Round 11: the other games.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dejavoodoo44
    Veterans List
    • Apr 2015
    • 8488

    #16
    26-12 free kick count. Hmm.

    Comment

    • imuninformedtwo
      Warming the Bench
      • Aug 2024
      • 348

      #17
      Originally posted by dejavoodoo44
      From fleeting glances, I'm trying to work out what the tattoo on the upper left arm of Liberatore is? It could be a drunken self portrait? It could be his mum? It could be one of The Three Stooges? It could be a tribute to the botched art restoration, known as the Monkey Christ?
      It's all forgiven, given he also has a Homer Simpson tattoo

      Comment

      • dejavoodoo44
        Veterans List
        • Apr 2015
        • 8488

        #18
        Originally posted by imuninformedtwo

        It's all forgiven, given he also has a Homer Simpson tattoo
        Oh, I'm not really against his choices. It's just that I find his choices amusingly eccentric.

        Comment

        • Mountain Man
          Regular in the Side
          • Feb 2008
          • 907

          #19
          Apologies also for a Non-football post, but I also am so suspicious of the Geelong sombrero cap.


          Does anyone know what powers the AFL Integrity Unit have? Do draftees grant permission for access to bank accounts, tax returns, etc?

          Comment

          • stevoswan
            Veterans List
            • Sep 2014
            • 8543

            #20
            Originally posted by dejavoodoo44
            26-12 free kick count. Hmm.
            Against the Pups....WOW! I put a comment up on the youtube match highlights regarding a blatant throw by a Dogs player, saying that 'they get away with this @@@@ every week!'

            I'm expecting some choice replies now!

            Comment

            • stevoswan
              Veterans List
              • Sep 2014
              • 8543

              #21
              Originally posted by Mountain Man
              Apologies also for a Non-football post, but I also am so suspicious of the Geelong sombrero cap.


              Does anyone know what powers the AFL Integrity Unit have? Do draftees grant permission for access to bank accounts, tax returns, etc?
              In Cats players cases, Swiss bank accounts!

              Comment

              • dejavoodoo44
                Veterans List
                • Apr 2015
                • 8488

                #22
                I've just noticed that the 4.15pm Brisbane v Hawthorn game, is listed in the TV guide as being shown live in Queensland on 7mate. I'm wondering if that's a mistake, or if the powers that be, are now starting to rethink the irksome policy, of only having delayed free to air coverage on Saturdays?

                Comment

                • imuninformedtwo
                  Warming the Bench
                  • Aug 2024
                  • 348

                  #23
                  Carlton are such trash. That they couldn’t beat the Giants with such a depleted midfield shows what a C-grade team they are. The Melbourne pundits have long overrated their list.

                  As for Toby Greene, what a game in his 250th.

                  Comment

                  • dejavoodoo44
                    Veterans List
                    • Apr 2015
                    • 8488

                    #24
                    The Lions v Hawks is now live on free to air in Queensland. I wonder if it's some sort of aberration, or is it the start of more live free to air games on Saturdays?

                    Comment

                    • mcs
                      Travelling Swannie!!
                      • Jul 2007
                      • 8149

                      #25
                      Originally posted by dejavoodoo44
                      The Lions v Hawks is now live on free to air in Queensland. I wonder if it's some sort of aberration, or is it the start of more live free to air games on Saturdays?
                      I had a feeling - I could be very wrong on this. That it was something like the first dozen weeks or so were exclusive on pay TV, and then there were a handful of weeks across the rest of the year where there might be a match or two on FTA - I can't quite remember.
                      "You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."

                      Comment

                      • imuninformedtwo
                        Warming the Bench
                        • Aug 2024
                        • 348

                        #26
                        Oh dear. Dyl Stephens just had a moment to sum up his career.

                        Great run down tackle, over excited, panics, corners himself, literally kicks a ball sideways, 40m away from any Norf player, turnover, Pies mark inside 50.

                        He’s had an ok game defensively and possie wise, but just loses his head and misses kicks.

                        You hope he makes and he’s played some better footy this year but the nervous Nelly in him shines through.

                        Comment

                        • liz
                          Veteran
                          Site Admin
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 16729

                          #27
                          Originally posted by imuninformedtwo
                          Oh dear. Dyl Stephens just had a moment to sum up his career.

                          Great run down tackle, over excited, panics, corners himself, literally kicks a ball sideways, 40m away from any Norf player, turnover, Pies mark inside 50.

                          He’s had an ok game defensively and possie wise, but just loses his head and misses kicks.

                          You hope he makes and he’s played some better footy this year but the nervous Nelly in him shines through.
                          Norf are going OK though. I'm keeping half an eye on the scores rather than watching the game. But I might need to tear myself away from a cumbersome uni assignment to watch the final quarter.

                          Comment

                          • imuninformedtwo
                            Warming the Bench
                            • Aug 2024
                            • 348

                            #28
                            Originally posted by liz

                            Norf are going OK though. I'm keeping half an eye on the scores rather than watching the game. But I might need to tear myself away from a cumbersome uni assignment to watch the final quarter.
                            Norf have some of the elements of a good side. Sheezel, McKercher and O’Sullivan will slice a team to pieces one day, so good are their foot skills. Wardlaw is an absolute beast. Hardeman has kicked on and looks good. Curtis, Comben, Powell and Dawson are still young and have talent. There’s probably a couple we haven’t seen too. That’s on top of Larkey and Xerri.

                            They do have thin tall stocks though. Plus some of their trades have been a bust - Daniel is terrible, Logue a crock, Corr a dud.

                            Having watched a few of their games, I think Parker is only going ok. I say that with no malice as I love the guy to death. But I suspect part of what they wanted him for was for the young guys to learn what it takes off the field as much as on.

                            The other question is whether Clarko still has it.

                            Comment

                            • Velour&Ruffles
                              Regular in the Side
                              • Jun 2006
                              • 895

                              #29
                              Originally posted by liz

                              I'm becoming increasingly irked by the conversations around the soft cap and the proposed solutions to address it.

                              I fully support more cap being available for all coaches in the league. I think it's accepted that assistant coaches have been dudded by the COVID-caused reductions being reversed for players (and, I suspect, for most senior coaches) but not for the rest of the football department. Ben Mathews, now a seasoned assistant coach, having to live away from his family in a squidgy, breeze-block apartment, because he can't afford to bring them all up to Sydney, is a blight on the competition.

                              But I take great issue with what seems to be the solution being spoken of the loudest of the senior coach's salary being excluded from the soft cap. This seems like an entirely anti-equalisation response to make the lives cushier (and more financially lucrative) for the most experienced, best paid senior coaches. If you're Chris Scott, Damian Hardwick or Alistair Clarkson, as examples, and your coaching record (and your sense of self-worth) means you demand (and receive) a high salary, you shouldn't need the same support as lesser senior coaches. If you're Dean Cox or Andrew McQualter, as examples, in your first year as a senior coach, still learning the ropes, it stands to reason that you either need more assistant coaches, or you need higher quality, more experienced assistant coaches to take the load off you somewhat. Excluding the senior coach's salary from the soft cap just creates a huge inequality in the clubs' soft caps, given the variation in senior coach salaries.

                              Why put this here? Probably not for a good reason. Except that I've been itching to unload on this topic for a while but am not sure if it warrants its own thread. So, because I perceive Chris Scott as one of the main agitators for this change, my dislike of the Cats increases even more. They've already tried to circumvent the soft cap and the impact of his salary by coming up with a "consultancy" scheme with a club partner that has all the hallmarks of Judd's Visy ambassadorial farce.

                              So the Cats (currently) sit right at the top of my "most disliked club" ladder.

                              Go Dogs!
                              Yes, I dislike the Cats immensely as well. It's hard to avoid the conclusion that they're circumventing the salary cap somehow .... are club sponsors generously making numerous WAGs ambassadors for their brands? And Chris Scott comes from the same school of bad sport, sour loser, surly whining as Hardwick and Clarko. Overall detestable.
                              But can I barrack for the Dogs ahead of them, or anyone? Not sure. I just loathe them both. I would far prefer to see the Hawks win than either the Dogs or the Cats, and I never thought I'd say that given how I felt about the Hawks for a long while.
                              My opinion is objective truth in its purest form

                              Comment

                              • dejavoodoo44
                                Veterans List
                                • Apr 2015
                                • 8488

                                #30
                                Originally posted by liz

                                I'm becoming increasingly irked by the conversations around the soft cap and the proposed solutions to address it.

                                I fully support more cap being available for all coaches in the league. I think it's accepted that assistant coaches have been dudded by the COVID-caused reductions being reversed for players (and, I suspect, for most senior coaches) but not for the rest of the football department. Ben Mathews, now a seasoned assistant coach, having to live away from his family in a squidgy, breeze-block apartment, because he can't afford to bring them all up to Sydney, is a blight on the competition.

                                But I take great issue with what seems to be the solution being spoken of the loudest of the senior coach's salary being excluded from the soft cap. This seems like an entirely anti-equalisation response to make the lives cushier (and more financially lucrative) for the most experienced, best paid senior coaches. If you're Chris Scott, Damian Hardwick or Alistair Clarkson, as examples, and your coaching record (and your sense of self-worth) means you demand (and receive) a high salary, you shouldn't need the same support as lesser senior coaches. If you're Dean Cox or Andrew McQualter, as examples, in your first year as a senior coach, still learning the ropes, it stands to reason that you either need more assistant coaches, or you need higher quality, more experienced assistant coaches to take the load off you somewhat. Excluding the senior coach's salary from the soft cap just creates a huge inequality in the clubs' soft caps, given the variation in senior coach salaries.

                                Why put this here? Probably not for a good reason. Except that I've been itching to unload on this topic for a while but am not sure if it warrants its own thread. So, because I perceive Chris Scott as one of the main agitators for this change, my dislike of the Cats increases even more. They've already tried to circumvent the soft cap and the impact of his salary by coming up with a "consultancy" scheme with a club partner that has all the hallmarks of Judd's Visy ambassadorial farce.

                                So the Cats (currently) sit right at the top of my "most disliked club" ladder.

                                Go Dogs!
                                Found it for you, Liz. Since my brief Geelong rant probably set you off, I thought I'd go back and get it.

                                Comment

                                Working...