Originally posted by The Big Cat
Are there some mathematical implications here? Does Willoughby have to be twice as good to wear 14? Was Kels only 66.6% as good as Leo? Is Crouchy twice as good as Kels was? But wait! Where does that leave BBBBH? Surely he's more than one 14th as good as Kels or Skilts!
But I think 14 is more than just a number, it has a reputation that must be fulfilled. Think how much flak Matthews has gotten because he "took" Plugger's number 4.
Are there some mathematical implications here? Does Willoughby have to be twice as good to wear 14? Was Kels only 66.6% as good as Leo? Is Crouchy twice as good as Kels was? But wait! Where does that leave BBBBH? Surely he's more than one 14th as good as Kels or Skilts!
But I think 14 is more than just a number, it has a reputation that must be fulfilled. Think how much flak Matthews has gotten because he "took" Plugger's number 4.
It is important to remember Paul Kelly did not become a superstar overnight he played plenty of reserves footy, in my opinion Willoughby will develop into a fine league footballer and the no 14 jumper may well sit nicely on his back.
cheers Ian

Comment