Re:Accuracy

[hammo]

It's a simple game: you need to score more than the opposition. This is made easier by kicking more goals and less behinds.

[swantastic]

Originally posted by ScottH
It is an issue, however, you still only need to kick more behinds than your opponent.


Our accuracy comparison to opponent.

                 SS     Opp     Diff   Result
Essendon	57.1	73.9	-16.8	L
PortAdelaide	44.0	 48.4	-4.4	L
Carlton	        57.1	57.9	-0.8	W
Melbourne	48.1	 68.2	-20.0	L
Geelong	        46.9	65.0	-18.1	W
Brisbane	55.6	50.0	 5.6	W
Richmond	70.0	52.9	 17.1	W
Bulldogs	54.8	70.0	-15.2	W
Hawthorn	79.2	36.8	 42.3	W
Kangaroos	64.0	 50.0	14.0	W
St Kilda	46.7	41.2	 5.5	L
Collingwood	40.7	 56.0	-15.3	L
Fremantle	38.7	69.2	-30.5	W
Adelaide	36.4	57.7	-21.3	L
West Coast	45.0	 40.9	4.1	L
Richmond	45.2	38.9	 6.3	W
Port Adelaide	37.0	 46.7	-9.6	W
Essendon	54.8	61.1	-6.3	W
Melbourne	56.0	 76.9	-20.9	W
Geelong	        50.0	70.0	-20.0	L
Brisbane	51.9	60.0	-8.1	W

Scotty you have too much time on your hands,but very through.

[adnar]

Stop effing leading into the pockets and it will improve

[ScottH]

Accuracy still an issue? (Mol excluded, at least he doesn't miss from 2m on the run)

Carlton (for)67.7 (against)42.9 (diff)24.9 W

[goswannie14]

Originally posted by NMWBloods
A score of '63' (whatever the goal/behind mix) is crap.

So you weren't happy with 58 points on 24/09/05?

[cruiser]

Originally posted by adnar
Stop effing leading into the pockets and it will improve

Especially when the player in the pocket isnt on his own.

[NMWBloods]

Originally posted by goswannie14
So you weren't happy with 58 points on 24/09/05?

No, but I was happy the opposition scored an even more crap 54 points!!

[goswannie14]

Originally posted by NMWBloods
No, but I was happy the opposition scored an even more crap 54 points!!

LOL