVeigh and Malceski are two others who wouldn't have seen Port Melbourne action, though neither has yet established himself at senior level.
Not sure we can draw any definite conclusions yet because since we started participating in the ACT competition, the depth of the squad hasn't really been tested. The fact that we don't have a raft of players coming through from tthe reserves can be attributed as much to the form and health of the premiership side as to a lack of development of the youngsters.
Look at Willoughby and Schmidt and to a lesser extent, Davis - they will struggle to adapt to AFL seniors. The difference is pressure and fitness cant really get around it.
Earl Shaw is a guy who would benefit greatly from playing in the VFL against good ruckmen - sadly he plays against fellas who are 2 inches shorter and nowhere near as fit.Comment
- If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
- RWO Forum Rules (PLEASE READ FIRST)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your posts may be deleted, without warning or notification at moderator discretion, for breach of any of the RWO rules set out below. If you have any questions or concerns about post/thread removal, please feel free to PM a moderator or Email us at [email protected]
Do not post your queries on the main boards. Such posts WILL be removed, without further explanation.
Constant breaches of the rules will result in your access to RWO being reduced as the Moderator / Administrator group see fit. RWO uses the vBulletin Infraction System to deal with breaches of the RWO rules. All Infractions have an expiry date. Such an expiry date may be as short as 10 days or as long as 6 months. Multiple infractions, depending on the number of points a member accumulates, WILL result in temporary bans from the site and CAN result in a permanent ban. Please note that some Infractions have an expiry date of "Never" and WILL result in the RWO member being banned from the site immediately.
1) Signatures / Avatars
Keep signatures under 4 lines of standard sized fonts (if you must use large fonts, use just one line) as a courtesy to all users who read the forums.
Do not use signatures / avatars as an opportunity to make jibes at other forum members. This will be considered to be sniping (refer Rule 6 below). You may not refer to another RWO forum member, or quote anything they have written, without permission from that member. Using an anonymous tag does not make it acceptable. If quotes are not removed, we reserve the right to remove them, without notification. If in doubt as to whether something is acceptable or not, don't use it!
2) Spamming
Advertising for personal commercial purposes is NOT permitted. Placing links to sites that other users may find of interest / personal websites is acceptable within reason (ie constantly posting links will be frowned upon).
3) Deliberately avoiding the RWO swear filter
RWO is a site that is accessible by Swans supporters of all ages and walks of life. A swear filter is in place to mask offensive words and phrases. This swear filter contains offensive words and variant spellings of offensive words to stop you from deliberately avoiding the swear filter. Do not attempt to avoid the swear filter through alternate spelling of offensive words. Do not attempt to avoid the swear filter by devising systems to fool the swear filter in its recognition of offensive words.
4) Inappropriate Language / Excessive swearing
RWO is a site that is accessible by Swans supporters of all ages and walks of life. Moderators will let some minor cases through. Anything deemed to be of poor taste or of an offensive nature may be removed at moderator discretion. Consider all members when posting; what you think is funny, not all members will feel the same way.
5) Trolling / Baiting
Deliberately posting on threads in an attempt to stir / bait other RWO users will not be tolerated.
6) Flaming / Sniping / Abuse / Insulting other members
If you have to have a go at someone personally, take it off the boards. Everyone else doesn't need to see your hissy fits. Remember, "Play the ball, not the man". This includes spouses or partners. If you don''t like a post, don't flame, snipe, abuse or insult in response - it makes the job of moderation much harder. Report the post through the forum reporting mechanism (click on the Triangle with the exclamation mark) and let the Moderator / Administrator group deal with it.
7) Legal issuesa) The Moderator / Administrator group will keep a very close eye on threads discussing rumours or anything that could be potentially libellous. Moderators and Administrators are not interested in the chance of legal action regardless of how small - if deemed that there is ANY threat to RWO potentially, we will come down hard on it.
b) Due to potential issues of copyright infringement and the potential legal implications, posting of complete articles is NOT permitted. If necessary, post a link to the article. Where appropriate, you may quote sections of the article to aid in discussion.
c) Due to potential issues of copyright infringement and potential legal implications, posting of links to "live streaming (of AFL games)" and "AFL content" sites that are not AFL endorsed is NOT permitted. Posts with such links will be removed immediately and infraction points will be issued.
d) Freedom of speech does NOT = freedom to slander
8) Racial / Sexual Discrimination / Villification
It is not acceptable for members to engage in racial and/or sexual discrimination / villification. It is not acceptable for members to use terminology in describing race or gender in a derogatory manner. Discussing and disputing the views and opinions of other posters is acceptable. Personally vilifying or abusing others for having certain characteristics, or being a member of a certain group (or because you think they're a member of a certain group), is not. This rule shall apply to any post attacking race, skin colour, ethnic background, gender and sexuality.
See also: ---> RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ACT 1975 - SECT 9
See also: ---> RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ACT 1975 - SECT 18C
9) Prohibited
Anything deemed to be of Adult content or porn related nature will be removed immediately. Selling or offering of drugs, drug references, other than those openly discussed and identified in the press, will also be removed immediately. Breaches of this rule carry the highest infraction points and may result in permanent bans on a first offence.
10) Off-topic Posts
Some members prefer to just read Swans or footy related posts. This is, after all, a SSFC website. Ensure you post threads in the appropriate forum, or they will be moved. While threads will sometimes move away from the original topic, do not deliberately drag a thread away from its original subject.
11) Attachments
Attachments within the size limit prescribed are permitted. However, due to costs associated with uploads/downloads, if you wish to attach a number of files within a thread, or feel that the quality of the attachment is compromised by the file size restrictions, you may wish to use external hosting providers and link to the files there.
12) Moderator / Administrator Group
The Moderator / Administrator group reserve the right to delete or move threads / posts as well as remove signatures / avatars as necessary according to the rules of the RWO forum.
13) Final decisions
Any decisions made around the intepretation of the rules above are entirely at the discretion of the site administrators. Such decisions are final.
14) Vistitors from other sites
You are most welcome to join in discussions on RWO, but remember, you are a GUEST on our site. Abide by the RWO Forum Rules or we WILL ban you.
15) Guidelines regarding Visitors to RWO for RWO members.
Be nice, not all visitors are trolls.a) If they annoy you, ignore them. They want a reaction. Don't give them one.
b) If they are abusive, report them. We will consider banning them. Don't stoop to their level.Bottom line
You are a guest on RWO - You are expected to play by the rules of the house.
Last Update: ScottH, June 22nd, 2008 (Included Spouses/partners in Rule 6)
Last Update: Frog, August 16th, 2010 (Added rule 7c)
Last update: ScottH July 17th, 2011 (Added Rule 7d)
Tweet
© RedAndWhiteOnline.com 2003-
Powered by vBulletin® Version 6.0.6
Copyright © 2025 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2025 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
All times are GMT+10. This page was generated at 06:34 PM.
Comment