Bulldogs to 'axe' SCG home games

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JF_Bay22_SCG
    expat Sydneysider
    • Jan 2003
    • 3978

    #16
    Originally posted by Old Royboy
    [BFootscray will still need to sell home games, but Rocket has indicated that the club's football department will push heavily for a neutral venue such as Darwin rather than hand another team such as Sydney home ground advantage on a plate. [/B]

    If so I SO THERE. I have never been to the NT & would LOVE to see Arnhem Land & some of the cool spots in the Top End.

    All I'd need is for the Swans to play in Tassie and I'd have another excuse to see another part of this beautiful country.

    JF
    "Never ever ever state that Sydney is gone.They are like cockroaches in the aftermath of a nuclear war"
    (Forum poster 'Change', Big Footy 04Apr09)

    Comment

    • australian_made
      Bandwagon Driver
      • Sep 2005
      • 235

      #17
      Originally posted by JF_Bay22_SCG
      If so I SO THERE. I have never been to the NT & would LOVE to see Arnhem Land & some of the cool spots in the Top End.

      All I'd need is for the Swans to play in Tassie and I'd have another excuse to see another part of this beautiful country.

      JF
      See you at the airport mate. im getting bored of all this flying to Melbourne anyway (though im not looking forward to Perth and Adelaide being so close together this year)
      If the siren sounds in Tasmania, and the umpires don't hear it, does it make a sound?

      Comment

      • hammo
        Veterans List
        • Jul 2003
        • 5554

        #18
        Originally posted by Old Royboy
        I think you would find that Footscray are given a fixed amount for the game, as also applied to Melbourne at the Gabba. If 30,000 do happen to turn up any difference between the take and the guarantee would go to the Swans.

        Footscray will still need to sell home games, but Rocket has indicated that the club's football department will push heavily for a neutral venue such as Darwin rather than hand another team such as Sydney home ground advantage on a plate.

        On Fox the other night Eade said that losing the SCG game last year could well have cost them a place in the finals.
        Unfortunately for Rocket, football departments don't pay the bills.
        "As everyone knows our style of football is defensive and unattractive, and as such I have completely forgotten how to mark or kick over the years" - Brett Kirk

        Comment

        • msb
          On the Rookie List
          • Mar 2006
          • 827

          #19
          Originally posted by hammo
          The Dogs get a guaranteed $250,000 for the game.

          Not entirely sure where the money comes from though.

          The Swans (from membership $$) and SCG are possibles.
          Pretty sure it comes from the swans

          Comment

          • desredandwhite
            Click!
            • Jan 2003
            • 2498

            #20
            Originally posted by JF_Bay22_SCG
            If so I SO THERE. I have never been to the NT & would LOVE to see Arnhem Land & some of the cool spots in the Top End.

            All I'd need is for the Swans to play in Tassie and I'd have another excuse to see another part of this beautiful country.

            JF
            The trouble is that it doesn't make sense for the bulldogs to play us there. They would rather play us in melbourne where we have more supporters, so the crowd is bigger.

            That's why teams like Port, Freo etc always get farmed out to "away" home games in Darwin, Tassie etc... The theory is that they wouldn't get many supporters to melbourne anyway, so there's not much loss playing them in Tassie for example.

            177th Senior AFL Match - Round 4, 2009 - Sydney vs Carlton, SCG. This is obviously out of date. I suppose I'll update it once I could be bothered sitting down with the fixture and working it out....
            Des' Weblog

            Comment

            • JF_Bay22_SCG
              expat Sydneysider
              • Jan 2003
              • 3978

              #21
              Originally posted by desredandwhite
              The trouble is that it doesn't make sense for the bulldogs to play us there. They would rather play us in melbourne where we have more supporters, so the crowd is bigger.

              That's why teams like Port, Freo etc always get farmed out to "away" home games in Darwin, Tassie etc... The theory is that they wouldn't get many supporters to melbourne anyway, so there's not much loss playing them in Tassie for example.
              I agree entirely. A Swans-Dogs match could get well over 35000 at the Dome.

              I'm only just looking from things from a highly subjective point of view. I often use the footy as an excuse to have a mini holiday & to get to explore places I have never been to. Been to WA (ZZZZZZ), been to SA, been to Vic, been to Qld. Want somewhere new to explore.

              JF
              "Never ever ever state that Sydney is gone.They are like cockroaches in the aftermath of a nuclear war"
              (Forum poster 'Change', Big Footy 04Apr09)

              Comment

              • JF_Bay22_SCG
                expat Sydneysider
                • Jan 2003
                • 3978

                #22
                Originally posted by hammo
                Unfortunately for Rocket, football departments don't pay the bills.
                And who is to say that we wouldn't have beaten them at the Ringa Ding Dome in any case.

                We generally play pretty well there.

                JF
                "Never ever ever state that Sydney is gone.They are like cockroaches in the aftermath of a nuclear war"
                (Forum poster 'Change', Big Footy 04Apr09)

                Comment

                • graystar
                  On the Rookie List
                  • Oct 2005
                  • 543

                  #23
                  It is clear that when the doggies were in bit of a slide any chance to get some cash was a good thing. Now their team list is better, they need more room for the Western Bulldogs Bandwagon.
                  I will be a member again when I return.

                  Comment

                  • Zlatorog
                    Senior Player
                    • Jan 2006
                    • 1748

                    #24
                    AFL announced their commitment to develop the game in western Sydney so the Doggies might start playing at TS or any decent ground around Canterbury if they don't like SCG. I've got a strangest feeling that they will stay in Sydney for the time being.

                    Comment

                    • stellation
                      scott names the planets
                      • Sep 2003
                      • 9718

                      #25
                      Okay, I admit that the Reserves fixture/SFL switch was a little fanciful, but I don't think it is that out of the realms of possibility if the NSW/ACT AFL and Swans put their minds to it.

                      Week 1: SFL (match of the round?) / Swans Seniors @ SCG
                      Week 2: SFL (match of the round?) / Swans reserves (bill it as a double header?) @ Henson Park or Leichardt Oval or lord knows where is best of close to the city grounds

                      The only major downsides I can think of are that people who want to see the magoos don't get to see them before the seniors, and the magoos players making the step up to seniors haven't played on the scg as much... I'm thinking AFL presence in Sydney here more than what's best for the Swans/Swans fans (but I still think it would work out okay for them).
                      I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
                      We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his time

                      Comment

                      • sydneyswans1989
                        bleeding red and white
                        • Jun 2005
                        • 384

                        #26
                        Re: Re: Bulldogs to 'axe' SCG home games

                        Originally posted by j s
                        They get more money than they would by playing it in Melbourne.
                        Yes i know that the bulldogs get more money for playing the home game at the SCG but seriously they are better off having thier home game at the telstra dome where they have more of a advantage & also for thier members to see an extra home game. Money isn't everything.....well for carlton it is
                        Forget about Hall, it's all about Bradshaw

                        Comment

                        • Ruckman
                          Ego alta, ergo ictus
                          • Nov 2003
                          • 3990

                          #27
                          Re: Re: Re: Bulldogs to 'axe' SCG home games

                          Originally posted by sydneyswans1989
                          .....well for carlton it is
                          In that case let's have 2 games a year with them up here in Sydney.

                          Comment

                          • Lucky Knickers
                            Fandom of Fabulousness
                            • Oct 2003
                            • 4220

                            #28
                            Originally posted by hammo
                            The Dogs get a guaranteed $250,000 for the game.

                            Not entirely sure where the money comes from though.

                            The Swans (from membership $$) and SCG are possibles.
                            That seems an awful lot of the readies for 1 game - are you sure it's not $25,000 per game? Or does that come out of TV rights?

                            Comment

                            • goswannie14
                              Leadership Group
                              • Sep 2005
                              • 11166

                              #29
                              Originally posted by msb
                              Pretty sure it comes from the swans
                              I have always been under the impression that this is an AFL deal, if so then the money should be coming from them.

                              BTW whilst I understand that the Sydneysiders will see one less game in Sydney, hopefully it means there will be more than 6 games in Melbourne for us "Mexicans".
                              Does God believe in Atheists?

                              Comment

                              • goswannie14
                                Leadership Group
                                • Sep 2005
                                • 11166

                                #30
                                Re: Re: Re: Re: Bulldogs to 'axe' SCG home games

                                Originally posted by Ruckman
                                In that case let's have 2 games a year with them up here in Sydney.
                                They might be playing 11 ganes a year up there.
                                Does God believe in Atheists?

                                Comment

                                Working...