Roos value vs ROK's

[ROK Lobster]

Re: Re: Re: Roos value vs ROK's

Originally posted by AussieAnge

BTW RB42 do you actually know what Roos' values are?

Or mine for that matter?

[chammond]

Re: Re: Roos value vs ROK's

Originally posted by ROK Lobster
FFS, without the stirring this place gets from the cow and me, without the hammering Bloods takes day after day, and stella's elegant humour, this place would be about as exciting as Ando world over on BigFooty.

You've got to be joking! You lot rehash the same boring, half-baked opinions over and over and over and over and then kid yourselves that you're being controversial.

You've turned this board into the footy equivalent of Days of Our Lives.

[Country Member]

Agreed.

[Piobaireachd]

Re: Roos value vs ROK's

Originally posted by royboy42
So Roos is not worth our trust...he has us where we were last season..and playing at least as well!!
Of course ROK has his conspiracy theories rolling along as well as ever..and as boringly predictable as ever..lol..tedious and predictable!
I just hope the last Sat in Sept will make ROK eat his words as he had to in 05...saying he is playing devil's advocate doesn't cut it!! ROK is a MUG!

Go easy on the ROKster. He hasn't been the same since the banning. Seriously, it has all stemmed from that.

edit: LOL. and I posted the above before I had even read the Ando world comment from ROK in chammond's post

[Piobaireachd]

Originally posted by Sanecow
Quelle surprise! The two "Roy Boys" still love their favourite son. Knock me down with a feather.

Again I say to the trolls and stalkers: If you'd rather make personal attacks than back your ridiculous claims, that's fine, it reflects on you.

PS: Any Roy Boy worth their salt would still be following the Lions.

you're funny

[ROK Lobster]

Re: Re: Re: Roos value vs ROK's

Originally posted by chammond
You've got to be joking! You lot rehash the same boring, half-baked opinions over and over and over and over and then kid yourselves that you're being controversial.

You've turned this board into the footy equivalent of Days of Our Lives.

Sorry if you find my opinions half-baked and boring. I am not sure how RWO became a soap opera but it has more to do with the bellyaching moaners who wont let me say anything negative re Roos or Kirk, but who are mostly happy to dump it on their own favourites, than it has to do with me. As for controversey, well again, I don't say anything for the sake of that. I have opinions. I still do not understand where the problem with that lies.

[AussieAnge]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Roos value vs ROK's

Originally posted by ROK Lobster
Or mine for that matter?

I was going to mention that but thought better of it as some people obviously feel they know what your values are already.

[NMWBloods]

Re: Re: Re: Roos value vs ROK's

Originally posted by chammond
You've got to be joking! You lot rehash the same boring, half-baked opinions over and over and over and over and then kid yourselves that you're being controversial.

You've turned this board into the footy equivalent of Days of Our Lives.

Would Love Story be better? It seems that most of the angst on here comes from any criticism of players, coach, playing style, etc. It's as if these areas are sacrosanct and "true supporters" don't criticise (even though half the ones complaining about this don't mind criticising when they choose to do so).

[Danzar]

Just relax, geez.

Personally, I like reading ROK's and Sanecow's posts. They're funny, to-the-point and add flavour to the site.

The last time I checked, human cloning was still illegal globally. ROK and Sanecow are living proof. Oh, and Swantastic too (sorry 'bout that )

Plus, they don't exactly tear strips off you if you disagree, which is more than I can say for some.

[anniswan]

Re: Re: Roos value vs ROK's

Originally posted by ROK Lobster
[B I have gone to lengths to say that I do not think that it is a conspiracy theory. I have said that I do not like Roos, that he is arrogant, and that I am not impressed with the way he has handled the Davis situationt. [/B]

but what have the results been, have we lost a game since. Maybe Roo's is doing the right thing

[Piobaireachd]

Originally posted by Danzar


Personally, I like reading ROK's and Sanecow's posts. They're funny, to-the-point and add flavour to the site.

ROFLMAO. There's a lot of people on here taking the piss tonight

[ROK Lobster]

Re: Re: Re: Roos value vs ROK's

Originally posted by anniswan
but what have the results been, have we lost a game since. Maybe Roo's is doing the right thing

Wel, we lost one where we could not kick a goal after qtr time. And we have beaten a few also rans. But the non-selection of Davis is not my beef (I'd much rather see him play but coaches make plenty of decisions fans don't agree with) but the way that Roos has used the media to belittle him - that sucks.

[goswannie14]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Roos value vs ROK's

Originally posted by ROK Lobster
but the way that Roos has used the media to belittle him - that sucks.

I agree with you here ROK, it's also what p***ed me off about Kirk and his smirk doing the same thing in the press.

To criticise someone for breaking team rules by speaking out in the press by doing exactly the same thing seems a little hypocritical to me.

[Bart]

Originally posted by Danzar
Personally, I like reading ROK's and Sanecow's posts. They're funny, to-the-point and add flavour to the site.

Surf and turf ? Yurrrmm

http://911giftbaskets.com/media/images/product_detail/63718.jpg

[ScottH]

Re: Re: Re: Roos value vs ROK's

Originally posted by anniswan
but what have the results been, have we lost a game since. Maybe Roo's is doing the right thing

Today.